Search

Notices

Chief Storyteller

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2017 | 05:33 PM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by awax
Best contract, yep, I'm with you. Delivered largely by United pilots.
Really? The Delta contracts didn't have anything to do with it? How about the merger? How about the Delta pilots voting no on their recent TA1? ALPA E&FA? The ALPA AFL-CIO affiliation or ALPA Governmental Affairs? The NMB? The Colgan families? Lower fuel prices?
Reply
Old 03-11-2017 | 09:48 AM
  #102  
awax's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
Really? The Delta contracts didn't have anything to do with it? How about the merger? How about the Delta pilots voting no on their recent TA1? ALPA E&FA? The ALPA AFL-CIO affiliation or ALPA Governmental Affairs? The NMB? The Colgan families? Lower fuel prices?

Aren't you a rep & shouldn't you know this? The industry landscape will always present challenges and opportunities that are external to, but affect negotiations. What's important here is that United pilot negotiators still have to show up at the table aware of external risk, and ready to capitalize on externally created opportunity.
Reply
Old 03-13-2017 | 01:48 PM
  #103  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
Really? The Delta contracts didn't have anything to do with it? How about the merger? How about the Delta pilots voting no on their recent TA1? ALPA E&FA? The ALPA AFL-CIO affiliation or ALPA Governmental Affairs? The NMB? The Colgan families? Lower fuel prices?
Hardly the best contract ever and why on earth do we always rely on some other Pilot group, (see Delta), toeing the line while we cling to coat tails and vote yes at every turn? We had a chance to lead the industry when we merged but were so busy tripping over each other to "get the deal done" and stop those seat stealing CAL scum that we settled AGAIN. There are so many holes in our current CBA that could have been plugged but once more we caved and settled for much less than we should have supposedly all in the name of moving on.

Pathetic at best.
Reply
Old 03-13-2017 | 02:05 PM
  #104  
oldmako's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Hardly the best contract ever and why on earth do we always rely on some other Pilot group, (see Delta), toeing the line while we cling to coat tails and vote yes at every turn? We had a chance to lead the industry when we merged but were so busy tripping over each other to "get the deal done" and stop those seat stealing CAL scum that we settled AGAIN. There are so many holes in our current CBA that could have been plugged but once more we caved and settled for much less than we should have supposedly all in the name of moving on.

Pathetic at best.
Admittedly its still early in the year, but I'd like to highlight the above post and hoist it into the spotlight. I think it just might wind up being the post of the year. Unfortunately, far too many worship the hourly rate alone, and never stop to consider the value of powerful contractual language. Language which our recently retired pilots enjoyed in the past (while they were getting paid soft time, or enjoying more time off at home, or on vacation, etc). Unfortunately, that language was discarded considered as by-catch. Much to the glee of Willis and the board.

Last edited by oldmako; 03-13-2017 at 02:31 PM.
Reply
Old 03-13-2017 | 03:36 PM
  #105  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Duplicate post...please delete.

Last edited by pilotgolfer; 03-13-2017 at 03:55 PM.
Reply
Old 03-13-2017 | 03:38 PM
  #106  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Hardly the best contract ever and why on earth do we always rely on some other Pilot group, (see Delta), toeing the line while we cling to coat tails and vote yes at every turn? We had a chance to lead the industry when we merged but were so busy tripping over each other to "get the deal done" and stop those seat stealing CAL scum that we settled AGAIN. There are so many holes in our current CBA that could have been plugged but once more we caved and settled for much less than we should have supposedly all in the name of moving on.

Pathetic at best.

Maybe if the scummy behavior wasn't present, I would have voted no. I was a UAL guy flying on the CAL side out of EWR. Unity was on nobody's radar at the time.

Spilled milk right now.
Reply
Old 03-14-2017 | 06:05 AM
  #107  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
Maybe if the scummy behavior wasn't present, I would have voted no. I was a UAL guy flying on the CAL side out of EWR. Unity was on nobody's radar at the time.

Spilled milk right now.
So you voted Yes to spite those rotten CAL scum? Bizarre. In essence you voted in a inferior contract for the sole purpose of sticking it to the other Pilot group. Does the term short-sighted mean anything to you?

As you point out it is spilled milk but for the love of god, please keep it in your memory bank. There's no reason to ever do that again and why we did it in the first place is beyond me.
Reply
Old 03-14-2017 | 06:08 AM
  #108  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Admittedly its still early in the year, but I'd like to highlight the above post and hoist it into the spotlight. I think it just might wind up being the post of the year. Unfortunately, far too many worship the hourly rate alone, and never stop to consider the value of powerful contractual language. Language which our recently retired pilots enjoyed in the past (while they were getting paid soft time, or enjoying more time off at home, or on vacation, etc). Unfortunately, that language was discarded considered as by-catch. Much to the glee of Willis and the board.
That's been the crutch of our generation for years. Shiny pay rates supplemented with increasingly poor language. Ask the American guys about that. Pay rates are easy to regain while language never is.
Reply
Old 03-14-2017 | 06:46 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
That's been the crutch of our generation for years. Shiny pay rates supplemented with increasingly poor language. Ask the American guys about that. Pay rates are easy to regain while language never is.
Can you give us your list of contractual language improvements that you would require to vote yes on the next UPA?
Reply
Old 03-14-2017 | 06:53 AM
  #110  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
So you voted Yes to spite those rotten CAL scum? Bizarre. In essence you voted in a inferior contract for the sole purpose of sticking it to the other Pilot group. Does the term short-sighted mean anything to you?

As you point out it is spilled milk but for the love of god, please keep it in your memory bank. There's no reason to ever do that again and why we did it in the first place is beyond me.
A 2 party negotiation would have netted a better agreement. SLI should have been done first.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike734
Alaska
42
01-12-2022 12:10 AM
seattlepilot
Hiring News
0
03-23-2012 06:49 AM
UAL T38 Phlyer
Major
12
06-19-2008 09:31 AM
miker1369
JetBlue
6
03-13-2007 09:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices