Search

Notices
Air Wisconsin Regional Airline

Air Wisconsin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2014 | 06:57 PM
  #671  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Inside DEENA
The rumor (take it for what it's worth) is that AA has offered to paint our fleet at no charge, but that we will have to wait until all the other AA aircraft are done. Or they can pay for it themselves.

Only a rumor, though.

ID
Yeah they want you guys to wait til the end of 2015 after all the other ones are done and about the same time your contract is up so they can save that money .Why paint 71 planes that you don't plan on keeping? Better wake up son.
Reply
Old 07-31-2014 | 07:01 PM
  #672  
Inside DEENA's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CAirBear
You bring up a good point. In recurrent, a couple months ago, we were talking about the iPad program. They were talking about how each plane was going to have 2 of them, but that the CAs was going to be hotwired directly into one of the BUSSES as to be charging automatically. The cost was estimated at $6,000 a plane. Obviously this hasn't happened yet, but if it does it seems pointless to go through with this if you know your not going to be around come 2017. Also the entire fleet getting the leather seat covers is definitely costing money as well. Again why do this for only a few years?

Finally while there may, or may not be GROWTH (ie new planes), but there is serious serious MOVEMENT. I have been here 14 months and have moved up 108 spots. Im less than 200 from an upgrade right now and there have been 350 pilots hired below me. Talk about insane. This fall will be very very interesting. We have been losing between 15-20 or so this summer each month, but after the summer winds down. All I will say is its going to be fun to watch.
Not trying to shoot down the good feelings here, but all the things people around here talk about that MUST add up to a longer contract and new/more flying cost very little to AWAC. Leather seats? A: they had to be replaced anyway and B: if Airways decided that the seats were too ratty and said 'do this or we reduce your flying because the product stinks', guess what they are going to do.

CAT II? Really very little in real dollars for the company, since we all have to go to the sim every year anyway. What's an extra hour or two for two pilots really cost? Not as much as one might think.

iPads? At $6000 per station/$12,000 per aircraft times 71 airframes, that only adds up to $852,000. AWAC earns more than that in 1 week, post operational profit at that!

The website? Contracted out to the local community college.

Don't be fooled by cost numbers that when compared to one's personal financial $'s, are enormous, but when presented against the numbers in a multi-million dollar corporation are a drop in the bucket.


ID
Reply
Old 07-31-2014 | 07:03 PM
  #673  
Inside DEENA's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by idlethrust
Yeah they want you guys to wait til the end of 2015 after all the other ones are done and about the same time your contract is up so they can save that money .Why paint 71 planes that you don't plan on keeping? Better wake up son.
That's why I said rumor. Problem is people are buying it.

If you knew who I was, you'd know I'm probably more awake than 90% of the pilot group. Trust me, we are probably on the same side of this.

ID
Reply
Old 08-01-2014 | 04:55 AM
  #674  
BlueSkiesAhead's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: On the road
Default

Originally Posted by Inside DEENA
Not trying to shoot down the good feelings here, but all the things people around here talk about that MUST add up to a longer contract and new/more flying cost very little to AWAC. Leather seats? A: they had to be replaced anyway and B: if Airways decided that the seats were too ratty and said 'do this or we reduce your flying because the product stinks', guess what they are going to do.

CAT II? Really very little in real dollars for the company, since we all have to go to the sim every year anyway. What's an extra hour or two for two pilots really cost? Not as much as one might think.

iPads? At $6000 per station/$12,000 per aircraft times 71 airframes, that only adds up to $852,000. AWAC earns more than that in 1 week, post operational profit at that!

The website? Contracted out to the local community college.

Don't be fooled by cost numbers that when compared to one's personal financial $'s, are enormous, but when presented against the numbers in a multi-million dollar corporation are a drop in the bucket.


ID
x2!

Leather seats? I would be willing to bet that directive came straight from Airways as a not so subtle suggestion to replace these things...now. It wasn't that long ago that they basically did the same thing to Mesa.

The paint situation is becoming very interesting. The majority of our airplanes look like absolute crap. If the new American doesn't care enough to want to paint these things, what does that tell you? It tells me that they don't want to spend the money on a short term solution. I guess time will tell though.
Reply
Old 08-04-2014 | 08:48 PM
  #675  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: E145
Default

Class date on the 18th... any recommendations on things to get ahead on / what to get before training

Thanks!
Reply
Old 08-04-2014 | 10:03 PM
  #676  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotandrew
Class date on the 18th... any recommendations on things to get ahead on / what to get before training

Thanks!
Just show up with a good attitude and a will to learn and you will have no issues.
Reply
Old 08-05-2014 | 05:52 AM
  #677  
patience
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Is it true, Air Wisconsin only performs static takeoffs?
Reply
Old 08-05-2014 | 07:36 AM
  #678  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Systemized
Is it true, Air Wisconsin only performs static takeoffs?

What's wrong with doing static takeoffs?
Reply
Old 08-05-2014 | 09:29 AM
  #679  
patience
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Riverside
What's wrong with doing static takeoffs?
What's wrong with a rolling t/o when you're cleared for an immediate with someone on short final and 10K of runway?
Reply
Old 08-05-2014 | 10:10 AM
  #680  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 9
Default

You get your Config warnings at 70% N1, that's why we do it. 70% N1 prior to break release is our definition of a rolling T/O.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duksrule
Hangar Talk
4
11-09-2011 06:56 AM
freightdog
Regional
64
12-03-2009 02:17 PM
Jurassic Jet
Cargo
26
11-15-2007 07:16 AM
flystraightin
Major
4
05-31-2006 06:31 AM
Sir James
Hangar Talk
0
08-04-2005 04:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices