Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Congratulations United Pilots! >

Congratulations United Pilots!

Search

Notices

Congratulations United Pilots!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2012 | 06:44 AM
  #81  
UalHvy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
I voted no. There are a lot of things in the TA that I really liked, but there were enough bad things to make me vote no. Now we all have to live with it. No need to discuss or blame anything or anyone. I will laugh at any yes voter complaining about something in their contract. Who's making the "Don't blame me, I voted no" buttons. I'll buy one.
I'll be wearing the button that says, "Quit your whining and move on."
Reply
Old 12-16-2012 | 09:44 AM
  #82  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: 757/767 FO
Default

"WOW thats some powerful crack !"
Not powerful crack, its in the 8K, 10K and 10Q reports. CAL was heading into bankruptcy without this merger. Their bonds were trading at .60 on the dollar but, after the merger was announced, the bonds were paid off at par.
"CAL was the bankrupt carrier with parts hocked for credit?
Please, go ahead and make that argument to the mediators."
I dont know what arguments will be made but I am expecting to get hosed. Just hope CALs financial position is considered for "career expectaion" purposes.

CAL is a 2x chp participant in chp 11 and cant do it again. Ual had another bite at the apple. It would have been chp 7 for CAL.

The CAL pilots would be "...eking out a hand-to-mouth existence...." if it were not for this merger.
Smizek: "At Continental, although I am very proud of Continental, I thinkwe have done a very good job, candidly, Congressman, we are eking out a hand-to-mouth existence. And that is not a future that I want for my employees,...."

page 101/329 or page 77 on the top of this document http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-111hhrg57059/pdf/CHRG-111hhrg57059.pdf


"Amazing to see how you guys went from constantly talking about how badly you wanted this merger to "your welcome" "
I think UAL wanted USAIR but then Smisek sought out UAL:

Mr. Smisek. Sure. Let me speak to that if I could. This
merger came together very quickly. We learned that United
Airlines, through pressure, of course, was in negotiations to merge with another carrier, and United was the right strategic partner for Continental. So we needed to move swiftly, and we did so over about a 3-week period. That swiftness was such that the processes for reaching agreements during collective bargaining agreements with our pilots or other work groups could not move that swiftly.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-111hhrg57059/html/CHRG-111hhrg57059.htm



"Sometimes when you try to help a drowning man, you only get pulled under with him"
-Larry Kellner on walking away from the UAL merger[/QUOTE]
UAL Capt- "Why did you call off the merger in 2008?"
Smisek-"We never really called off the merger, that is just what we told the press." paraphrase
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ma...avascript.html
Reply
Old 12-16-2012 | 09:59 AM
  #83  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: EWR 756 Captain
Default

"Sometimes when you try to help a drowning man, you only get pulled under with him"
-Larry Kellner on walking away from the UAL merger[/QUOTE]
UAL Capt- "Why did you call off the merger in 2008?"
Smisek-"We never really called off the merger, that is just what we told the press." paraphrase
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ma...avascript.html[/QUOTE]

Paraphrase of what Smisek supposedly said to a UAL CA on a cockpit visit? Priceless.
Use that please.
We'll stand behind our financials, new aircraft orders with actual financing behind them, Higher pay and multiple customer service awards etc...

Good luck to ya !!
Reply
Old 12-16-2012 | 10:57 AM
  #84  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by cgull
"WOW thats some powerful crack !"
Not powerful crack, its in the 8K, 10K and 10Q reports. CAL was heading into bankruptcy without this merger. Their bonds were trading at .60 on the dollar but, after the merger was announced, the bonds were paid off at par.
"CAL was the bankrupt carrier with parts hocked for credit?
Please, go ahead and make that argument to the mediators."
I dont know what arguments will be made but I am expecting to get hosed. Just hope CALs financial position is considered for "career expectaion" purposes.

CAL is a 2x chp participant in chp 11 and cant do it again. Ual had another bite at the apple. It would have been chp 7 for CAL.

The CAL pilots would be "...eking out a hand-to-mouth existence...." if it were not for this merger.
Smizek: "At Continental, although I am very proud of Continental, I thinkwe have done a very good job, candidly, Congressman, we are eking out a hand-to-mouth existence. And that is not a future that I want for my employees,...."

page 101/329 or page 77 on the top of this document http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-111hhrg57059/pdf/CHRG-111hhrg57059.pdf


"Amazing to see how you guys went from constantly talking about how badly you wanted this merger to "your welcome" "
I think UAL wanted USAIR but then Smisek sought out UAL:

Mr. Smisek. Sure. Let me speak to that if I could. This
merger came together very quickly. We learned that United
Airlines, through pressure, of course, was in negotiations to merge with another carrier, and United was the right strategic partner for Continental. So we needed to move swiftly, and we did so over about a 3-week period. That swiftness was such that the processes for reaching agreements during collective bargaining agreements with our pilots or other work groups could not move that swiftly.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-111hhrg57059/html/CHRG-111hhrg57059.htm



"Sometimes when you try to help a drowning man, you only get pulled under with him"
-Larry Kellner on walking away from the UAL merger
UAL Capt- "Why did you call off the merger in 2008?"
Smisek-"We never really called off the merger, that is just what we told the press." paraphrase
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ma...avascript.html[/QUOTE]


Was UAL not a 2x participant as well? As for hocking spares, UAL pledged all of their spare parts and engines as collateral for a $170ishM loan at 17% before the merger. Who was in trouble?
Reply
Old 12-16-2012 | 11:19 AM
  #85  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: 757/767 FO
Default

"Paraphrase of what Smisek supposedly said to a UAL CA on a cockpit visit? Priceless.
Use that please."

Priceless like the Kellner quote, thats why I put it in there for you to enjoy.
Reply
Old 12-16-2012 | 11:26 AM
  #86  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: 757/767 FO
Default

"Was UAL not a 2x participant as well? As for hocking spares, UAL pledged all of their spare parts and engines as collateral for a $170ishM loan at 17% before the merger. Who was in trouble?"

1 UAL was not a 2 x chp 11, only 1 time.
2 yes ual hocked stuff CAL was out of stuff to hock
3 yes at 17% but not as bad as CAL at 60 cents on the dollar
4 CAL was going bankrupt again and chp 7 till Jeff Lorenzo cozied up with Glenn.

Just remember what Jeff said, "Eking out a hand to mouth existance".
Reply
Old 12-16-2012 | 11:34 AM
  #87  
Lerxst's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: B787 CA - SFO
Default

I doubt anything either talking suit had to say when pandering to Congress will have anything to do with the Arbitrator's decision, but I went ahead and posted what Tilton had to say during the hearings at the bottom. They might actually look at some financials, though. Does it really matter? We both sucked and wouldn't be able to effectively compete with DAL on an economy of scale. Have a cookie.



UNITED, THEY FALL (INTO DEBT)

By JOSH KOSMAN

Last Updated: 3:51 PM, June 30, 2009

United Airlines is having its own version of the trip from hell.

The airline, reeling from a decline in customers and running short on cash, is paying a steep 17 percent interest on $175 million in debt it issued, leading analysts to bet the company is just a few steps from the grave.

Indeed, that interest rate represents a full 6 percentage points above where rival airlines have paid in recent debt raisings, and is more than double what it paid nine years ago when it sold $186.4 million in debt at a yield of slightly more than 8 percent, according to Bloomberg data.

United Airlines parent UAL was planning to sell the debt at a 12.75 percent interest, but was forced to sweeten things due to both a lack of investor interest and management desperation, said analyst Roger King of CreditSights.

Others have noted that the steep interest rate reflects a lack of desirable assets to use as collateral.

UAL is considered the laggard among the big airlines, even as the airlines' overall passenger demand is off 10 percent compared with last summer. Also, the company has just $2.5 billion of cash on hand, compared with Delta, which has $7 billion.

To be sure, it's a difficult time for all airlines. However, UAL has some unique challenges.

When it was in bankruptcy from 2002 through 2006, it focused on attracting premium customers -- a move that now leaves it vulnerable given there's less business travel and more consumers are favoring price over luxury when it comes to travel.

Making matters worse, UAL may have near-term liquidity issues, and could begin to get squeezed by credit-card companies that fret they'd have to refund customers who bought tickets out of their own pockets if UAL collapses. King said UAL is now in talks with American Express about reaching a new arrangement to address this threat.

Last week, the airline announced it would lay off another 600 flight attendants in the fall. King said the company has basically already made about all the cuts it can.



US CREDIT-UAL debt pricing may indicate liquidity fears



Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:42pm EDT

By Karen Brettell

NEW YORK, June 29 (Reuters) - Bond investors are demanding

a high yield to take on even the secured debt of UAL Corp

UAUA.O as declining travel demand continues to hurt revenues

at the company, the parent of United Airlines, and raises the

risk its liquidity could come under stress.

United Airlines on Friday sold $175 million in senior notes

backed by its U.S. aircraft spare parts. The notes were priced

at 90 cents on the dollar to earn a yield of 17 percent,

according to Thomson Reuters data.

"The pricing indicates lack of investor interest and

management desperation," CreditSights analysts Roger King,

Aidas Baublys and Brian Studioso said in a report on Monday.

"Whether it was due to banker exuberance or company

desperation is unclear, but this type of issuance is frequently

just a few steps from the grave. It signifies that sources of

liquidity are up against a limit while investors have yet to

perceive any rising tide of seasonal demand," they said.

UAL denies that the pricing of the debt sale was out of

line with general market conditions.

"The transaction was oversubscribed with terms that reflect

the transaction structure, the nature of the collateral used

and the tight credit market," said UAL spokesperson Jean

Medina, in Chicago.

The sale "will further boost our liquidity as we continue

to take the right actions in response to the difficult

environment, adjusting capacity and reducing our cost

structure," she added. "We continue to take actions to raise

liquidity, having raised more than $500 million in the first

quarter alone."

LIQUIDITY CONCERNS

Concerns that UAL's liquidity could come under pressure

have increased as the outlook for travel demand remains bleak

and the risk of a renewed surge in fuel prices remains a risk.

Credit default swaps on UAL's debt are reflecting a high

bankruptcy concern at 59 percent the sum insured as an upfront

cost, or $5.9 million to insure $10 million for five years, in

addition to annual payments of $500,000, according to data by

Markit.

Fitch Ratings this month cut UAL's issuer credit rating two

notches to CCC, eight steps below investment grade and a deeply

speculative grade.

United could report substantially negative free cash flow

for the final three quarters of 2009, and the airline has $655

million of debt and capital leases maturing in the last three

quarters of the year, Fitch said.

"Even if revenue trends stabilize late in the year, the

airline faces over $1 billion in scheduled debt and capital

lease principal payments next year, raising the probability of

a deepening liquidity crisis," Fitch added.

Management has indicated that an estimated $1.7 billion in

remaining unencumbered assets could be used to improve

liquidity in the future, though much of these assets are older

aircraft and engines that may not be easily monetized, Fitch

said.

"United may have difficulty raising a large amount of new

capital over the near term as credit market conditions remain

very tight," Fitch said.

Meanwhile the ability of bondholders to obtain the parts

backing the recent debt sale in the event of bankruptcy may be

challenged, CreditSights said.

"The history of aircraft parts collateral in bankruptcy has

been spotty," and bondholders in a past case involving the

now-defunct TWA airline were wiped out when a bankruptcy judge

did not want to deal with commingled inventory, the analysts

said.

"Given the inherent limitations of spare parts collateral,

bondholders are betting their principal investment that the

issuer will not default over the next three years. That does

not seem to be a good bet right now," CreditSights said.

(Editing by James Dalgleish)



Aviation Week September 6, 2010 issue:



In regards to the UAL-CAL merger:



~~~



In separate testimony, United Chairman Glenn Tilton also “warns of catastrophe should the merger fail.



United's domestic passenger share decreased from approximately 15% in 1998 to approximately 11% at the end of the third quarter of 2009. United's global revenue ranking fell from second to sixth over the same period. If United remains a stand-alone entity, the company expects its ability to sustain sufficient profitability and to return a reasonable return on capital base across the economic cycle to continue to be at risk.
Reply
Old 12-16-2012 | 11:36 AM
  #88  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: 757/767 FO
Default

"We'll stand behind our financials, new aircraft orders with actual financing behind them, Higher pay and multiple customer service awards etc..."

1 Your financials sucked
2 The SEC asked Kellner where the financing was for 1/2 the aircraft orders. Did UAL finance those aircraft orders? Who was doing the financing and under what conditions? Your financiers would not finance unless merger was in place.
3 Higher pay? Irrelevant under a bankruptcy contract.
4 Customer service awards dont mean Jack but the Denver accident and Colgan Air Crash do according to your financials 2009/2008 10k 1a risk factors.
Reply
Old 12-16-2012 | 01:02 PM
  #89  
ERJ Jay's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by jetserf
Sadly, I don't think you will realize how much you have lost until you start working under this new contract.
They have no idea what they're in for.

For us it's SOP - and that's really sad.

Everyone says their Express contract(s) were better than CAL's.

Now "yes" voters are slapping themselves on the back.

You guys have no idea what you're in for.

And may the PBS gods give you Overall Solution Constraint for the life of the contract.

After all, you "asked" for it.

Award - Pain
Avoid - Life
Reply
Old 12-16-2012 | 01:40 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default

Boy has this turned ugly.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
bgmann
Regional
33
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
13
11-09-2010 11:38 AM
skippy
GoJet
4
05-11-2009 08:55 PM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices