A Problem With 5% Profit Sharing
01-29-2012 | 10:17 AM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Keep whining about the CAL MEC Chair. Don't clean up your own mess that is the UAL MEC. Go all USAPA on us, making it "us versus them" rather than "we". Keep making $35 grand per year less than Delta guys on the same equipment. Keep making Smisek's job easy and yours more difficult. Genius!
Or you could take a Midol, get over your "feelings" and raise the bar. That's a lot harder, but I think you can "girl up" and do it!
You make a heckuva keyboard warrior...
01-29-2012 | 10:46 AM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
How did you get over 1600 post? Letting others do the work and jumping in to take credit. Sounds like you play from the CAL MEC playbook. I do think you're trying to get my goat. Keep plugging - I'll compare anything you got or want to compare. How many have you got kick off the forum by baiting - talk about keyboard warrior............... Not on Sunday!
01-29-2012 | 12:45 PM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
The 2010 LUal profit sharing was larger than 2010 Lcal because ALL the merger fees were charged to Cal. Now it looks like the fees are shared and thus the profit on which 2011 PS is based is the same.
The amount of PS received by LUal pilots would not be any greater if Lcal pilots did not receive PS. The Lcal money would simply go back to the company.
Whether I agree with JP on how the PS issue was resolved, is besides the point when considering the % or the dollar amount that LUal pilots receive on 2/14/12. That is for another thread.
This company COULD be one heck of an airline if we get someone with some vision to run this company.
I look forward to that day
The amount of PS received by LUal pilots would not be any greater if Lcal pilots did not receive PS. The Lcal money would simply go back to the company.
Whether I agree with JP on how the PS issue was resolved, is besides the point when considering the % or the dollar amount that LUal pilots receive on 2/14/12. That is for another thread.
This company COULD be one heck of an airline if we get someone with some vision to run this company.
I look forward to that day
01-29-2012 | 02:16 PM
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
How did you get over 1600 post? Letting others do the work and jumping in to take credit. Sounds like you play from the CAL MEC playbook. I do think you're trying to get my goat. Keep plugging - I'll compare anything you got or want to compare. How many have you got kick off the forum by baiting - talk about keyboard warrior............... Not on Sunday!
Please compare the payraise that you've gotten since your merger.
Please compare the equity you've gotten since your merger.
Please compare the number of new hires you've had since your merger.
Now I get not all of that is credited to pilot leadership. What you apparently don't get is that all of that can be spoiled by bad pilot leadership. Based on both MEC's behavior, you guys would rather practice cannibalistic tribalism than find a deal that meets the needs of your pilots.
How long have your two MEC's been in Section 6? How many picketing events? How many injunctions?
Put your sights on your goal, not on each other.
If you consider this post flame bait, look in the mirror real hard.
01-29-2012 | 02:38 PM
#36
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
The 2010 LUal profit sharing was larger than 2010 Lcal because ALL the merger fees were charged to Cal. Now it looks like the fees are shared and thus the profit on which 2011 PS is based is the same.
The amount of PS received by LUal pilots would not be any greater if Lcal pilots did not receive PS. The Lcal money would simply go back to the company.
Whether I agree with JP on how the PS issue was resolved, is besides the point when considering the % or the dollar amount that LUal pilots receive on 2/14/12. That is for another thread.
This company COULD be one heck of an airline if we get someone with some vision to run this company.
I look forward to that day
The amount of PS received by LUal pilots would not be any greater if Lcal pilots did not receive PS. The Lcal money would simply go back to the company.
Whether I agree with JP on how the PS issue was resolved, is besides the point when considering the % or the dollar amount that LUal pilots receive on 2/14/12. That is for another thread.
This company COULD be one heck of an airline if we get someone with some vision to run this company.
I look forward to that day
You are saying that all merger fees were paid by LCAL and that is why your total profit was less than LUAL. HMMMMM
01-29-2012 | 03:09 PM
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
OK....
Please compare the payraise that you've gotten since your merger.
Please compare the equity you've gotten since your merger.
Please compare the number of new hires you've had since your merger.
Now I get not all of that is credited to pilot leadership. What you apparently don't get is that all of that can be spoiled by bad pilot leadership. Based on both MEC's behavior, you guys would rather practice cannibalistic tribalism than find a deal that meets the needs of your pilots.
How long have your two MEC's been in Section 6? How many picketing events? How many injunctions?
Put your sights on your goal, not on each other.
If you consider this post flame bait, look in the mirror real hard.
Please compare the payraise that you've gotten since your merger.
Please compare the equity you've gotten since your merger.
Please compare the number of new hires you've had since your merger.
Now I get not all of that is credited to pilot leadership. What you apparently don't get is that all of that can be spoiled by bad pilot leadership. Based on both MEC's behavior, you guys would rather practice cannibalistic tribalism than find a deal that meets the needs of your pilots.
How long have your two MEC's been in Section 6? How many picketing events? How many injunctions?
Put your sights on your goal, not on each other.
If you consider this post flame bait, look in the mirror real hard.
01-29-2012 | 03:11 PM
#39
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Please provide a link. So you are hunkydory with getting a 28% increase in PS this year over last and feel the same with the LUAL Side getting 15%less? Just another example of the Texas Air Entitlement Mentality. I'm sure you would even rationalize transferring our assets to your side if the operations by expressing how superior your side is.
Last edited by A320; 01-29-2012 at 04:00 PM.
01-29-2012 | 03:31 PM
#40
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
The 2010 LUal profit sharing was larger than 2010 Lcal because ALL the merger fees were charged to Cal. Now it looks like the fees are shared and thus the profit on which 2011 PS is based is the same.
The amount of PS received by LUal pilots would not be any greater if Lcal pilots did not receive PS. The Lcal money would simply go back to the company.
Whether I agree with JP on how the PS issue was resolved, is besides the point when considering the % or the dollar amount that LUal pilots receive on 2/14/12. That is for another thread.
This company COULD be one heck of an airline if we get someone with some vision to run this company.
I look forward to that day
The amount of PS received by LUal pilots would not be any greater if Lcal pilots did not receive PS. The Lcal money would simply go back to the company.
Whether I agree with JP on how the PS issue was resolved, is besides the point when considering the % or the dollar amount that LUal pilots receive on 2/14/12. That is for another thread.
This company COULD be one heck of an airline if we get someone with some vision to run this company.
I look forward to that day
Last edited by gettinbumped; 01-29-2012 at 03:45 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
