Scope 6-14-12
06-14-2012 | 04:26 PM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: IAH 320 CA
"All the other LCAL councils" remaining quiet is no more.
IAH just put out that they are down to Compensation, Scope, and economic R&I items.
As if those were no big deal........
LCAL councils, shut the **** up already!!!! Let it run it's course.
IAH just put out that they are down to Compensation, Scope, and economic R&I items.
As if those were no big deal........
LCAL councils, shut the **** up already!!!! Let it run it's course.
06-14-2012 | 06:01 PM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
This LCAL Council 153 are chumps for putting this out so near to the planned deadline of the 15th. All they are doing is starting gossip about a section NO ONE HAS ANY IDEA ABOUT!
You might notice all the other LCAL and LUAL councils ahev remained quite and are letting the JNT do their work.
So it is a bad thing to put out and these men need to be horse whipped for violating the trust of 12000 pilots during a critical phase of negotiation.
Shame on your three!!!!
You might notice all the other LCAL and LUAL councils ahev remained quite and are letting the JNT do their work.
So it is a bad thing to put out and these men need to be horse whipped for violating the trust of 12000 pilots during a critical phase of negotiation.
Shame on your three!!!!
06-14-2012 | 07:18 PM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Do you know the LAX reps? This is a poor response.
This LCAL Council 153 are chumps for putting this out so near to the planned deadline of the 15th. All they are doing is starting gossip about a section NO ONE HAS ANY IDEA ABOUT!
You might notice all the other LCAL and LUAL councils ahev remained quite and are letting the JNT do their work.
So it is a bad thing to put out and these men need to be horse whipped for violating the trust of 12000 pilots during a critical phase of negotiation.
Shame on your three!!!!
You might notice all the other LCAL and LUAL councils ahev remained quite and are letting the JNT do their work.
So it is a bad thing to put out and these men need to be horse whipped for violating the trust of 12000 pilots during a critical phase of negotiation.
Shame on your three!!!!
06-14-2012 | 07:37 PM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Imo we need to see the final language of a TA. The TA also needs a comparison, section by section of the CAL and UAL contracts. Finally, the spin miesters need to stay away and let the pilots make their own, informed decisions.
06-15-2012 | 03:31 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Isn't that the job of the MEC? If the MEC's vote no then it will not be presented to the membership. I'm totally in favor of zero concessions in any section. Do we want want individual LEC's or it's members cherry picking the negotiating process?
06-15-2012 | 03:37 AM
#17
Banned
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Based on the past rushed sales job of an egregiously concessionary contract last time around, cherry picking, nit picking, whatever....is definitely in order.
06-15-2012 | 05:25 AM
#18
Banned
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
The CAL pilots have NEVER voted no on any TA placed before them since 1995. If we can head a train wreck off at the pass, why not do so? Letting it run it's course is what got us the POS C02 we still suffer under now, or are most guys happy with reserve double-pump, VJM, and no snap-back provisions?
06-15-2012 | 05:27 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
So EWR, do you now understand the frustration of myself and all the other posters? L-CAL LEC's need to let the first string do their job and not bite at the ankles of those actually doing the negotiating. Don't try to bait me into your typical personal attacks. I don't know you personally, but from your positions on this board, it would be a real quiet flight if we are ever crewed together.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
