Search

Notices

Vacancy Bid 1404V

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2013 | 01:29 PM
  #241  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
Doubtful... MGT always has a reason why you must vote yes. We will fall for it again. It is always someone fault besides the guy who voted yes.
We've voted no at UAL before. This would have been a no contract most likely if SLI had been completed prior to the contact like DAL/NWA.

Like someone at CAL famously said "Contract come and go but SLI lasts forever."
Reply
Old 12-03-2013 | 03:20 PM
  #242  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
Doesn't matter. There was nothing in merger policy that said all pilots on furlough have to be placed behind all pilots not on furlough. It was a "seniority list" integration, not "active pilot" integration. Also, the most recent merger that used the new policy did the exact same thing. Pilots on furlough were placed with active pilots because it was based on longevity.

You were a guppy FO before the merger and you still are. What's the problem? You haven't dropped in status.
That itself is the problem. New policy that cuddles the UAL pilots so they don't pull a us airways. You are hiding your windfall behind a policy that is unfair. You can claim bructia created it, but reread his testimony. He clearly states what his position on this was. I would just love to hear a logical reason a furloughed pilot should go ahead of an active pilot. 73 fo then and 73 fo now. Do you really believe it that's simple.
Reply
Old 12-03-2013 | 03:26 PM
  #243  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
AND the logic behind the delay, was flawed from the start. One need look no further than the ISL. So we accepted a concessionary contract full of Easter Eggs for El Heffe.

Of course, you'd actually have to read the thing, and ALPA policy, and have some sort of historical perspective, and the ability to connect dots, etc etc etc to figure this all out. But hey, we'll get em next time! Right.
That's right keeping justifying your yes vote. Just admit reality. Your group has been beatin down so long, you couldn't see past the pay rates. I like the tough guy talk from UAL, sorry all the true colors came out. Fight management, yeah right, what a joke y'all are.
Reply
Old 12-03-2013 | 03:28 PM
  #244  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default

Originally Posted by Benwarren
That itself is the problem. New policy that cuddles the UAL pilots so they don't pull a us airways. You are hiding your windfall behind a policy that is unfair. You can claim bructia created it, but reread his testimony. He clearly states what his position on this was. I would just love to hear a logical reason a furloughed pilot should go ahead of an active pilot. 73 fo then and 73 fo now. Do you really believe it that's simple.
I see no windfall. Pilots at CAL were mostly paired with UAL pilots that had far greater seniority. The pilots ahead of me had less seniority pre-merger.

Now they have bonus seniority.
Reply
Old 12-03-2013 | 03:35 PM
  #245  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
Did you just call someone a SCAB because of his position given to him by an arbitrator?? WTH is wrong with you?
Can't hide behind awards, and "it's managements fault" forever. Kind of ironic, that ALPA's play at self preservation has actually created the most dysfunctional pilot group, that will not achieve unity for 20 yrs. the contract y'all so blindly voted in will be our contract for the next 10 yrs. if you think for one instant that I will ever stand united with this group you are sorely mistaken.
Reply
Old 12-03-2013 | 03:37 PM
  #246  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

@Ben,

Did your father scab?
Reply
Old 12-03-2013 | 03:44 PM
  #247  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
I see no windfall. Pilots at CAL were mostly paired with UAL pilots that had far greater seniority. The pilots ahead of me had less seniority pre-merger.

Now they have bonus seniority.
What seniority are you talking about. I hope it's not hire date. I will explain it again, please put on your listening ears. Your hire date at UAL, provided your schedule, seat, and aircraft. Ours did the same at cal. But it has no bearing when groups are merged. Airlines hire at different times, go through bankruptcies, buy and sell aircraft. Your years of service at your old company don't matter in a fair lists, only what you bring to the table, so to speak. ALPA changed that to help UAL pilots. Afraid they would be voted out if y'all weren't kept happy. I can't fathom how you don't see that. Did you lose your helmet again? Insurance only covers two a year please be more careful.
Reply
Old 12-03-2013 | 03:47 PM
  #248  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
@Ben,

Did your father scab?
Yes. Hired in '77, crossed at some point not sure when.
Reply
Old 12-03-2013 | 03:56 PM
  #249  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
We would ALL have gotten a much better contract had that not been the case. Jay Delay and the CAL tactics made this unpalatable agreement acceptable to a whole bunch of peeps who wouldn't have voted for it otherwise.
The insecurities and denial are astounding...

The CAL pilots bring so much pilot culture baggage to this merger: scabs, management friendly union and pilots, profit sharing, delayed JCBA, skewed negotiations like pay banding which are valueless in SLI but we have to live with, incompetent reps (Pierce, Baron, Cook, Sally), egregious SLI proposals, misleading communications to pilots.. the list goes on....

And guys come on here arguing BS, without having the courage to own their baggage. Thinking if they keep arguing it will change reality...
Reply
Old 12-03-2013 | 04:04 PM
  #250  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Snarge
The insecurities and denial are astounding...

The CAL pilots bring so much pilot culture baggage to this merger: scabs, management friendly union and pilots, profit sharing, delayed JCBA, skewed negotiations like pay banding which are valueless in SLI but we have to live with, incompetent reps (Pierce, Baron, Cook, Sally), egregious SLI proposals, misleading communications to pilots.. the list goes on....

And guys come on here arguing BS, without having the courage to own their baggage. Thinking if they keep arguing it will change reality...
Everything you just said is exactly how I feel about UAL. Like I said unity waived bye bye to this group the day SLI came out. And I will openly admit I will be fighting to keep it that way. Everyone enjoy your careers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SpreadEagle
Regional
60
08-23-2013 12:53 PM
pilotgolfer
United
46
02-10-2013 10:08 PM
HerkDriver
Cargo
5
09-18-2007 01:56 PM
Coffee Bitch
Cargo
115
05-23-2007 08:02 AM
Diesel 10
Cargo
1
08-11-2005 11:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices