Tool of the day
#3591
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: N/A
Posts: 578
#3592
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
#3594
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Yep... they are TOTD, but the union officials who are silent on this issue are thus condoning such behaviour, thus they too are TsOTD
#3595
Now I know all you guys are going to jump on me and call me a tool etc. That's fine. But, for the sake of argument, consider this:
For the purposes of my argument one assumption has to be made and I think it's a valid assumption: A trip that is unassigned, in open time etc., one way or another, is going to be assigned to someone.
So, why not let someone who wants to fly that trip fly it instead of it being inversely assigned to someone who doesn't want to fly it? Especially over a holiday like Christmas?? I get it that, if you have furloughs, you want those pilots back off the street but if the trip is going to be flown one way or another, why not have it be flown by one that wants to do it instead of someone who doesn't?
The only way it might help furloughs is if the trip goes unflown, no-oped. Then it might help them. How often does this happen???
Please show me where I'm wrong!
Fire away!! (I'm leaving town before you guys "get a rope!")
Denny (Not a big overtime flyer) Crane
For the purposes of my argument one assumption has to be made and I think it's a valid assumption: A trip that is unassigned, in open time etc., one way or another, is going to be assigned to someone.
So, why not let someone who wants to fly that trip fly it instead of it being inversely assigned to someone who doesn't want to fly it? Especially over a holiday like Christmas?? I get it that, if you have furloughs, you want those pilots back off the street but if the trip is going to be flown one way or another, why not have it be flown by one that wants to do it instead of someone who doesn't?
The only way it might help furloughs is if the trip goes unflown, no-oped. Then it might help them. How often does this happen???
Please show me where I'm wrong!
Fire away!! (I'm leaving town before you guys "get a rope!")
Denny (Not a big overtime flyer) Crane
#3597
#3599
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
#3600
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
So, why not let someone who wants to fly that trip fly it instead of it being inversely assigned to someone who doesn't want to fly it? Especially over a holiday like Christmas?? I get it that, if you have furloughs, you want those pilots back off the street but if the trip is going to be flown one way or another, why not have it be flown by one that wants to do it instead of someone who doesn't?
The only way it might help furloughs is if the trip goes unflown, no-oped. Then it might help them. How often does this happen???
Fire away!! Denny (Not a big overtime flyer) Crane
The only way it might help furloughs is if the trip goes unflown, no-oped. Then it might help them. How often does this happen???
Fire away!! Denny (Not a big overtime flyer) Crane
Just my two cents... Now where did I put that VSOP?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post