Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
SLI reality check fo VX >

SLI reality check fo VX


Notices

SLI reality check fo VX

Old 02-02-2018 | 09:02 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flywest
I give up it will be what it will be. Hope the arbitrator sees what each side brings to the table and accounts for that.
Finally. Thats the spirit!
Reply
Old 02-03-2018 | 10:02 AM
  #112  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by flywest
Ok but wasn't Vx an ALPA carrier? We all started with a DOH.... So let DOH be the gold standard.
Again, both carriers are ALPA carriers. DoH is not a factor in the ALPA Merger/Fragmentation policy. So no matter how much you want DoH to be the "gold standard" (and believe me, that's what I would want!) it won't/can't happen under the ALPA Merger/Frag policy.

Hate to burst your bubble.
Reply
Old 02-03-2018 | 10:06 AM
  #113  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
VX will not agree to DOH and the arbitrator will not award DOH, so why bother talking about it?
Especially since its NOT a part of the joint Union policy that will cover it. To continue to insist upon it is so much peeing in the wind.

It won't happen because it CAN'T happen. Dreaming about it won't make it so.
Reply
Old 02-03-2018 | 10:45 AM
  #114  
Moose's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Relative seniority. As explained to me it has nothing to do with merging the two groups. What it has to do with is each pilot group keeps “their” relative seniority. If you’re a 15-year Alaska FO, you won’t be jumped by a 10-year Alaska Captain. It keeps each seniority list as is. The merger committees are mainly negotiating percentage integration.....where the first airbus guys fall in and what ratios....and so on. The percentage integration lists would look just like what mea2000 mentioned earlier.....as an example. As for the arbitrator, they just have to “consider” ALPA merger policy and can weigh each section however they want. It becomes their show to do as they wish. I need to re-read the TPA to double-check though.
Reply
Old 02-05-2018 | 06:46 AM
  #115  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

McCaskill-Bond says that in the merger of lists with the same union the union’s merger policy shall be used. To think one- let alone three- arbitrators would decide to simply ignore the act and open their award up to litigation seems far fetched to me.

Also, rule one of the policy states that the order of both original lists is inviolate. Under no circumstances can someone on a list jump another on the same original list... Longevity (Relative seniority) as written in the policy is an entirely different subject.

Read the policy guys, it’s not that long and it’s written in fairly easy to read English.
Reply
Old 02-05-2018 | 09:22 AM
  #116  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Default

In arbitration, it will essentially come down to a percent weighting. In short they give each pilot a slot on a seniority list based 100% on DOH and another based 100% on relative position. Each pilot has two scores. For example, #1 VX Captain is #1 on RP list so that is 2700(?)ish points and on the DOH list he is about 1/2 way down so let’s pretend 1350 points.

Now the argument becomes how much to weigh each category. Let’s say it is 50% longevity and 50% RP. 2700x.5=1350 plus 1350x.5=675. Total score is 2025. Do that for every pilot on the list and then put them in order by total score.

This is how essentially the last 3 arbitrated SLI’s have been done and there is no reason to think it would be any different here.

What the arguments come down to then is how much each side should be weighed. L-UAL asked for 50% longevity weight...got 35%. In USA E/W it was 15% longevity. In USA/AA it was also 15% longevity.

Arbitrators love precedent...and this formula method is pretty easy to implement once you decide what the scores should be.

Anyway, I am horrified by some of the comments placed on here by some alleged Alaska pilots. My guess is they have to come on the internet to rant because nobody is listening to them at work.
Reply
Old 02-05-2018 | 11:14 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: a cushy one with a forward facing window
Default

Originally Posted by flywest
Ok but wasn't Vx an ALPA carrier? My understanding is VX ALPA's main goals was/is to protect jobs and seniority. WTF over. Now VX is demanding a relative seniority list. Putting a 9 year guy next to a 30 year guy. Give me a break. Can you say labor discord! We all saw the USAIR, AWA freak show. DOH avoids a windfall. We all started with a DOH. So let DOH be the gold standard.
Apples and oranges one has nothing to do with the other stop trolling, get a life
Reply
Old 02-05-2018 | 11:48 AM
  #118  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by busbusbaby
Apples and oranges one has nothing to do with the other stop trolling, get a life
His view is tainted by the fact that he has zero concept of the ALPA Merger/Frag policy.
Reply
Old 02-05-2018 | 12:30 PM
  #119  
Moose's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

While arbitrated ALPA merger policy isn’t my specialty, it appears from past cases an arbitrator can weigh provisions how they see fit. ALPA merger policy is vague. For example, longevity in arbitration has been weighed anywhere from 15-35 percent. An arbitrator could weight it 75% or 5% if they want. They can weigh the provisions however they want. They can even look outside the merger policy as long as they “considered” it. Probably not likely but possible. Arbitration sucks.

Originally Posted by Just a Lurker
McCaskill-Bond says that in the merger of lists with the same union the union’s merger policy shall be used. To think one- let alone three- arbitrators would decide to simply ignore the act and open their award up to litigation seems far fetched to me.

Also, rule one of the policy states that the order of both original lists is inviolate. Under no circumstances can someone on a list jump another on the same original list... Longevity (Relative seniority) as written in the policy is an entirely different subject.

Read the policy guys, it’s not that long and it’s written in fairly easy to read English.
Reply
Old 02-05-2018 | 04:55 PM
  #120  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
His view is tainted by the fact that he has zero concept of the ALPA Merger/Frag policy.
No, I am aware of ALPA's merger policy. I just feel DOH is the fair way of resolving the list. Just an opinion that's all. The list will be, what it will be. Just hope it's fair and the Alaska guys don't get screwed. We all have been crawling up the list for years. My opinion doesn't mean sh_t. Last time I checked, in America your still allowed to have one.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Albief15
Major
122
04-22-2016 04:26 AM
jbravo65
Career Questions
60
12-04-2012 03:07 AM
keenster
Mergers and Acquisitions
1
11-27-2008 01:51 PM
paxhauler85
Regional
177
11-02-2008 10:55 PM
BigWatchPilot
Cargo
4
07-14-2007 05:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices