Senority List Integration from 2007 on......
11-05-2017 | 02:56 PM
#216
UCH Pilot
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
I though there was already a relative seniority policy with a slight adjustment for longevity? When we merged with United they weighted longevity 35% but we all ended up within 5% of our pre-existing seniority. UAL pilot right behind me on the combined list was hired 8 years ahead of me.
11-05-2017 | 10:01 PM
#217
OTZEagle1
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
I though there was already a relative seniority policy with a slight adjustment for longevity? When we merged with United they weighted longevity 35% but we all ended up within 5% of our pre-existing seniority. UAL pilot right behind me on the combined list was hired 8 years ahead of me.
11-06-2017 | 02:56 AM
#218
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Port Bus
Just a quick check.....I am showing that September 1 2018 falls on a Saturday. I am guessing that as we approach September 1 2018 that the predictions will hold tight and in fact September 1 2018 will still fall on a Saturday. We all know how that works out.
11-06-2017 | 06:42 AM
#219
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: a cushy one with a forward facing window
🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
11-06-2017 | 08:02 AM
#220
UCH Pilot
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Nope. He was 99 hire and actively flying and not furloughed. I was active 07 hire. We merged in 2010. The problem was we were roughly the same relative percentage on the active list, so our "status and category" was the same (narrowbody FO). Seniority isn't date of hire, its your relative seniority in the group. The arbitrators apparently didn't think his extra 8 years meant very much and instead our relative seniority more important. I understand where you guys are coming from, because the United pilots argued the same thing. Good luck to both sides. Wouldn't want to go through it again.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
