Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Vacancy Bid 1404V (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/78460-vacancy-bid-1404v.html)

pilot64golfer 12-03-2013 01:29 PM


Originally Posted by sleeves (Post 1532384)
Doubtful... MGT always has a reason why you must vote yes. We will fall for it again. It is always someone fault besides the guy who voted yes.

We've voted no at UAL before. This would have been a no contract most likely if SLI had been completed prior to the contact like DAL/NWA.

Like someone at CAL famously said "Contract come and go but SLI lasts forever."

Benwarren 12-03-2013 03:20 PM


Originally Posted by pilot64golfer (Post 1532131)
Doesn't matter. There was nothing in merger policy that said all pilots on furlough have to be placed behind all pilots not on furlough. It was a "seniority list" integration, not "active pilot" integration. Also, the most recent merger that used the new policy did the exact same thing. Pilots on furlough were placed with active pilots because it was based on longevity.

You were a guppy FO before the merger and you still are. What's the problem? You haven't dropped in status.

That itself is the problem. New policy that cuddles the UAL pilots so they don't pull a us airways. You are hiding your windfall behind a policy that is unfair. You can claim bructia created it, but reread his testimony. He clearly states what his position on this was. I would just love to hear a logical reason a furloughed pilot should go ahead of an active pilot. 73 fo then and 73 fo now. Do you really believe it that's simple.

Benwarren 12-03-2013 03:26 PM


Originally Posted by oldmako (Post 1532374)
AND the logic behind the delay, was flawed from the start. One need look no further than the ISL. So we accepted a concessionary contract full of Easter Eggs for El Heffe.

Of course, you'd actually have to read the thing, and ALPA policy, and have some sort of historical perspective, and the ability to connect dots, etc etc etc to figure this all out. But hey, we'll get em next time! Right.

That's right keeping justifying your yes vote. Just admit reality. Your group has been beatin down so long, you couldn't see past the pay rates. I like the tough guy talk from UAL, sorry all the true colors came out. Fight management, yeah right, what a joke y'all are.

pilot64golfer 12-03-2013 03:28 PM


Originally Posted by Benwarren (Post 1532502)
That itself is the problem. New policy that cuddles the UAL pilots so they don't pull a us airways. You are hiding your windfall behind a policy that is unfair. You can claim bructia created it, but reread his testimony. He clearly states what his position on this was. I would just love to hear a logical reason a furloughed pilot should go ahead of an active pilot. 73 fo then and 73 fo now. Do you really believe it that's simple.

I see no windfall. Pilots at CAL were mostly paired with UAL pilots that had far greater seniority. The pilots ahead of me had less seniority pre-merger.

Now they have bonus seniority.

Benwarren 12-03-2013 03:35 PM


Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 1532080)
Did you just call someone a SCAB because of his position given to him by an arbitrator?? WTH is wrong with you?

Can't hide behind awards, and "it's managements fault" forever. Kind of ironic, that ALPA's play at self preservation has actually created the most dysfunctional pilot group, that will not achieve unity for 20 yrs. the contract y'all so blindly voted in will be our contract for the next 10 yrs. if you think for one instant that I will ever stand united with this group you are sorely mistaken.

SpecialTracking 12-03-2013 03:37 PM

@Ben,

Did your father scab?

Benwarren 12-03-2013 03:44 PM


Originally Posted by pilot64golfer (Post 1532508)
I see no windfall. Pilots at CAL were mostly paired with UAL pilots that had far greater seniority. The pilots ahead of me had less seniority pre-merger.

Now they have bonus seniority.

What seniority are you talking about. I hope it's not hire date. I will explain it again, please put on your listening ears. Your hire date at UAL, provided your schedule, seat, and aircraft. Ours did the same at cal. But it has no bearing when groups are merged. Airlines hire at different times, go through bankruptcies, buy and sell aircraft. Your years of service at your old company don't matter in a fair lists, only what you bring to the table, so to speak. ALPA changed that to help UAL pilots. Afraid they would be voted out if y'all weren't kept happy. I can't fathom how you don't see that. Did you lose your helmet again? Insurance only covers two a year please be more careful.

Benwarren 12-03-2013 03:47 PM


Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1532517)
@Ben,

Did your father scab?

Yes. Hired in '77, crossed at some point not sure when.

Snarge 12-03-2013 03:56 PM


Originally Posted by oldmako (Post 1532361)
We would ALL have gotten a much better contract had that not been the case. Jay Delay and the CAL tactics made this unpalatable agreement acceptable to a whole bunch of peeps who wouldn't have voted for it otherwise.

The insecurities and denial are astounding...

The CAL pilots bring so much pilot culture baggage to this merger: scabs, management friendly union and pilots, profit sharing, delayed JCBA, skewed negotiations like pay banding which are valueless in SLI but we have to live with, incompetent reps (Pierce, Baron, Cook, Sally), egregious SLI proposals, misleading communications to pilots.. the list goes on....

And guys come on here arguing BS, without having the courage to own their baggage. Thinking if they keep arguing it will change reality...

Benwarren 12-03-2013 04:04 PM


Originally Posted by Snarge (Post 1532534)
The insecurities and denial are astounding...

The CAL pilots bring so much pilot culture baggage to this merger: scabs, management friendly union and pilots, profit sharing, delayed JCBA, skewed negotiations like pay banding which are valueless in SLI but we have to live with, incompetent reps (Pierce, Baron, Cook, Sally), egregious SLI proposals, misleading communications to pilots.. the list goes on....

And guys come on here arguing BS, without having the courage to own their baggage. Thinking if they keep arguing it will change reality...

Everything you just said is exactly how I feel about UAL. Like I said unity waived bye bye to this group the day SLI came out. And I will openly admit I will be fighting to keep it that way. Everyone enjoy your careers.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands