Search

Notices

Seniority?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2012 | 05:21 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by catan
A 737 is a 737 whether it's a 200 or a 900.
I always suspected that you weren't really a pilot. This statement proves it.
Reply
Old 02-18-2012 | 05:30 AM
  #122  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EWR73FO
So be it. But don't continue to come on here and and make like poor pitiful because you have no 737's left. It is what it is. YOUR membership allowed YOUR 737 fleet to be parked and YOUR membership allowed 1400+ pilots to be furloughed. CAL had nothing to do with it. How do we get this message to sink in? The CAL pilots DID NOT DO THIS TO YOU!
I think most the UAL guys know the CAL pilots didn't "do it"! You've ridden on the coat tails of the industry and had a chance to finally standup for youself and contribute. What did you do - allowed Pierce to make deals at the expense of the collective group. Don't think a 737 outfit will every be anything more than an RJ outfit. At least at SW they pay their 737 guys well. What happened to you guys, brain trust fail!
Reply
Old 02-18-2012 | 05:35 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by catan
A 737 is a 737 whether it's a 200 or a 900. It's a 737. UAL park it's 737 fleet because it was older and less efficient and looked for a "small" airplane airline to merge with - you were it! Just as Pierce has been puffing his chest to explain the inflated presence of the 767-400 being equal to a 747-400, you are trying to equate a 737 to anything smaller than a 747-400. You are a 737 airline and fly the smallest airplane on routes that are normally flown by wide-bodies. Get over yourself - you're an RJ outfit flying long-haul routes.
You are absolutely right. YOUR management parkED the 737s and did not have the foresight or money to order replacement aircraft. YOUR Management was more than happy to put Ual pilots on the street and farm out flying to the RJ.

You are right. Cal has a lot of 737s, because cal's current management also did not have any foresight. They continue to give up relatively new wide bodies like 767-200 instead of finding a route on which it can make money. LCal flies 737s to places they should fly wide bodies because cal neglected to order wide bodies.

**** poor management has defined our fleets at this moment.

UAL has more wide bodies that CAL, but they are old and tired and many not etops certified. CAL parked all it's older wide bodies. Had we kept the DC10. And 747's and even the airbus, CAL would have a lot more wide bodies. UAL hangs on to some old planes and says, look we have more wide bodies than CAL. CAL's wide bodies are newer and etops certified.
Reply
Old 02-18-2012 | 05:48 AM
  #124  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

Non Etops. I suppose that if its repeated over and over and long enough than it must be true eh? Kind of like Iraq and WMD I guess.

So all those planes on the tracks at night, how DO they do it??
Reply
Old 02-18-2012 | 05:50 AM
  #125  
Coto Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Default

Legacy United pilots deserve credit for their time on the property. We were sacrificed to position United for the Continental merger. Jay Pierce is on record as saying it is a good thing that the merger committees were put in place during the first round of negotiations in I think it was 2008, and never terminated. The TWA pilots won a suit against ALPA and the settlement is being negotiated, they don't have to go back to American.
Reply
Old 02-18-2012 | 05:52 AM
  #126  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by catan
I think most the UAL guys know the CAL pilots didn't "do it"! You've ridden on the coat tails of the industry and had a chance to finally standup for youself and contribute. What did you do - allowed Pierce to make deals at the expense of the collective group. Don't think a 737 outfit will every be anything more than an RJ outfit. At least at SW they pay their 737 guys well. What happened to you guys, brain trust fail!

So when the latest deal (TPA TA) that your Jay approved, sees the light of day, your gonna be ok with it? As of three plus years ago, we were number two in the industry on 737 pay. Kinda hard to change that without a new CBA. And no, an RJ outfit is the one that does all of your 70+ seat flying and our 50+ seat flying. If your are going to continue to use this analogy, please understand our 737's have more seats than some of your 757's and all of your Airbus fleet or are they all RJ's too?

You are one angry young man; most here would agree that you direct that anger at the wrong people. Or is that your intent?
Reply
Old 02-18-2012 | 05:52 AM
  #127  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CleCapt
You are absolutely right. YOUR management parkED the 737s and did not have the foresight or money to order replacement aircraft. YOUR Management was more than happy to put Ual pilots on the street and farm out flying to the RJ.

You are right. Cal has a lot of 737s, because cal's current management also did not have any foresight. They continue to give up relatively new wide bodies like 767-200 instead of finding a route on which it can make money. LCal flies 737s to places they should fly wide bodies because cal neglected to order wide bodies.

**** poor management has defined our fleets at this moment.

UAL has more wide bodies that CAL, but they are old and tired and many not etops certified. CAL parked all it's older wide bodies. Had we kept the DC10. And 747's and even the airbus, CAL would have a lot more wide bodies. UAL hangs on to some old planes and says, look we have more wide bodies than CAL. CAL's wide bodies are newer and etops certified.
I know the 747's came from Peoples Express (-100) I think and the Airbuses were stolen from Eastern - where did the DC-10 come from?

Here's a deal for you. You can have the number 1 slot on the combined seniority list if I can have the number 2 slot. The only condition is you never leave CLE. Is that a deal or what?
Reply
Old 02-18-2012 | 05:54 AM
  #128  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Non Etops. I suppose that if its repeated over and over and long enough than it must be true eh? Kind of like Iraq and WMD I guess.

So all those planes on the tracks at night, how DO they do it??
Does UAL not have 10-15 777 aircraft that aren't ETOPS qualified?
Reply
Old 02-18-2012 | 05:56 AM
  #129  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
Legacy United pilots deserve credit for their time on the property. We were sacrificed to position United for the Continental merger. Jay Pierce is on record as saying it is a good thing that the merger committees were put in place during the first round of negotiations in I think it was 2008, and never terminated. The TWA pilots won a suit against ALPA and the settlement is being negotiated, they don't have to go back to American.
Agreed. Has there been something to say they won't get any credit for that time?
Reply
Old 02-18-2012 | 05:56 AM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Default

Do people really give a crap what size aircraft they fly? I care about two things, pay and schedule. Whether it's a 737 or a 747, i could care less. I'd much rather be flying a 737 for SWA than a 747 for UAL. I'd much rather fly a 737 for CAL than a 747 for Atlas and I'd much rather fly a 727 at FEDEX than all of the above.

When we get into these pointless debates it just fuels the fire for management. I'm sure they love it when our egos get involved in scope. "70 seat RJ?" "Let the 'kids' fly it, I'm a big metal driver," blah, blah, blah.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
forgot to bid
Major
242
05-27-2009 11:26 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
mike734
Major
15
09-17-2007 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices