Search

Notices

LUAL 737s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2012 | 12:12 PM
  #71  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sovt
If you want to use Capt. Brucia's dissent as the basis for dealing with the L-UAL furloughees I'll sign on to that plan. But you guys really ought to read the award.
Not surprisingly, you didn't print the couple paragraphs prior to that where he advocated something more substantial before he continued with, "At a minimum..."

Well played.
Reply
Old 03-15-2012 | 12:47 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Default

Lee,

Thanks for the factual post. I wasn't aware of any option for A320's. Still doesn't explain why those options weren't exercised earlier.
Reply
Old 03-15-2012 | 12:53 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
Not surprisingly, you didn't print the couple paragraphs prior to that where he advocated something more substantial before he continued with, "At a minimum..."

Well played.
I don't see what your seeing. His dissention is almost entirely based on those east pilots that were recalled after the merger announcement and before the award. Most of whom at the time of the announcement were flying for MidAtlantic (a division of AAA).

For those that may be interested.

http://leonidas.cactuspilots.us/atta...on%20Award.pdf
Reply
Old 03-15-2012 | 01:32 PM
  #74  
SLI best wishes!
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: B767 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
Lee,

Thanks for the factual post. I wasn't aware of any option for A320's. Still doesn't explain why those options weren't exercised earlier.
Rumors are the 42 A320 are coming....I believe it when I see them on the tarmac...
Reply
Old 03-15-2012 | 01:35 PM
  #75  
Short Bus Drive's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
Agreed,

It would be great to get away from this. However, there is such a divide in thinking over what did or did not happen in 2008 that I believe it merits discussion. If this divide is not bridged by the time an arbitrated ruling comes out we may find ourselves in USAir/AmWest debacle. I'd rather hash it out now than try to at the last minute.

Also, I like to hear the other side's argument. Some points are salient, others not so much. It is good to get the other perspective.
How does hashing it out on a board benefit anything?
Reply
Old 03-15-2012 | 01:42 PM
  #76  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
Thanks for the factual post. I wasn't aware of any option for A320's. Still doesn't explain why those options weren't exercised earlier.
FWIW, the current delivery slots are for 2013-14. It's getting pretty close to the time when UAL will need to fish-or-cut-bait for 2013, but these aircraft have been renegotiated several times so another change would not be surprising. In addition, UAL already paid the deposits but later wrote the value of the deposits off the books to follow accounting rules so if these birds ever appear they will be accompanied by a positive accounting change.

Airbus has the United options listed in their downloadable spreadsheet here.

Last edited by cadetdrivr; 03-15-2012 at 01:53 PM.
Reply
Old 03-15-2012 | 02:04 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LeeMat
Rumors are the 42 A320 are coming....I believe it when I see them on the tarmac...
Lee,

I'm with you. Even if we do get them, what are they replacing? Growth is not in their vocabulary.
Reply
Old 03-15-2012 | 02:06 PM
  #78  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: EWR 756 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
Let's get some things straight:

1. "In 2008, when the supposed secret merger took place" It was no secret at all. The merger agreement died at the midnight hour and the CEO of CAL resigned shortly there after to pursue other interests (read between the lines).

2. LUAL Management made no bones about "right sizing" the airline and they parked the B737s because they were PAID FOR. The question always asked why park an asset that is debt free and low cost to operate? Answer. Because if they parked one of the leased aircraft the leases would still be due, generating revenue or not.

3. Right sizing was done because the industry was unsustainable at those current levels. The Finance boys at the top said, "raise ticket prices," which means "capacity control/discipline."

4. The finance guys killed the 2008 merger because of the size and unsustainable revenue.

5. The Finance guys could have cared less about a pilot(s) being furloughed.

6. The LUAL pilots did have higher expectations and futures over LCAL pilots until the "right sizing."

Joe Friday, "Just the facts mam."
Well, you can go ahead with those career expectations (they may be higher, but how realistic were they?) We'll call the whole thing off, and I'll take CAL's business plan and fleet, and you can have UAL's

I still haven't seen any real quote from anyone at UAL Mgt. about "right sizing" for anything. Where is that anyway ?
Reply
Old 03-15-2012 | 02:52 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default

Speedtape

My post was all about the facts, and whether you care or not is your issue. what I was observing on this growing ridiculous thread is comments like yours, "Well, you can go ahead with those career expectations" and the others who are arguing about stuff they only have an inkling about.

The ISL will be arbitrated, which means everyone's expectations will be dashed with one exception, the most Jr. Captains at LCAL, they will make out like bandits. That is a fact none of us will be able to avoid and argue against.

As far as the orders for 320s goes I have another fact for you. UAL is currently in negotiations for the next generation of narrow body jets. It is no hidden secret it is between the 320 NEO and the B737 MAX. Additional there are many indications some sort of 90 seater are in the mix, but I wouldn't bet on anything.

So show a little human compassion for those who went before you, got furloughed and may end up junior to you. I have discovered after over three decades at this business the old proverb, "What goes around comes around," is true.

Oh you might go back and check on this fact; when LCAL original ordered the 787s and 737-900s being taken delivery this year they did not have financing in place (it was just completed this past week based on the strength of the combined airline), while LUAL's orders for 2013??? have financing in place.

"Just the facts mam"
Reply
Old 03-15-2012 | 03:05 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default

Let's see...

"Graham Atkinson, executive vice president at United and president of the airline’s Mileage Plus frequent flyer programme said, “The current conditions are too brutal to keep on flying capacity that isn’t needed. We have got to size the airline to the new reality.”

"Chairman, President and CEO Glenn Tilton said the "aggressive steps. . . demonstrate our commitment to size our business appropriately to reflect the current market reality, leverage capacity discipline to pass commodity costs on to customers, develop new revenue streams and continue to reduce nonfuel costs and capital expenditures."

In a message to employees, COO John Tague said the cuts are necessary "to assure United's long-term viability." He explained that retirement of the 737 fleet will "dramatically simplify our fleet and reduce our maintenance liability." Further, the retirements will remove the "oldest and least fuel-efficient jets" from service, reducing the average age of UA's fleet by 1.3 years to 11.8 years. " I said this... "3. Right sizing was done because the industry was unsustainable at those current levels. The Finance boys at the top said, "raise ticket prices," which means "capacity control/discipline."

Last edited by Regularguy; 03-15-2012 at 03:06 PM. Reason: Added a quote from previous post
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ryane946
Major
21
03-18-2012 01:27 PM
Regularguy
United
11
02-22-2012 05:36 PM
shfo
Major
5
04-14-2009 04:50 AM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
3
03-25-2008 06:02 PM
Zeroto4
Major
0
05-04-2006 11:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices