Senority List Integration from 2007 on......
11-15-2017 | 09:38 PM
#321
On Reserve
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Not sure what the complaint is if your percentage in base and bidding power don’t change.
11-15-2017 | 11:01 PM
#322
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Right Window
11-16-2017 | 10:31 AM
#323
OTZEagle1
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
If you really think anything close to straight relative seniority is about to happen you are really setting yourself up to be unbelievably disappointed... Not even your merger committee was asking for that in its opening day of negotiations.
11-16-2017 | 11:26 AM
#324
Banned
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
11-16-2017 | 11:55 AM
#325
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
You seem to have inside info. Can you expand on that?
11-16-2017 | 12:59 PM
#327
UCH Pilot
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Relative seniority > Longevity
This was under the current ALPA policy as well.
Good luck to all of you.
11-16-2017 | 01:51 PM
#328
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Both UAL and CAL were legacy carriers. Not a 85 year old company who acquired a start up. This is not a merger. It's an acquisition. DOH is more than fair. If Delta had bought Alaska. I would expect to be at the mercy of the DALPA.
11-16-2017 | 02:15 PM
#329
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 419
Likes: 1
From: Taxi Driver
Does ALPA's merger policy break it down this way? If not, the definition of the carriers doesn't seem germane. Just because the pilots define it as an acquisition, doesn't mean it is legally defined that way, and I think that is what will matter during the sorting out of the seniority issues.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
