Senority List Integration from 2007 on......

Reply Subscribe

Page 25 of 42

« First

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

11-07-2017 | 09:02 PM

#241

Just a Lurker

On Reserve

Joined: Oct 2017

Posts: 19

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Packrat

This makes the most sense to me. Throw a "No Bump, No Flush" clause in there to protect the VX Airbus Captains and you've got a winner.

There is already no bump, no flush in the TPA. That's a done deal.

11-08-2017 | 09:25 AM

#242

flywest

Line Holder

Joined: Mar 2016

Posts: 57

Likes: 0

DOH is the gold standard.

11-08-2017 | 12:55 PM

#243

mike734

New boss = Old boss

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 2,763

Likes: 1

From: Ca B737

I'm a 20+ Alaska pilot and I expect to lose a few numbers but I also expect some sort of fence to prevent those few guys from bidding in to my base. I also expect I won't be able to bid the Bus in SFO for a few years. Maybe 5 years and by then I expect those few senior VX pilots will be retired. Of course if the Buses go away quickly, that changes everything.

11-08-2017 | 01:48 PM

#244

ShyGuy

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 9,348

Likes: 332

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike734

Why a domestic narrowbody fence? Never seen that in any recent SLIs.

11-08-2017 | 02:05 PM

#245

Ray Red

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jun 2014

Posts: 679

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShyGuy

Why a domestic narrowbody fence? Never seen that in any recent SLIs.

Preserving QOL is the only reason.

11-08-2017 | 05:45 PM

#246

svergin

UCH Pilot

Joined: Oct 2014

Posts: 776

Likes: 1

From: 787

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike734

Just so you know, Delta/NW, UAL/CAL, and AA/USAir there we no base fences. United guys proposed one on the 787 but it was not allowed. There were a few widebody fences, but we had a ton of United guys flood into EWR and IAH immediately after our SLI, just like we had flooded into ORD, IAD, DEN, SFO, and LAX. It sort of defeats the purpose of integrating pilots to now let anyone bid into each other's bases.

11-08-2017 | 06:14 PM

#247

OCCP

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jan 2011

Posts: 784

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray Red

Preserving QOL is the only reason.

What QOL? The Alaska contract prevents QOL.

11-08-2017 | 06:32 PM

#248

Mea25000

OTZEagle1

Joined: Apr 2016

Posts: 409

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klsytakesit

Let me fix it for you you knucklehead......The longer this draws out the better it is for Brad and Ben. We will have no unity for sec 6 and we will vote in another”time value of money” contract.....like contract 200

I really feel sorry for you. You are by far one of angriest people on this board. Sadly it tells me your life is not be all that great. I hope you find some happiness. Life is more then money, my life is a whole lot more then my part time profession. Sorry I missed Contract 200... that must have been a real bad one. What were you driving back then, a camel?

11-08-2017 | 07:05 PM

#249

Arctichicken

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: May 2016

Posts: 288

Likes: 0

From: 737 tiller master

I'm definitely not looking forward to the SLI. I'd rather see it sooner than later. It's a public forum and all but talking about the SLI is a moot point since none of us have any control over it or a say. Be good to each other, boys 'n girls.