SAN Base opening, finally…
#521
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 672
Likes: 223
#522
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,348
Likes: 332
#523
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,348
Likes: 332
I don’t see where it says what year you’d upgrade what tab is it under I see what I would be in a differnt base but not projected upgrade, I’m too junior to hold ca anyway but where do you see that I’d be interested to see
insee where it shows my EOY senior but nothing that says you’ll be able to upgrade at this year
insee where it shows my EOY senior but nothing that says you’ll be able to upgrade at this year
#524
I was messing around with the one that one guy made on the other forum an I saw the upgrade feature which is pretty cool. the non union one made by the guy has that function. But he rest of his site lacks behind unions, and UI ain’t as nice. the unions one is way better with seeing where’d you be and the commute tool is cool. But on the one the guy built there’s a upgrade when can I hold, guess 2028 I can CA 🤪
https://hawaskapilots.com/login
the unofficial site
https://hawaskapilots.com/login
the unofficial site
#525
On Reserve
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 19
The 717's are apparently long of tooth, so they probably need to go sooner rather than later.
But the 321's can hang out for quite a while, I don't think they're going to cut off their nose to spite their face. They can keep the 321's as long as they need the lift. If there was a big downturn, like another covid or big recession they'd get parked on Jan 1st. If things keep humming along they might last 15 years, or however long it takes BCA to deliver the hulls they need with the desired fuselage stretch.
But the 321's can hang out for quite a while, I don't think they're going to cut off their nose to spite their face. They can keep the 321's as long as they need the lift. If there was a big downturn, like another covid or big recession they'd get parked on Jan 1st. If things keep humming along they might last 15 years, or however long it takes BCA to deliver the hulls they need with the desired fuselage stretch.
”Get us in front of the line or we will go with Brand X” will carry some weight. If Boeing pulls it off, the 321 is gone. If they don’t, then perhaps it will stick around for a minute or two.
#526
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 186
If nothing else, the NEO fleet is a good bargaining chip down the road when Boeing inevitably $#!+$ the bed with the MAX10. Remember the thing has to be certified, but also DELIVERED in sufficient quantities to cover the gaps if the 321 is sold. The fleet runs efficient schedules these days which are quite full, and remember they are mostly owned outright or on good lease / “mortgage” terms, and yes share quite a bit of support structure with the A330.
”Get us in front of the line or we will go with Brand X” will carry some weight. If Boeing pulls it off, the 321 is gone. If they don’t, then perhaps it will stick around for a minute or two.
”Get us in front of the line or we will go with Brand X” will carry some weight. If Boeing pulls it off, the 321 is gone. If they don’t, then perhaps it will stick around for a minute or two.
#527
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,886
Likes: 684
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
I think Ben and Shane would be open to airbus philosophically. But I'm sure they get a lot peer pressure in the SEA executive ecosystem since everything there has deep boeing roots, going back generations.
Also airbus generally cost more up front, which is always a sticking point with AS.
Also airbus generally cost more up front, which is always a sticking point with AS.
#528
On Reserve
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 19
I think Ben and Shane would be open to airbus philosophically. But I'm sure they get a lot peer pressure in the SEA executive ecosystem since everything there has deep boeing roots, going back generations.
Also airbus generally cost more up front, which is always a sticking point with AS.
Also airbus generally cost more up front, which is always a sticking point with AS.
A man can dream. But as a realist yes, everyone knows we will be a small fleet of 787s for a long while, a small fleet of 330s for a less long while, and a bunch of 737s till the advent of passenger drones.
#529
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 375
Likes: 37
From: FO Obvious
True. But planes you already own cost nothing up front, yes?
A man can dream. But as a realist yes, everyone knows we will be a small fleet of 787s for a long while, a small fleet of 330s for a less long while, and a bunch of 737s till the advent of passenger drones.
A man can dream. But as a realist yes, everyone knows we will be a small fleet of 787s for a long while, a small fleet of 330s for a less long while, and a bunch of 737s till the advent of passenger drones.
#530
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 449
Likes: 39
From: Precarious
The real reason they will be staying around is that they can't be replaced by a Boeing in any realistic timeframe. If the 787 didn't have such a backlog, they would be gone fast.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



