![]() |
I'm not sure we'll have a ratified TA in the next 14+ months...but I also don't think its gonna be 4-5 years like some others have pontificated.
|
Originally Posted by skek
(Post 3808451)
Negative. It was in lieu of retro pay. Precedent set in 2006. Stayed the same with Contract 2016
|
Originally Posted by jetlaggy
(Post 3808621)
That would shock me as well.
|
Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
(Post 3808322)
Long story short we traded for small pay raises now rather than a larger retro package later. There were reasons, but don’t expect to see a significant lump sum retro unless negotiations go longer than two years.
|
Originally Posted by Flybynight101
(Post 3808724)
Umm no! We got pay raises for extending the contract. It was never sold as money now instead of a contract bonus later.
|
Doubtful...what I read was that any kind of serious negotiations were not gonna start either way.
|
Originally Posted by jetlaggy
(Post 3808909)
Doubtful...what I read was that any kind of serious negotiations were not gonna start either way.
Without Extension 2020, our contract would have become amendable in September 2021 with the contract stipulating negotiations beginning Sept 2020. Thing is, in Sept 2020 we were all neck deep in global pandemic BS and "keeping the global economy moving", so it is probably safe to say negotiations would not have started until mid-2021. We can look to our Purple brethren's experience: their negotiations began May 2021, mediated negotiations started October 2022, TA reached May 2023 which was rejected by the membership. And critically important to remember - FDX didn't have the NLRB-governed Teamsters negotiations to deal with like we did. Now, had we been in mediated negotiations would the NMB have paused mediated sessions due to Teamsters? There's little sense in speculating, but I personally think the possibility of that would have been pretty high. Either way, I don't believe we'd have ratified a TA nor do I think we'd have one imminent. We'd still be at $337.65/yr top rate during a period of high inflation, with a MASSIVE hourly rate hole to dig out of like FDX has, with a multi-year negotiations assessment on top of that...to say nothing about lost DC contributions, extending/increasing the Flat Dollar Amount, and making summer vacation percentages effective for seven months vs. five. All academic FOMO talk at this point really, as both extensions passed with 90%+ and we start negotiations next week. |
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 3808910)
They wouldn't have.
Without Extension 2020, our contract would have become amendable in September 2021 with the contract stipulating negotiations beginning Sept 2020. Thing is, in Sept 2020 we were all neck deep in global pandemic BS and "keeping the global economy moving", so it is probably safe to say negotiations would not have started until mid-2021. We can look to our Purple brethren's experience: their negotiations began May 2021, mediated negotiations started October 2022, TA reached May 2023 which was rejected by the membership. And critically important to remember - FDX didn't have the NLRB-governed Teamsters negotiations to deal with like we did. Now, had we been in mediated negotiations would the NMB have paused mediated sessions due to Teamsters? There's little sense in speculating, but I personally think the possibility of that would have been pretty high. Either way, I don't believe we'd have ratified a TA nor do I think we'd have one imminent. We'd still be at $337.65/yr top rate during a period of high inflation, with a MASSIVE hourly rate hole to dig out of like FDX has, with a multi-year negotiations assessment on top of that...to say nothing about lost DC contributions, extending/increasing the Flat Dollar Amount, and making summer vacation percentages effective for seven months vs. five. All academic FOMO talk at this point really, as both extensions passed with 90%+ and we start negotiations next week. |
Originally Posted by JustInFacts
(Post 3809228)
well, you better get this done in 12 months before you are in the same boat.
Well off to a decent start with earlier than expected negotiations.....prob got cpl years before teamsters start up again. |
Originally Posted by JustInFacts
(Post 3809228)
Your Purble brethren were negotiating during COVID as well. We had a contract that was amendable in November of 2021. We started our negotiations 6 months prior to the amendable date per the terms of our contract.
https://www.alpa.org/news-and-events/news-room/2024-05-30-fedex-pilots-informational-picket-memphis May 2021 is later than September 2020, and pretty close to "mid-2021". We would not have started negotiating in September 2020 regardless due to the pandemic. Yes, our 2020 extension did not exceed Delta until Sept 2022, but our rates achieved in the 2022 extension were industry leading at that time...they were eclipsed by pattern bargaining starting in early 2023. That's a good thing for everybody, right? FDX ALPA wasn't able to pattern off of Delta rates ratified months earlier, and as I showed in a post during your TA vote that showed if your TA'd payrates were weighted 82%WB/18%NB they were almost identical to UPS extension payrates. If you are suggesting that the NMB would agree that your contract should have to wait for 3+ years because the company was concerned about the teamsters I'm saying 1. without the 2020 Extension, negotiations would have had a delayed start due to the pandemic, and 2. it is possible the NMB would have in some capacity paused mediated negotiation sessions while the Company was dealing with NLRB-governed Teamsters negotiations, a factor that no other airline including FDX has to deal with. The first is a fact borne out of "Act of God", the second is a personal gut feeling but hey, I've been wrong before. Recapping:
If you want to blame UPS/IPA contract extensions for FDX ALPA's failure to pattern off payrates Delta AIP'd in December 2022, well, knock yourself out if that gives you a boogeyman. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands