Base Trade 737 CA
08-03-2015 | 12:29 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
That ridiculous proposal was the best thing that could have ever happened. It allowed the other side to present whatever they wanted. I wouldn't be surprised to see that nobody wants to take credit for crafting that gem of a SLI proposal. 1-for-1? We should buy Alaska and then propose 1-for-1. Would people still believe that all Captains are the same? And we must be overstaffed because we have so many pilots and they offered COLA to the entire pilot group. Yep we're overstaffed.
Turns out the fences didn't really work as planned. 0 LCAL pilots on the 747 and 26 LUAL pilots on the 787, including the top 8 FOs in SFO. Its just going to get worse when the fence falls completely. Especially in LAX.
I can see why no one wants to take credit for that SLI proposal. I'll bet if you asked any of them they'd claim it was one of the other members that really wanted it and not them. They probably wanted to actually use the union policy and not make their own up.
Turns out the fences didn't really work as planned. 0 LCAL pilots on the 747 and 26 LUAL pilots on the 787, including the top 8 FOs in SFO. Its just going to get worse when the fence falls completely. Especially in LAX.
I can see why no one wants to take credit for that SLI proposal. I'll bet if you asked any of them they'd claim it was one of the other members that really wanted it and not them. They probably wanted to actually use the union policy and not make their own up.
This has to do with the guy getting a trade how again?
08-03-2015 | 01:55 PM
#22
Banned
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
08-03-2015 | 06:24 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: 73 CA EWR
08-03-2015 | 06:53 PM
#24
Don't say Guppy
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
08-04-2015 | 03:10 AM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
That ridiculous proposal was the best thing that could have ever happened. It allowed the other side to present whatever they wanted. I wouldn't be surprised to see that nobody wants to take credit for crafting that gem of a SLI proposal. 1-for-1? We should buy Alaska and then propose 1-for-1. Would people still believe that all Captains are the same? And we must be overstaffed because we have so many pilots and they offered COLA to the entire pilot group. Yep we're overstaffed.
Turns out the fences didn't really work as planned. 0 LCAL pilots on the 747 and 26 LUAL pilots on the 787, including the top 8 FOs in SFO. Its just going to get worse when the fence falls completely. Especially in LAX.
I can see why no one wants to take credit for that SLI proposal. I'll bet if you asked any of them they'd claim it was one of the other members that really wanted it and not them. They probably wanted to actually use the union policy and not make their own up.
Turns out the fences didn't really work as planned. 0 LCAL pilots on the 747 and 26 LUAL pilots on the 787, including the top 8 FOs in SFO. Its just going to get worse when the fence falls completely. Especially in LAX.
I can see why no one wants to take credit for that SLI proposal. I'll bet if you asked any of them they'd claim it was one of the other members that really wanted it and not them. They probably wanted to actually use the union policy and not make their own up.
Last edited by intrepidcv11; 08-04-2015 at 03:34 AM.
08-04-2015 | 07:40 AM
#28
Banned
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
It's understandable that you can't help yourself when you consistently jump in to threads with wild unfounded acquisition. Is it a form of Tourette's syndrome?
It could be as simple as not understanding or accepting the history of United Airlines. Would you care to repeat your claim of flying with a pilot from the "Tracy Ace" group. And here in this thread you imply that the 570 were Scabs. Would you care to expand on your knowledge of the different groups during that period. I'll give you the titles - strikers, SCABS, fleet qualified, 570 and the 539.
I don't know or understand the problems you have and how the manifest themselves but the simple fact that you've attacked several posters with claims of being Staller, your nemesis, may be a reason for concern. I know several fine CAL people and many UAL people that have come to accept who they are and where they come from, maybe it's time you do the same and move forward.
It could be as simple as not understanding or accepting the history of United Airlines. Would you care to repeat your claim of flying with a pilot from the "Tracy Ace" group. And here in this thread you imply that the 570 were Scabs. Would you care to expand on your knowledge of the different groups during that period. I'll give you the titles - strikers, SCABS, fleet qualified, 570 and the 539.
I don't know or understand the problems you have and how the manifest themselves but the simple fact that you've attacked several posters with claims of being Staller, your nemesis, may be a reason for concern. I know several fine CAL people and many UAL people that have come to accept who they are and where they come from, maybe it's time you do the same and move forward.
Last edited by AllenAllert; 08-04-2015 at 07:58 AM.
08-04-2015 | 05:26 PM
#29
Don't say Guppy
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
It's understandable that you can't help yourself when you consistently jump in to threads with wild unfounded acquisition. Is it a form of Tourette's syndrome?
It could be as simple as not understanding or accepting the history of United Airlines. Would you care to repeat your claim of flying with a pilot from the "Tracy Ace" group. And here in this thread you imply that the 570 were Scabs. Would you care to expand on your knowledge of the different groups during that period. I'll give you the titles - strikers, SCABS, fleet qualified, 570 and the 539.
I don't know or understand the problems you have and how the manifest themselves but the simple fact that you've attacked several posters with claims of being Staller, your nemesis, may be a reason for concern. I know several fine CAL people and many UAL people that have come to accept who they are and where they come from, maybe it's time you do the same and move forward.
It could be as simple as not understanding or accepting the history of United Airlines. Would you care to repeat your claim of flying with a pilot from the "Tracy Ace" group. And here in this thread you imply that the 570 were Scabs. Would you care to expand on your knowledge of the different groups during that period. I'll give you the titles - strikers, SCABS, fleet qualified, 570 and the 539.
I don't know or understand the problems you have and how the manifest themselves but the simple fact that you've attacked several posters with claims of being Staller, your nemesis, may be a reason for concern. I know several fine CAL people and many UAL people that have come to accept who they are and where they come from, maybe it's time you do the same and move forward.
I wait, with baited breath, for whatever new online name you come up with next.
08-05-2015 | 10:41 AM
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Thanks for your input as always Mensa. Thankfully 99.999% of UAL guys are not as full of it or themselves as you appear on this site. Clearly it is too much to ask that you move on as most have already instead of celebrating fence counts and continuously reminding us how you were once a junior 727 capt.
Bye all.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
