E175 sfo
02-05-2021, 11:51 AM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 144
Originally Posted by rickair7777
190's? Sure, they belong at mainline.
But the problem is if you merge existing RJ flying, the RJ pilots will want a longevity-based SLI. You cannot legally staple them unless they volunteer to be stapled.
OO you can get rid of by letting the contracts run out.
But you'd probably have to threaten to shutdown QX and transfer the assets (ala Tranny)... how's that staple sound now?
But the problem is if you merge existing RJ flying, the RJ pilots will want a longevity-based SLI. You cannot legally staple them unless they volunteer to be stapled.
OO you can get rid of by letting the contracts run out.
But you'd probably have to threaten to shutdown QX and transfer the assets (ala Tranny)... how's that staple sound now?
02-05-2021, 04:32 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,803
Originally Posted by rickair7777
Serious question: how do you get from here to there?
02-05-2021, 08:45 PM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
We had 100 seat 737-200’s, 124 seat 737-700’s, 140 seat MD 80’s, 144 seat 737-400’s, 156 seat 737-800’s and 172 seat 737-900’s (w/ mid-cabin lavs) all for the same hourly rate....Where does a plan to bring in an A220-300 that flys trans con, can do etops and seats 115 -145 pax fit into that. Even a 195-E2 can fly 110 -140 depending on config...Why should we accept less money to fly a significantly more capable airframe then we have already had. Pre chinaflue Alaska had an RFQ out to Boeing for 700MAX, Airbus for 220-300 and Embraer for E195-E2. In Alaska managements mind those 3 airframes are equal period. So they pay equal....Jetblue just created a permanent B scale by allowing the A220-300, an airframe that hauls just as many pax as a 319, flies further and costs less to operate , to be flown for less....
02-05-2021, 08:54 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 936
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
Easy, integration based on Alpa years of service. 170/190 pay 4th year AS FO rates starting and up, 170/190 FO rates 65% of AS FO rates, top at year 5. It's not going to happen though, check back in 5 years this will all be silly bickering.
In the worst year in aviation history my CA friends got 18-22K bonus, most FO friends 8-9K. This is embarrassing everyone. We work for a good company, show up do a good job and enjoy. Trust your union to fix what needs fixing.
We are about on target, let’s see what the summer brings. Relax, enjoy, and let yourself arrive!
In the worst year in aviation history my CA friends got 18-22K bonus, most FO friends 8-9K. This is embarrassing everyone. We work for a good company, show up do a good job and enjoy. Trust your union to fix what needs fixing.
We are about on target, let’s see what the summer brings. Relax, enjoy, and let yourself arrive!
02-05-2021, 09:28 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,170
Originally Posted by NewGuy01
Wait. You have friends that are FOs? Did you tell them you were salivating to lick their furlough envelopes stamp it and rejoice when when they were on the street? It's amazing how you've changed your tune so much. Attachment 6033
Like I was serious 😂. You come on here, appearing to struggle with numbers, letters, shapes, and colors. I honestly find it hard to believe you are really an Alaska pilot. The funny thing is, most my friends that are FO’s at AS have IQ’s of 125 or higher. I struggle with drivel and dude, all you write on here is drivel .
Last edited by OTZeagle1; 02-05-2021 at 10:08 PM.
02-05-2021, 09:32 PM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,170
Originally Posted by 9mikemike
We had 100 seat 737-200’s, 124 seat 737-700’s, 140 seat MD 80’s, 144 seat 737-400’s, 156 seat 737-800’s and 172 seat 737-900’s (w/ mid-cabin lavs) all for the same hourly rate....Where does a plan to bring in an A220-300 that flys trans con, can do etops and seats 115 -145 pax fit into that. Even a 195-E2 can fly 110 -140 depending on config...Why should we accept less money to fly a significantly more capable airframe then we have already had. Pre chinaflue Alaska had an RFQ out to Boeing for 700MAX, Airbus for 220-300 and Embraer for E195-E2. In Alaska managements mind those 3 airframes are equal period. So they pay equal....Jetblue just created a permanent B scale by allowing the A220-300, an airframe that hauls just as many pax as a 319, flies further and costs less to operate , to be flown for less....
02-05-2021, 09:33 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 936
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
Like I was serious 
. You come on here, appearing to struggle with numbers, letters, shapes, and colors. I honestly find it hard to believe you are really an Alaska pilot. The funny thing is, most my friends that are FO’s at AS have IQ’s of 125 or higher. I struggle with drivel.
. You come on here, appearing to struggle with numbers, letters, shapes, and colors. I honestly find it hard to believe you are really an Alaska pilot. The funny thing is, most my friends that are FO’s at AS have IQ’s of 125 or higher. I struggle with drivel.I struggle with numbers? That’s rich coming from the guy who predicted our furlough to a tenth of a percent.
You must be bummed. You were looking forward to seeing your crying FO “friends” at the Wally Mart in Gig Harbor.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
