Dec new hire class
#31
Occasional box hauler
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,684
The recent vacancy bid only had openings for 76 so any SDF 74 FO openings would have had to come from SDF 74 FOs bidding off fleet. Those resulting (recurred) openings would have then been available in this bid. 4 became available and were awarded.
New Hires are awarded vacancies based on unfilled vacancies, in this case from a previous bid. That’s how a new hire got SDF when more senior pilots want it.
Clear as mud…?
New Hires are awarded vacancies based on unfilled vacancies, in this case from a previous bid. That’s how a new hire got SDF when more senior pilots want it.
Clear as mud…?
#35
Social Media retired.
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 777
Tnkr - I agree that all open vacancies at point in time of the 22-102 Bid should have been included in the bid but also realize it’s not always that simple. Effective dates, training constraints, long term planning changes all affect the company’s ability to offer them. That and they just don’t give a F.
#37
Occasional box hauler
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,684
ANC 74 new hires who came on board after that bid, but before the most recent bid did not have a shot at that slot and are senior (perhaps by hundreds of numbers) to the guys who are getting it. My opinion is that anytime we have a system bid, every open slot from that and all previous bids should be fair game. If the company no longer wants the slot, they should be forced to delete it. Obviously, this would take a change in contractual language. We don’t get things here out of the goodness of the company’s heart.
#38
maxing the min/Moderator
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757
Posts: 1,356
ANC 74 new hires who came on board after that bid, but before the most recent bid did not have a shot at that slot and are senior (perhaps by hundreds of numbers) to the guys who are getting it. My opinion is that anytime we have a system bid, every open slot from that and all previous bids should be fair game. If the company no longer wants the slot, they should be forced to delete it. Obviously, this would take a change in contractual language. We don’t get things here out of the goodness of the company’s heart.
I am sure the company would love the opportunity to delete slots at their whim..right now we force them to use them within 18 months I believe..thats for a reason.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post