Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Senority List Integration from 2007 on...... >

Senority List Integration from 2007 on......

Search

Notices

Senority List Integration from 2007 on......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2017 | 06:01 AM
  #341  
OTZEagle1
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Default

No AS has plenty of HI and transcontinental flying with a second leg. Nothing would change you just would have VX pilots based in SFO on the Boeing and AS guys on the bus in SEA. At this point AS has no plans to have a 320 base in the PNW or a 73 base in SFO... this is looking out to the end of 2021. I know though, a lot of us feel there is no real plan at all at angle lake right now... so 2021 must make everyone laugh
Reply
Old 11-17-2017 | 06:33 AM
  #342  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Port Bus
Default

Originally Posted by Mea25000
No AS has plenty of HI and transcontinental flying with a second leg. Nothing would change you just would have VX pilots based in SFO on the Boeing and AS guys on the bus in SEA. At this point AS has no plans to have a 320 base in the PNW or a 73 base in SFO... this is looking out to the end of 2021. I know though, a lot of us feel there is no real plan at all at angle lake right now... so 2021 must make everyone laugh
Good to hear about the second leg deal, that seemed quite unproductive.

At least we are going to PIT next fall (2018)!! Stay positive man!
Reply
Old 11-17-2017 | 06:52 AM
  #343  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by PokerPilot007
Sorry but DOH isn’t relevant in an ALPA-ALPA merger.
It was the cornerstone of the Merger/Fragmentation Policy until the early '90s when UAL forced its replacement with "career expectations."
Reply
Old 11-17-2017 | 06:53 AM
  #344  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by Bugaboo
Alaska wont add on a 2nd leg after a east/west transcon right?
They usually tack it on BEFORE the transcon. Had a couple months of DEN-SEA-EWR at one point.
Reply
Old 11-17-2017 | 10:52 AM
  #345  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Default

Looking at the previous arbitrated mergers I estimate that the number 1vx will be slotted amongst people that were hired in the 90's. If you made me bet I would guess around '97-98ish.

Whatever leverage AS pilots had over VX over the SLI was declined to be used by the AS MEC. They decided that it was better to have a unified pilot group and fight together over wages with a quick integration than fight for a better SLI for AS pilots. For better or for worse? I dont't know. I do hope the VX guys give us a little more respect and consideration because of it.

Now that that ship has sailed AS pilots are left with no real leverage in this SLI since all of the precedents cut against AS with regards to the proper weight of longevity. 15-30% is the current range of outcomes. There are lots of good arguments for why that number should be more than 30%...As an AS pilot I am hoping for something closer to a 40 or 50...but we are nowhere near talking about anything close to a 100% weighting for longevity which is what DOH advocates are advocating.

When all this is done, there is nothing good for AS pilots that would have come from this merger. The only AS pilots that will be cheering are the retirees with their new expanded travel network to stand-by on.
Reply
Old 11-17-2017 | 11:45 AM
  #346  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AltoCumulus
Looking at the previous arbitrated mergers I estimate that the number 1vx will be slotted amongst people that were hired in the 90's. If you made me bet I would guess around '97-98ish.

Whatever leverage AS pilots had over VX over the SLI was declined to be used by the AS MEC. They decided that it was better to have a unified pilot group and fight together over wages with a quick integration than fight for a better SLI for AS pilots. For better or for worse? I dont't know. I do hope the VX guys give us a little more respect and consideration because of it.

Now that that ship has sailed AS pilots are left with no real leverage in this SLI since all of the precedents cut against AS with regards to the proper weight of longevity. 15-30% is the current range of outcomes. There are lots of good arguments for why that number should be more than 30%...As an AS pilot I am hoping for something closer to a 40 or 50...but we are nowhere near talking about anything close to a 100% weighting for longevity which is what DOH advocates are advocating.

When all this is done, there is nothing good for AS pilots that would have come from this merger. The only AS pilots that will be cheering are the retirees with their new expanded travel network to stand-by on.
Agreed, We're along for the ride now. It will be, what it will be.
Reply
Old 11-17-2017 | 12:03 PM
  #347  
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flywest
Both UAL and CAL were legacy carriers. Not a 85 year old company who acquired a start up. This is not a merger. It's an acquisition. DOH is more than fair. If Delta had bought Alaska. I would expect to be at the mercy of the DALPA.
Look at the cute little troll.
Reply
Old 11-17-2017 | 01:00 PM
  #348  
2StgTurbine's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 93
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
It was the cornerstone of the Merger/Fragmentation Policy until the early '90s when UAL forced its replacement with "career expectations."
A lot of mergers have happened since.
Reply
Old 11-17-2017 | 01:11 PM
  #349  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
A lot of mergers have happened since.
True. However, the whole reason for the change was to keep USAir pilots out of UAL widebody seats. Up until that point DoH was the gold standard. After that more than a few mergers saw one or the other pilot group getting hosed.
Reply
Old 11-17-2017 | 04:29 PM
  #350  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Always Fly With Favorite Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
True. However, the whole reason for the change was to keep USAir pilots out of UAL widebody seats. Up until that point DoH was the gold standard. After that more than a few mergers saw one or the other pilot group getting hosed.
You might want to check on the Pan Am/ National merger (1979). In the book "Skygods", Robert Gandt chronicles how arbitrator favored "career expectations" in that merger. Many Pan Am pilots felt hosed, seeing themselves hundreds of numbers lower in seniority than they expected. There were some National Captains that had later DOH than many Pan Am SO's.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyguppy
United
228
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
FlyJSH
Regional
666
05-22-2011 05:43 PM
ERJ Driver
Regional
10
01-19-2008 01:17 PM
Tech Maven
Money Talk
11
08-04-2007 08:01 PM
Gordon C
Major
7
06-05-2006 09:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices