Notices

Avoid with bid-failed

Old 06-26-2015 | 08:13 AM
  #31  
Lerxst's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: B787 CA - SFO
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
Sounds like Lou and Sue. Agree, Sue was awesome. No wonder they got divorced.
Ha! I remember standing next to angry Lou waiting on a hotel van one night in our B1900 days when he suddenly yells out "Hey! go suck on that cancer stick someplace else, fattie!" to some poor girl like 30 feet away.
Reply
Old 06-29-2015 | 09:04 AM
  #32  
SeamusTheHound's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 384
Likes: 3
From: 757/767 First Officer
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
Everyone should re-read what DF wrote above. This will keep you out of trouble and will eventually offer an avenue for relieve. If on the other hand, you don't care about getting in trouble or want instant relieve, invite the offender out behind the hangar.

Your Mama probably told you that you are not going to like everybody and not everyone is going to like you but you should try to get along anyway. And, you should not launder your dirty underwear in public. Threads like this demonstrate that she knew what she was talking about. (A public forum is NO PLACE to air this out PERIOD)

At the 50% level, if you can't avoid flying with your unfavored Captain maybe a good education on PBS bidding is in order or maybe you have too many "avoid flying with" on your bid and that may require a little self-reflection instead.
I disagree here to some extent. Interpersonal conflicts are often very subtle, and there is a tendency, even among experienced first officers, to ask the question, "Is it me, or is it this other person?"

Sometimes it's helpful to bounce these experiences off of a colleague. These boards, albeit public, allow some of us to share those experiences and get some much needed feedback. Naming names, although tempting, may not be the best course, but seeking advice and finding you are not alone can be very therapeutic.

My 2 cents.
Reply
Old 07-08-2015 | 12:45 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg
The purpose of Pro-Stans is to mediate these problems by having a conversation with both parties and eventually bringing them together in a conversation with Pro-stans being a neutral party and thus the conversation is solution driven. Pro-Stans should be analyzing these "do-not-fly-with Captains. Determining who these Captains are who continually show up these lists and make a preemptive "strike" by making a call and asking the Captain why they are so popular on the do-not-fly list. A phone call may give notice that the Captain needs to self-evaluate their behavior with regard to their crew environment. Then, when an FO says that "we need to have a conversation"; the Captain will know that he needs to change. I always say a leopard never changes his spots but you never know.
I would be mortified to know if I was on some FO's do-not-fly list but chances are good that I have surely angered somebody along the way and have made the list. I'm hoping it is a very short list
Pros Stans should be the next to last resort. Someone needs to grow a spine and learn to work out some interpersonal problems themselves as a first resort.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
TonyC
Cargo
32
05-08-2013 02:10 PM
tsquare
Major
358
08-07-2010 12:14 PM
R1200RT
Cargo
36
01-09-2008 06:26 AM
HerkDriver
Cargo
5
09-18-2007 01:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices