Search

Notices

TA Passes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2015 | 11:54 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Default

Originally Posted by Yak02
Take this deal!!!



CAL Captain John Prater become head of ALPA several years ago and he was going to "Take it back" and make pilots respectable again. Well he didn't. Ask him, ALPA is obsolete, broken, and can't be fixed.The ALPA tool box is worn out and holds nothing. The ALPA playbook is from doing business in the 1970's it isn't going to change.

Wow, if Prater actually said that he admits he is really dense or just self centered. One thing is for sure, he is no Rene Minjares. He tried telling Prater and all the chest beaters like Prater that very thing years ago when he put is job on the line to start an independent union at CA.

As much as anyone else and more than most, Prater is responsible for CAL being part of ALPA again. The presidency was his pay back.
Reply
Old 12-23-2015 | 12:03 PM
  #52  
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
Stuck Mic
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Default

I have a hope that with the ability to get paid for extensions, as well as the FRMS waiver that maybe life on reserve might slightly improve. With those two things available assuming the TA passes, the need for excessive short call coverage should be reduced. Just a wet dream probably, but something I thought made sense.

As to the fight to improve reserve assignment process, it sounds like they were too far apart. Would you accept a maximum number short calls being able to be assigned in exchange for having a 1201 report time on day 1 instead of 1000. And maybe get paid a few hours for a FSB assignment in exchange for not being released on your last day until 2359 if you next day off was a FDO or RDO or VDO?
Reply
Old 12-23-2015 | 12:04 PM
  #53  
Yak02's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: B-787 Captain
Default

Your right Prater is all you said, that's why he got the position. That is exactly ALPA and is the reason to get the hell out of it.
Reply
Old 12-23-2015 | 12:30 PM
  #54  
(retired)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Default

All of institutional, organized labor is going the way of the dodo bird in corporate America. Participation has been steadily decreasing for decades. It is not just an ALPA issue.
Reply
Old 12-23-2015 | 05:12 PM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Default

There you go with the anti-ALPA talk. You don't and won't have the numbers to do anything about ALPA and we'll never go back to selling each other out for personal gain - Not even with the few scabs we have would care to follow you.
Reply
Old 12-24-2015 | 04:31 AM
  #56  
(retired)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert
There you go with the anti-ALPA talk. You don't and won't have the numbers to do anything about ALPA and we'll never go back to selling each other out for personal gain - Not even with the few scabs we have would care to follow you.
The comment isn't "anti-ALPA." It is about total labor participation in the private sector which has been steadily decreasing since the 1950/60 period.

As long as the FAA exists, most large carrier transport pilots are quite likely to remain unionized in some fashion. How that all transpires into the future with the declining labor participation in general and rapidly improving airline industry technology remains to be seen. That is all.
Reply
Old 12-24-2015 | 06:32 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA
As long as the FAA exists, most large carrier transport pilots are quite likely to remain unionized in some fashion.
What do the two have to do with each other?
Reply
Old 12-24-2015 | 06:52 AM
  #58  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA
As long as the FAA exists, most large carrier transport pilots are quite likely to remain unionized in some fashion.
What do the two have to do with each other?
Can I guess? Maybe it's because without a collectively bargained contract the company would only have to comply with min FAA work rules. That's what drives pilots in startup airlines to eventually organize, despite how supposedly rosy their relationship with management is. Isn't that what Smisek said after the Buffalo accident? Hey, not my problem; they had FAA oversight and workrules, which are by definition safe, no? (No, thus FAR117)

Last edited by APC225; 12-24-2015 at 07:03 AM.
Reply
Old 12-24-2015 | 07:00 AM
  #59  
gofastmopar's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: B756 Capt Junior Lineholder
Default

Originally Posted by Kilder
Your decision is either to be pragmatic or be a dreamer....
How about both! The bird in hand , (hourly rates), and the compounding that starts 1/1/16 is substantial. The DAL "me too" clause will be in our back pockets.
The full Section 6 is an unknown of both $$$ and duration.
In the mean time , congrats to all LUAL furloughees on possibly being made whole.
It is possible that reserve improvements will be included in the next contract, but who's to know the amount of negotiating capital they require? I will also venture to say that a large percentage of reserve pilots,( new hires excluded) are voluntary not line holders.
I hope the TA passes.
Reply
Old 12-24-2015 | 07:50 AM
  #60  
(retired)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
What do the two have to do with each other?
Risk of, and FAR enforcement, Aeromedical, etc.,(among other things).

Last edited by Old UCAL CA; 12-24-2015 at 08:32 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
piperpilot12w
Major
0
06-28-2014 07:28 PM
Kayco
United
39
11-13-2012 02:18 PM
forgot to bid
Major
161
06-08-2012 12:32 AM
vagabond
Major
6
11-03-2008 11:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices