Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Furloughed LUAL guys.... >

Furloughed LUAL guys....

Search
Notices

Furloughed LUAL guys....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2012, 01:54 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LeeFXDWG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B737 CAPT IAH
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by liquid View Post
CAL does not staff based on pilot-to-aircraft ratios, they staff purely on block hours. Completely different philosophies. Want to guess who's in charge of manpower planning at UCH? (hint: you won't like the answer)

The two subsidiaries fly approx the same number of block hours, I'll let you determine the amount of pilots staffed at each.

Liquid
Actually, you're wrong. As a former scheduling committee guy, they do it the same way too...based on block hours. The variables (those pesky work rules, vacation, etc.) result in different pilot requirements. There is no "x" number of pilots per aircraft calculation made at UAL for pilot staffing.

Frats,
Lee
LeeFXDWG is offline  
Old 08-14-2012, 01:58 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LeeFXDWG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B737 CAPT IAH
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by liquid View Post
Hummm I seem to remember UAL ALPA amending the ALPA merger policy to include longevity.... Sounds like you were trying to protect yourselves as far as seniority integration for a merger with CAL or was it USair?

You see Syd we can go back and forth endlessly. Here's the simple fact: We, UAL-CAL, are one company. Time to move on, pick up the pieces.
I agree with the move on part, but the merger policy wasn't changed by anything UAL ALPA did. It was changed by Nat'l after the DAL/NWA merger precedent. And the change came about well before the UAL/CAL merger. If you have information on some action by UAL ALPA having a part in that change please share.

Frats,
Lee
LeeFXDWG is offline  
Old 08-14-2012, 02:24 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SeamusTheHound's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 757/767 First Officer
Posts: 365
Default

Why not go to the source for accurate information?

"As always, I welcome the opportunity to connect with you via phone or e-mail. Please make contact if I can be of help.
Respectfully,
Andy Chen
872-825-9502
[email protected]"

Keeping in mind that Andy Chen is despised by most United pilots, you can also contact the UAL MEC Furlough Coordinator:

"If you need clarification, have any questions or need further assistance, please contact:

J. Todd Coomans
UAL MEC Furlough Coordinator
[email protected]
847-292-1700 Ext. 6 "
SeamusTheHound is offline  
Old 08-14-2012, 02:26 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by liquid View Post
Hummm I seem to remember UAL ALPA amending the ALPA merger policy to include longevity.... Sounds like you were trying to protect yourselves as far as seniority integration for a merger with CAL or was it USair?
Originally Posted by LeeFXDWG View Post
I agree with the move on part, but the merger policy wasn't changed by anything UAL ALPA did. It was changed by Nat'l after the DAL/NWA merger precedent. And the change came about well before the UAL/CAL merger. If you have information on some action by UAL ALPA having a part in that change please share.
+1

The last thing UAL ALPA would have wanted to do in fear of a USAir merger was add longevity to the equation given the demographics of the two groups.

Rather the "new" ALPA policy was the outcome of the hard lessons learned by the US Airways/America West fiasco.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 08-14-2012, 02:43 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Coto Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Default

We should be following the lead of the IAM and AFA which is now DOH.
Coto Pilot is offline  
Old 08-14-2012, 03:42 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: 737F
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by Coto Pilot View Post
We should be following the lead of the IAM and AFA which is now DOH.
Yeah right....give the 83-85 guys instant left seat in all your 74's and 777's, that will work out just fine for your senior guys huh? (eyes rolling)

You should think before you freaking post.

Im all for credit where credit is due..ie: longevity, career expectations, time in seat etc. All that is worth some percentage in a SLI

But I don't agree for a minute that ANYONE should end up much more senior or junior that they were before the merger.

We all know more than a few will get screwed in this SLI, it shouldn't be a complete A... f...ing
Wrsofked is offline  
Old 08-14-2012, 03:52 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by Wrsofked View Post
We all know more than a few will get screwed in this SLI, it shouldn't be a complete A... f...ing
No it shouldn't but we'll know if the SLI was successful if every pilot (other than #1) is equally complaining about their A...f...ing.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 08-14-2012, 04:01 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Isn't there a group at cal that did some flow through I think they call it where they didn't fly at cal until 93 or 95 but there seniority is 87 or 89 something along those lines? They flew for cal express before that?
syd111 is offline  
Old 08-14-2012, 04:19 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: 737F
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by syd111 View Post
Isn't there a group at cal that did some flow through I think they call it where they didn't fly at cal until 93 or 95 but there seniority is 87 or 89 something along those lines? They flew for cal express before that?
There were pilots transitioning from the old "COEX" for a lot of years starting in the early 90's from flow through or PDP (pilot development program), and later on express jet flow through. Some were deferred from transitioning at their due times for staffing reasons. They have seniority from their original scheduled transisition time. That all ended in early 2005.

And of course after 9-11 there were flow backs to COEX, you could take a seat at COEX or furlough. Clear as mud...
Wrsofked is offline  
Old 08-14-2012, 05:48 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Coto Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Default

Think before I post, really? I have had 13 years to think. I have been screwed by more senior pilots at United more times than I can count. Think bond distribution, no furlough clause. I have 1650 Continental pilots that were hired after me, if you only include time on the property, then it is still 1625 pilots behind me. I am fine with date of hire. Screw the 83-85 hires on both lists.
Coto Pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thrustsetrj200
Regional
57
08-08-2009 11:44 AM
pilot141
Cargo
5
05-24-2007 06:28 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
40
11-11-2006 02:18 PM
ToiletDuck
Military
3
07-21-2006 02:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices