UPS 2024 Hiring Info.
#181
Pretty much every ANC MD reservist was extended every time.
I’m not sure how much cost would factor into their decision based off prior experience.
#182
Nothing personal taken.
I'm always leery of speaking in absolutes like "never", as every single possibility can't possibly be considered and the one you didn't think of can bite you in the behind. I'm pretty sure nobody had a global pandemic on their bingo card in summer of 2016. And yeah, when we were hundreds of bodies understaffed in 21/22 extensions into days off for both reserves and lineholders were utilized on a daily basis, especially in the international theater. This is one of those things that the pandemic put a bazillion lumen spotlight on and should be addressed in bargaining, as frequently taking people into their days off has a massive negative impact on individual QOL. I don't think that's generally happening much these days as the pendelum has swung back the other way, but it does happen internationally (as it did before the pandemic).
What I can say from experience is in the Hall of Silos, Planning and Day of Ops are very distinct and very partitioned. Cost is absolutely considered on the planning side of things, where the Solver lives and pay factors can have a tangible impact on bid packages. When it comes to Day of Ops, however, the spice will flow and they'll do just about whatever the contract allows (and some that it doesn't) to move metal.
To move the needle substantively on QOL, a rewrite isn't necessary...rather targeted complementary changes in planning (13.A-B), day of ops (13.E), and schedule manipulation (13.D). Pay factors are an additional factor that can play a role in the planning area.
I'm always leery of speaking in absolutes like "never", as every single possibility can't possibly be considered and the one you didn't think of can bite you in the behind. I'm pretty sure nobody had a global pandemic on their bingo card in summer of 2016. And yeah, when we were hundreds of bodies understaffed in 21/22 extensions into days off for both reserves and lineholders were utilized on a daily basis, especially in the international theater. This is one of those things that the pandemic put a bazillion lumen spotlight on and should be addressed in bargaining, as frequently taking people into their days off has a massive negative impact on individual QOL. I don't think that's generally happening much these days as the pendelum has swung back the other way, but it does happen internationally (as it did before the pandemic).
What I can say from experience is in the Hall of Silos, Planning and Day of Ops are very distinct and very partitioned. Cost is absolutely considered on the planning side of things, where the Solver lives and pay factors can have a tangible impact on bid packages. When it comes to Day of Ops, however, the spice will flow and they'll do just about whatever the contract allows (and some that it doesn't) to move metal.
To move the needle substantively on QOL, a rewrite isn't necessary...rather targeted complementary changes in planning (13.A-B), day of ops (13.E), and schedule manipulation (13.D). Pay factors are an additional factor that can play a role in the planning area.
#183
Nothing personal taken.
I'm always leery of speaking in absolutes like "never", as every single possibility can't possibly be considered and the one you didn't think of can bite you in the behind. I'm pretty sure nobody had a global pandemic on their bingo card in summer of 2016. And yeah, when we were hundreds of bodies understaffed in 21/22 extensions into days off for both reserves and lineholders were utilized on a daily basis, especially in the international theater. This is one of those things that the pandemic put a bazillion lumen spotlight on and should be addressed in bargaining, as frequently taking people into their days off has a massive negative impact on individual QOL. I don't think that's generally happening much these days as the pendelum has swung back the other way, but it does happen internationally (as it did before the pandemic).
I'm always leery of speaking in absolutes like "never", as every single possibility can't possibly be considered and the one you didn't think of can bite you in the behind. I'm pretty sure nobody had a global pandemic on their bingo card in summer of 2016. And yeah, when we were hundreds of bodies understaffed in 21/22 extensions into days off for both reserves and lineholders were utilized on a daily basis, especially in the international theater. This is one of those things that the pandemic put a bazillion lumen spotlight on and should be addressed in bargaining, as frequently taking people into their days off has a massive negative impact on individual QOL. I don't think that's generally happening much these days as the pendelum has swung back the other way, but it does happen internationally (as it did before the pandemic).
#187
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 73
Another one incoming. EVERY hour of credit over 75 hours, which is our guarantee be paid at 150%. STOP the FORCED overtime.
#188
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 73
Not sure and dont care. So what's your point? I fly night freight with batteries that burn 2000 degrees. 3 leg night sort flying. Company just paid the teamsters 35%, etc. etc. You better up your standards.
#189
Derby boiiiii
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 98
swa was 29% on DOS and 50% over 5 years. 35% is high but not unreasonable.
#190
Question. Why would a 3.5/1 rig improve quality of life? In all seriousness, will it change the domestic week on/off? Sun-Sat, call it 144 TAFB= 41.2hrs. They would still be under the 86 hour pay period cap.
It would help int'l, but not domestic.
It would help int'l, but not domestic.
Last edited by Swedish Blender; 03-06-2024 at 02:10 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post