Search

Notices

Chief Storyteller

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2017 | 06:54 AM
  #111  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 985
Likes: 65
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
A 2 party negotiation would have netted a better agreement. SLI should have been done first.
I think the reason they didn't do the SLI first is the USair AWA merger.
Reply
Old 03-14-2017 | 07:16 AM
  #112  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by jdt30
I think the reason they didn't do the SLI first is the USair AWA merger.
The Gold Standard of Scummy behavior.
Reply
Old 03-14-2017 | 07:24 AM
  #113  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
A 2 party negotiation would have netted a better agreement. SLI should have been done first.
I completely agree. The 3 party negotiations netted us a sub-standard agreement but it was preventable with a no vote. Not trying to beat a dead horse but we could have started the merger with the best language and highest pay rates out there and we clearly did not.

One for the history books as a lost opportunity.
Reply
Old 03-14-2017 | 07:25 AM
  #114  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
Can you give us your list of contractual language improvements that you would require to vote yes on the next UPA?
Would love to but it will take me a while to put together and will be very lengthy.
Reply
Old 03-14-2017 | 07:29 AM
  #115  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
I completely agree. The 3 party negotiations netted us a sub-standard agreement but it was preventable with a no vote. Not trying to beat a dead horse but we could have started the merger with the best language and highest pay rates out there and we clearly did not.

One for the history books as a lost opportunity.
A NO vote would have just lead to further 3 party negotiation. No point belaboring the topic. It's done. On to the next negotiation.
Reply
Old 03-14-2017 | 07:46 AM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Would love to but it will take me a while to put together and will be very lengthy.
Give us your top five or ten off the top of your head.
Reply
Old 03-14-2017 | 08:05 AM
  #117  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
A NO vote would have just lead to further 3 party negotiation. No point belaboring the topic. It's done. On to the next negotiation.
Agree, but keep it fresh in your mind for next time.
Reply
Old 03-14-2017 | 08:13 AM
  #118  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
Give us your top five or ten off the top of your head.
Reserve (total re-write)
B fund to include Profit Sharing calculations
Leg by leg overs included in trip pay protection
Airport Alert removal or higher pay quotient
Scope
Vacation improvements

This is just the tip of the iceberg, IMO and there's way more where that came from. I'll pull up my notes and add to the list later.
Reply
Old 03-15-2017 | 06:16 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Default

Negotiations in public, like a couple airing their grievances at a party. Never a good idea.
Reply
Old 03-15-2017 | 02:23 PM
  #120  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: 756 Left Side
Default

Originally Posted by Jaded N Cynical
Negotiations in public, like a couple airing their grievances at a party. Never a good idea.
It's not 'negotiating in public' if someone posts what's wrong [or was missed] in our current CBA.
IF they were to mention what they would be willing to give up.. well, then maybe you could state that the individual was starting to cross a line.

Then again- over 12000 pilots at United and less than 100 post on a regular basis. That is LESS THAN 1%!

As far as my list is concerned-
1) B76-3 pay is incorrect!
2) ANF is stated as 0230 - 0329! Incorrect!!
3) A day off should mean a day off. Should not matter if you are a reserve or lineholder. Global or Basic.
4) Field Standby?! Ok.. but it should cost something..
5) SickLeave.. 5hrs a month?!

Those are just 5 items. I have a few more. Notice I didn't mention what I would be willing to give up (or change)..

Always
Motch
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike734
Alaska
42
01-12-2022 12:10 AM
seattlepilot
Hiring News
0
03-23-2012 06:49 AM
UAL T38 Phlyer
Major
12
06-19-2008 09:31 AM
miker1369
JetBlue
6
03-13-2007 09:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices