![]() |
Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
(Post 3805276)
Money is never a given and work rules will be a huge fight. Our pay will need to increase by roughly 25% to keep pace with the legacies, our pension by roughly 20% to keep pace with inflation since 2016 contract signing, and you are familiar with work rule improvements desired (some of which are win/win and some not so much). A lot rides on the macro economic environment and who is in the CEO seat. Carole appears to be reasonably amenable to rewarding labor. However, that can change quickly. Long story short, I’m not counting my chickens just yet.
|
Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
(Post 3805276)
Money is never a given and work rules will be a huge fight. Our pay will need to increase by roughly 25% to keep pace with the legacies, our pension by roughly 20% to keep pace with inflation since 2016 contract signing, and you are familiar with work rule improvements desired (some of which are win/win and some not so much). A lot rides on the macro economic environment and who is in the CEO seat. Carole appears to be reasonably amenable to rewarding labor. However, that can change quickly. Long story short, I’m not counting my chickens just yet.
|
Originally Posted by Lowslung
(Post 3805844)
This. Anyone who thinks any part of this contract will be a "given" is either very new and inexperienced, or kidding themselves. We've given up a full negotiation cycle. The company surely sees this as a huge win and I can guarantee that they are NOT planning on allowing us to make up two contracts' worth of gains. We have a huge hill to climb and are facing an entrenched, well armed, determined, and veteran adversary. I expect this thing will be a huge fight & will be pleasantry surprised if we have anything remotely worth voting on within the next five years. We should all be prepared for the long fight & come fully to terms with the difficulties of the road ahead.
|
Originally Posted by Precontact
(Post 3805905)
Why did the company agree to early negotiations?
|
Originally Posted by Precontact
(Post 3805905)
Why did the company agree to early negotiations?
|
Originally Posted by FTv3
(Post 3805976)
Probably to demonstrate to the eventual NMB that they are being cooperative.
I’m cautiously optimistic, but at the end of the day I know what it will take to get my yes vote, what I would vote no for, and what would drive me to actively campaign against a TA. Hopefully, the EB won’t endorse a TA that would result in the latter two options. They have our survey feedback, so this shouldn’t be rocket science, aside from convincing the company to sign off on a good contract. That might be rocket science. |
Originally Posted by Precontact
(Post 3805905)
Why did the company agree to early negotiations?
Think about when the legacies start their next contract talks. |
Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
(Post 3806279)
Think about when the legacies start their next contract talks.
|
Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
(Post 3806279)
Think about when the legacies start their next contract talks.
|
Originally Posted by PointBreak
(Post 3806595)
UPS has made it clear that they DO NOT want to bargain with the IPA and the Teamsters simultaneously. Or at least that’s what they have claimed. I’m not sure of the exact date of expiration of the Teamsters contract is and I have heard that the Teamster will not negotiate until ours is finished.
Teamsters sure as **** won't wait around for IPA to finish negotiations, not sure why IPA waited for the teamsters to finish. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:18 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands