Search

Notices

2017 UPS Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-2017 | 06:45 AM
  #741  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Default

Since there is no shortage of applicants, I can understand why your company would not want to increse pay for newbies. I think it is a Union issue that needs to be negotiated. Unfortunately, it sounds like the Union is not interested in negotiating it and popular opinion is for people to suck it up. Sad.
Reply
Old 08-11-2017 | 06:48 AM
  #742  
Tanker-driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Default

Ahhh, the old "I put up with it, so so should you!" argument. Not an excuse. Look at it this way: We all have an interest in attracting the best quality people to this place because they're who we're going to have to work with until we retire. $35-$40K a year will turn some (maybe many) good candidates away in the current hiring environment. It is in our interest to fix this in the next contract.


Originally Posted by whalesurfer
Fair enough KME and to be clear, yes, I wish our first year pay was significantly higher! However, for years and years it was $28K and back then people had families, kids, mortgages, etc. just like they do now. This is nothing new.
In fact, one could say that the current 1st year pay is significantly higher than just a decade or so ago.

According to this inflation calculator $28,000 in 2005 dollars equals $35,094.77 in 2017 dollars. So almost $10,000 less than what new hires get today.. (converted to 2017 $s)
No matter what number you settle on there will always be those who say it's too low.

So while I applaud you for knowing what your personal limits are I still contend that no one should ever plan his or her future based on the probationary pay.

Inflation Calculator | Find US Dollar's Value from 1913-2017
Reply
Old 08-11-2017 | 06:51 AM
  #743  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DrunkIrishman
Since there is no shortage of applicants, I can understand why your company would not want to increse pay for newbies. I think it is a Union issue that needs to be negotiated. Unfortunately, it sounds like the Union is not interested in negotiating it and popular opinion is for people to suck it up. Sad.
What's sad are your baseless "it sounds like the union is not interested" accusations.
Reply
Old 08-11-2017 | 06:54 AM
  #744  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tanker-driver
Ahhh, the old "I put up with it, so so should you!" argument. Not an excuse. .
You have a very selective view of what I wrote.

The main premise of my post was that a brown wannabe should try to find a way to make the first year pay work because it pays off in the long run. Period. It's low and we all know it. However, don't let the first year pay dictate your future. That was true in 1998, 2005 and still is in 2017. That was my only point.

The dollar figures were mentioned simply to show that the first year pay is actually higher now than it was a decade ago. That's a fact. I never said I was happy with those numbers, read my post again because I was very clear about that, I simply brought up the fact that the pay has actually improved from what it used to be, once again, a fact. You are the one who chose to put words in my mouth.

Last edited by whalesurfer; 08-11-2017 at 07:07 AM.
Reply
Old 08-11-2017 | 08:17 AM
  #745  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 130
Default 2017 UPS Hiring

Originally Posted by DrunkIrishman
I think it is a Union issue that needs to be negotiated. Unfortunately, it sounds like the Union is not interested in negotiating it and popular opinion is for people to suck it up. Sad.

As I mentioned upthread, the IPA attempted to negotiate higher pay for first-year pilots beyond the 14.65% DOS raise everybody got; UPS wasn't interested in doing so. UPS also wasn't interested in slightly lowering the 2nd year rate to increase the first year rate (which would cost NO money, and actually save them a little in second year defined contribution payments).

Put another way, here is a quote I was told over a decade ago by a UPS manager: "Second year pay-on is what the IPA can negotiate, first year pay is what UPS thinks you are worth."
Reply
Old 08-11-2017 | 09:07 AM
  #746  
CactusCrew's Avatar
Tri-tanic operator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
From: Doggie
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP

Put another way, here is a quote I was told over a decade ago by a UPS manager: "Second year pay-on is what the IPA can negotiate, first year pay is what UPS thinks you are worth."

They probably think 1st year pay is too much

Reply
Old 08-11-2017 | 10:03 AM
  #747  
Airbum's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 674
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
As I mentioned upthread, the IPA attempted to negotiate higher pay for first-year pilots beyond the 14.65% DOS raise everybody got; UPS wasn't interested in doing so. UPS also wasn't interested in slightly lowering the 2nd year rate to increase the first year rate (which would cost NO money, and actually save them a little in second year defined contribution payments).

Put another way, here is a quote I was told over a decade ago by a UPS manager: "Second year pay-on is what the IPA can negotiate, first year pay is what UPS thinks you are worth."
the truth has a certain ring to it doesn't it.
Reply
Old 08-11-2017 | 12:02 PM
  #748  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 FO
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
We even drank boxed wine - the horror - somehow we persevered.

It was the Formaldehyde in the box wine that "persevered" you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 08-11-2017 | 01:24 PM
  #749  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Starting pay was 26k. Not 28. I had a wife and child when I was hired. I left my previous company as a senior captain on the 747.

Taking that pay cut was a no brainer. And my wife was not rich by any means when I took that pay cut.

A potential new hire needs to take a long view. Second year pay will be easily 200k. The probationary pay, while 10k or so low as "industry standard", should not prevent anyone from applying.

Someone saying 10k is a deal breaker? This is not correct thinking.
Reply
Old 08-11-2017 | 01:50 PM
  #750  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Default

I hope that hiring isn't predicated on getting the rest of the JAL 767s. That ain't happening now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1st Supersonic
Atlas/Polar
20693
04-29-2026 07:35 AM
jlg79
Cargo
160
05-24-2014 09:27 AM
767pilot
Cargo
115
10-15-2009 06:19 PM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM
Cujo
Cargo
4
10-01-2007 10:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices