Search

Notices

Alaska or Jetblue?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2019 | 07:44 PM
  #51  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 34
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I understand that other than some churn at the very bottom, nobody ever leaves... so seniority progression would depend on upgrades, which mostly depend on retirements (maybe there will be attrition over the next few years). I personally never applied to JB for that reason, and also due to the risk of being in the only west coast base, and a small one at that. But somebody from JB could elaborate on that better than I.

There is no conceivable difference between JB and AS which would cause me to do a transcon commute long-term, or even risk having to do one long-term.
Correct. JetBlue is an east coast airline and they focus on people living in JFK/BOS and where they want to go. LGB is basically a reliever base for when the east coast weather goes to crap and they need help covering transcons when guys time out due to delays.

Being a JB LGB newhire means you are willing to sacrifice not upgrading for a decade beyond when you could upgrade on the east coast. Yes, things could change, but we at JB have seen our west coast strategy decline and have lost slots in LGB overall. If you value QOL and $$$ then go to an airline that has a better west coast presence.
Reply
Old 06-16-2019 | 08:31 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,348
Likes: 332
Default

Originally Posted by mking84
New hires now holding LGB
LGB most junior CA 03/2007. You'll be a career FO in that base. To be honest looking back, so was the VX NYC base. It officially opened as a real base with 50 CAs and it then went up to about 57 but after that it was capped with 0 movement.
Reply
Old 06-17-2019 | 08:41 AM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 258
Likes: 7
From: A320 CA
Default

PBS is great when it has the right rules written in our contract! At VX it worked most of the time but some months you got crap that wasn’t explainable and if you inquired you would get some ‘mystery’ explanation on why it did that. PBS works generally really well for the top 75% of the seniority list.
However, PBS does allow you to pick “days off” that you need fairly easily.

I’ll be happy to keep Line Bidding ONLY if it removes this ridiculous requirement to pick up if you are below target time! Having Conflicts is the only reason Line Bidding has any advantage over PBS!
Those saying “you really want to give control to the company” must be living in some alternate reality because our current form of Line Bidding gives ALL control to the company...🤔
Reply
Old 06-17-2019 | 04:51 PM
  #54  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 189
Likes: 5
From: B737, CA
Default

Line bidding worked great with paid trips touching vaca, training and month to month conflicts. The other airlines lost that through bankruptcy and switched to PBS. . We lost it through kasher and haven’t.
Reply
Old 06-17-2019 | 10:13 PM
  #55  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mudhen200
Line bidding worked great with paid trips touching vaca, training and month to month conflicts. The other airlines lost that through bankruptcy and switched to PBS. . We lost it through kasher and haven’t.
The regional I was at STILL has it. What's Alaska's excuse again?
Reply
Old 06-18-2019 | 07:24 AM
  #56  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 189
Likes: 5
From: B737, CA
Default

A regional that still has paid trips touching today with line bidding???
Dude - that's worth a gold mine. You probably should have stayed at that company.
What's Alaska's excuse? You got me. We just plug along, year after year, fightin the man for a slice of cheese. I'm optimistic that things might actually get better around here before I retire. I also think that this round of negotiations will last 3 to 4 years and get ugly before that happens.
The only way you get B&B to pay attention is if the metal stops moving according to their matrix. I'm not talking about a strike, which will never happen. I'm simply saying to look at the Horizon melt down of two summers ago. That's what will get B&B's attention. Until then, all is good in their AlaskasWorld.
Reply
Old 06-19-2019 | 04:04 AM
  #57  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by noodle
The regional I was at STILL has it. What's Alaska's excuse again?
Our negotiating committee could get your entire former regional contract implemented tomorrow without breaking a sweat...would Alaska pilots want that? I doubt it.
Reply
Old 06-19-2019 | 08:25 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Default

My former regional contract was leaps and bounds better than the pile of dung that you legacy Alaska pilots call a contract that you are oh so proud of- and that was 6 years ago.
Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
Our negotiating committee could get your entire former regional contract implemented tomorrow without breaking a sweat...would Alaska pilots want that? I doubt it.
Reply
Old 06-19-2019 | 08:39 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ala5ka
My former regional contract was leaps and bounds better than the pile of dung that you legacy Alaska pilots call a contract that you are oh so proud of- and that was 6 years ago.
You obviously haven't met any legacy Alaska pilots if you think this is the case. Frankly you are behaving like a troll.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 06-19-2019 | 09:12 AM
  #60  
av8or's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 2
From: This side of the dirt.
Default

Originally Posted by Ala5ka
My former regional contract was leaps and bounds better than the pile of dung that you legacy Alaska pilots call a contract that you are oh so proud of- and that was 6 years ago.
I’ve said it before, but now, in the wake of the contract survey, I gotta call out a gross generalization.... There are THREE pilot camps at Alaska now...not two....and it’s not legacy VX, and legacy AK. So get that out of your head. It’s not true, and it doesn’t help.

1. Actively engaged forward thinking Alaska pilots who are doing the heavy lifting and leaning forward.
2. Apathetic Alaska Pilots, who are distrustful of their union (which is understandable if you know the history), BUT, are winnable if the leadership continues along a path of transparency, strength and ethics.
3. “All about me” Alaska Pilots (just like any airline) who are disengaged, and totally good with the current contract.

Based on the contract survey.... that last group is only about 9-12% of the Alaska pilot group. So, please stop with the whole “you legacy Alaska Pilots” bs rhetoric. The vast majority want change.

If/when you run into someone who doesn’t.... let it go... they’re the minority, and not worth your time.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyin1500
Alaska
64
10-23-2023 06:14 PM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Lone Palm
Regional
5
01-25-2011 09:48 AM
fireman0174
JetBlue
6
08-24-2006 05:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices