Air Wisconsin
#721
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: (In class)
Posts: 75
Thanks, i have questions already, i got the pre class study packet and already made notecards, and a list of questions. , one that you guys may be able to answer.
On the Flows do i need to memorize the parts where there is an N/A in the FO column?
There are things listed that I am not familiar with at this time, I am assuming they will be explained in class.
On the Flows do i need to memorize the parts where there is an N/A in the FO column?
There are things listed that I am not familiar with at this time, I am assuming they will be explained in class.
#722
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 547
To answer your question...you will need to learn the CA flows too...partly because you will be of no help to your sim partner when its their turn to fly. It also helps your overall learning of the procedures and the aircraft. That being said...
Don't worry about the flows right now...you won't have to start studying that too closely until the nearly the end of systems class.
For now, focus on Indoc and learning the policies and procedures...gotta get past that first before you can concentrate on flows
Don't worry about the flows right now...you won't have to start studying that too closely until the nearly the end of systems class.
For now, focus on Indoc and learning the policies and procedures...gotta get past that first before you can concentrate on flows
#723
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: (In class)
Posts: 75
The don't send you that in the pre class study packet. Only theIAC FLOWS and Specific limitations
#728
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 66
#729
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Slightly less broke side of RJ
Posts: 132
All that was said was PSA, a management team that would run over they're own grandmother with a shiny plane to get one more shiny plane, refused additional flying.
Further evidence is that there is no way in hell that airways would use awac for additional departures if literally any other express would be able to take them.
#730
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 547
Wouldn't be an APC thread if someone didn't come running the second it is implied that PSA may not actually be able to fill every last 900 they so gratefully took it in the rear for, for the record i'm sure you will.
All that was said was PSA, a management team that would run over they're own grandmother with a shiny plane to get one more shiny plane, refused additional flying.
Further evidence is that there is no way in hell that airways would use awac for additional departures if literally any other express would be able to take them.
All that was said was PSA, a management team that would run over they're own grandmother with a shiny plane to get one more shiny plane, refused additional flying.
Further evidence is that there is no way in hell that airways would use awac for additional departures if literally any other express would be able to take them.
If all of the wholly owned could handle the flying then they wouldn't ask an FFD airline like AWAC to take more flying...so obviously full classes are great but the new airframes will only marginally increase PSA's ability to take flying since from what I understand 200s are being parked.
BTW...AWAC's classes are full too
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post