Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Important to keep in mind >

Important to keep in mind


Notices

Important to keep in mind

Old 04-27-2013 | 05:21 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Olecal
It's hard to get it through to some of you, but each side will put there best foot forward, and the arbitrators will decide! I'd be very surprised if the UAL list isn't the antithesis of the CAL list! Who cares what they put forward, only the results will count! Just be prepared to live with it! I will...
Well, then prepared to be surprised. It is not Mr. Freund's style to shoot for the moon like Mr. Katz. A stategy that our side understands and will follow. It worked well in Dal/Nwa and Usa/Awa, where Mr. Katz' side lost their a$$es. Just sit back and watch.

Sled
Old 04-27-2013 | 06:05 AM
  #52  
Sunvox's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
From: UAL retired
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
The panel won't see either of your arguments. None of us is on the committee.
Ahh young grasshopper this is true, but Mr. Freund already laid out this very same argument in detail both in his opening presentation and in the opening brief. Does the fact that the mega-carrier theory is now history and the stand alone carrier business plan failed worry you.

If I were a CAL pilot it would definitely worry me. Especially if you're a Captain and were hired say 2005 timeline. You COULD be a bottom reserve pilot for a VERY long time, but then maybe not. Maybe the panel will agree that the age of your fleet, your higher W2s, and your decade of out performing legacy carriers that were busy shedding debt and pensions to prepare for the future better will win the day. Maybe. Who knows right?
Old 04-27-2013 | 07:42 AM
  #53  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by Olecal
His QOL is better at CAL, that is the bottom line!!! QOL has a lot to do with career expectations!
That's as ridiculous as the pilot who held up the iphone and said he had more technology in his palm than the entire 747, 757, and 767 fleet.

It is short term being a line holder vs reserve. Also wanting to see how things fall out. His career if far better at United long term than at CAL.
Old 04-27-2013 | 07:46 AM
  #54  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
The panel won't see either of your arguments. None of us is on the committee.
You think these aren't being read by someone? Well the express jet forums were being read. They were specifically mentioned day 4.

I think the arguments are natural ones, and we will likely see them all mentioned during the UAL presentation.
Old 04-27-2013 | 07:52 AM
  #55  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by Olecal
Age has nothing to do with it! So what your saying is, because you are younger, you have time! They didn't make the career decision for the folks at UAL. They chose a different path, and you feel they should be punished for that? See NS's testimony of 'A tale of two pilots". My mediator friend says that is a very difficult situation for the arbitrators to overlook, it's likely they won't!
Age has everything to do with it. That why the CAL side did exactly ZERO analysis of doing an actuarial style analysis of career expectations. They only wanted to totally get the best starting point today and used every outlier they could find to make their points.

How can you possibly know how your career progression is going to come out unless you say "This is what our proposed list looks like in 10 years...."
Old 04-27-2013 | 08:51 AM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 308
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
His career if far better at United long term than at CAL.
Conjecture ... can you tell us how you arrived at this conclusion?
Old 04-27-2013 | 09:57 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: 767 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by Olecal
Age has nothing to do with it! So what your saying is, because you are younger, you have time! They didn't make the career decision for the folks at UAL. They chose a different path, and you feel they should be punished for that? See NS's testimony of 'A tale of two pilots". My mediator friend says that is a very difficult situation for the arbitrators to overlook, it's likely they won't!
So what YOU'RE saying is, absent a merger, I retire in the top 10% of the seniority list; with a merger and the "proposed" CAL SLI, I retire at the 45% mark. Meanwhile, the entire widebody fleet is filled with CAL guys that would have never seen a widebody captain's seat without the merger. I'm sure that factored in to these young jedis' minds when they took a job at CAL (rolling my eyes).
Old 04-27-2013 | 10:27 AM
  #58  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Olecal
See NS's testimony of 'A tale of two pilots".
I don't have the transcript in front of me but is that the one during the CAL presentation where the UAL attorney later cross-examanined the witness and pointed out, using the exact same two pilots presented during his testimony, that the furloughed UAL pilot would retire a 747 CA and the CAL pilot could never hold anything other than 737 CA despite the 15 year age difference????

If so, then yes I agree, I think the arbitrators should have noticed.
Old 04-27-2013 | 11:49 AM
  #59  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
I don't have the transcript in front of me but is that the one during the CAL presentation where the UAL attorney later cross-examanined the witness and pointed out, using the exact same two pilots presented during his testimony, that the furloughed UAL pilot would retire a 747 CA and the CAL pilot could never hold anything other than 737 CA despite the 15 year age difference????

If so, then yes I agree, I think the arbitrators should have noticed.
My favorite part was when the UAL attorney was cross examining one of the CAL merger committee members and said "Obviously I'm not going to get you to admit your proposal is ridiculous".
Old 04-27-2013 | 11:54 AM
  #60  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotbiffster
So what YOU'RE saying is, absent a merger, I retire in the top 10% of the seniority list; with a merger and the "proposed" CAL SLI, I retire at the 45% mark. Meanwhile, the entire widebody fleet is filled with CAL guys that would have never seen a widebody captain's seat without the merger. I'm sure that factored in to these young jedis' minds when they took a job at CAL (rolling my eyes).
The CAL merger committee is well aware of that. That's why they couldn't do any future projections. They just talked about where people are today and ignored the future. No matter how the list is done, this is good for them long term.

They aren't stupid. They get what you are saying. They obviously benefit every year more than the previous year. That's why guys on this forum on the CAL side don't want to talk about career expectations.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UpThere
Career Questions
1
10-07-2008 07:14 AM
Airsupport
Regional
58
06-19-2008 11:08 AM
Engineer Pilot
Regional
8
03-22-2007 10:54 AM
wtn0014
Regional
13
06-22-2006 07:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices