![]() |
Originally Posted by sleeves
(Post 1532384)
Doubtful... MGT always has a reason why you must vote yes. We will fall for it again. It is always someone fault besides the guy who voted yes.
Like someone at CAL famously said "Contract come and go but SLI lasts forever." |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1532131)
Doesn't matter. There was nothing in merger policy that said all pilots on furlough have to be placed behind all pilots not on furlough. It was a "seniority list" integration, not "active pilot" integration. Also, the most recent merger that used the new policy did the exact same thing. Pilots on furlough were placed with active pilots because it was based on longevity.
You were a guppy FO before the merger and you still are. What's the problem? You haven't dropped in status. |
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 1532374)
AND the logic behind the delay, was flawed from the start. One need look no further than the ISL. So we accepted a concessionary contract full of Easter Eggs for El Heffe.
Of course, you'd actually have to read the thing, and ALPA policy, and have some sort of historical perspective, and the ability to connect dots, etc etc etc to figure this all out. But hey, we'll get em next time! Right. |
Originally Posted by Benwarren
(Post 1532502)
That itself is the problem. New policy that cuddles the UAL pilots so they don't pull a us airways. You are hiding your windfall behind a policy that is unfair. You can claim bructia created it, but reread his testimony. He clearly states what his position on this was. I would just love to hear a logical reason a furloughed pilot should go ahead of an active pilot. 73 fo then and 73 fo now. Do you really believe it that's simple.
Now they have bonus seniority. |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 1532080)
Did you just call someone a SCAB because of his position given to him by an arbitrator?? WTH is wrong with you?
|
@Ben,
Did your father scab? |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1532508)
I see no windfall. Pilots at CAL were mostly paired with UAL pilots that had far greater seniority. The pilots ahead of me had less seniority pre-merger.
Now they have bonus seniority. |
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 1532517)
@Ben,
Did your father scab? |
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 1532361)
We would ALL have gotten a much better contract had that not been the case. Jay Delay and the CAL tactics made this unpalatable agreement acceptable to a whole bunch of peeps who wouldn't have voted for it otherwise.
The CAL pilots bring so much pilot culture baggage to this merger: scabs, management friendly union and pilots, profit sharing, delayed JCBA, skewed negotiations like pay banding which are valueless in SLI but we have to live with, incompetent reps (Pierce, Baron, Cook, Sally), egregious SLI proposals, misleading communications to pilots.. the list goes on.... And guys come on here arguing BS, without having the courage to own their baggage. Thinking if they keep arguing it will change reality... |
Originally Posted by Snarge
(Post 1532534)
The insecurities and denial are astounding...
The CAL pilots bring so much pilot culture baggage to this merger: scabs, management friendly union and pilots, profit sharing, delayed JCBA, skewed negotiations like pay banding which are valueless in SLI but we have to live with, incompetent reps (Pierce, Baron, Cook, Sally), egregious SLI proposals, misleading communications to pilots.. the list goes on.... And guys come on here arguing BS, without having the courage to own their baggage. Thinking if they keep arguing it will change reality... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands