Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Senority List Integration from 2007 on...... >

Senority List Integration from 2007 on......

Search
Notices

Senority List Integration from 2007 on......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2016, 07:11 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Captain B-737
Posts: 290
Default

Originally Posted by svergin View Post
It's not fair. It's just Union policy. The UAL pilot one number behind me on our seniority list was hired 7+ years before me. Why? Because it ended up mostly relative seniority despite the large number of "jumbo" aircraft UAL had. I dropped about 3 percent from where I was pre-merger to the combined list. You can see Union policy is built to maintain relative percentage over longevity.

If you're banking on the "we are a superior airline and they all get raises, etc" tell that to my friends at SWA hired when I was hired at CAL who are still FOs and now telling me that 5 years have been tacked onto their upgrade because of all the AT pilots placed ahead of them on the list. No question SWA had a better contract than AT by far.

Good luck fellow ALPA pilots.
Exactly. This is why Legacy Alaska Pilots better think long and hard about ratifying any JCBA. Is a couple of bucks worth it?
EskimoJoe is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 07:15 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Captain B-737
Posts: 290
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
Percentage is B.S. You gained 7 years seniority on the guy who is now stuck behind you for the rest of his career. That's a windfall by definition.

By your reasoning the #1 VX Capt. should be listed next to the #1 AS Capt. who has 25 years seniority over him. He should be bidding over at least 200 AS pilots with 20 or more years of seniority? Sorry, I call B.S. on that.
It is B.S.! Absolute B.S. But don't be shocked when it happens.

Ratify a JCBA and Everyone gets what they want and the AS pilots get screwed.
EskimoJoe is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 09:37 AM
  #113  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
Percentage is B.S. You gained 7 years seniority on the guy who is now stuck behind you for the rest of his career. That's a windfall by definition.

By your reasoning the #1 VX Capt. should be listed next to the #1 AS Capt. who has 25 years seniority over him. He should be bidding over at least 200 AS pilots with 20 or more years of seniority? Sorry, I call B.S. on that.
After our SLI the 1st vacancy bid was for about 80 737 Captains, and virtually every one of them was a legacy United FO who wasn't able to hold Captain previously. Those were previously CAL pilot jobs that they just walked in and took. I think a VX pilot who's on the verge of being a Captain, and then gets 200-300 AS FO's placed ahead of him and bid Airbus Captain is going to be pretty upset someone else took his job. Handing a bunch of Airbus Captain seats to AS FOs would be a windfall using DOH or anything close to it.
svergin is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 10:31 AM
  #114  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 31
Default

We can speculate and debate this for the next 18 months, but in the end it will be pretty close to "relative" seniority for your seat with probably a small increase for AS pilots due to longevity. No one gets harmed with their relative seniority being honored.

- If your in the top 15% at AS your staying there... Period!
- If your in top 15% of VA, your probably staying pretty close to there on the new list... Period!

Get over DOH! It won't be used! There is NO windfall with relative seniority for either side! I'm near the top of FO's at VX, and once we upgrade the next 60 CA's later this year for the A321's coming in January, I'll be close to the number 1 FO at VX. Should I go backwards and have my upgrade extending out 2-3 more years? I didn't ask for the merger! We will all sacrifice something and have all paid our dues!

I see this as a win-win for all pilots! We are a stronger airline with an exciting future. We MUST stay unified and show management we are not going to take anything less than our peers at United, SW, Delta and American! Not one penny less! The VX pilots are unified and will stand with AS pilots and get what we ALL deserve!
PokerPilot007 is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 11:20 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Captain B-737
Posts: 290
Default

Originally Posted by PokerPilot007 View Post
We can speculate and debate this for the next 18 months, but in the end it will be pretty close to "relative" seniority for your seat with probably a small increase for AS pilots due to longevity. No one gets harmed with their relative seniority being honored.

- If your in the top 15% at AS your staying there... Period!
- If your in top 15% of VA, your probably staying pretty close to there on the new list... Period!

Get over DOH! It won't be used! There is NO windfall with relative seniority for either side! I'm near the top of FO's at VX, and once we upgrade the next 60 CA's later this year for the A321's coming in January, I'll be close to the number 1 FO at VX. Should I go backwards and have my upgrade extending out 2-3 more years? I didn't ask for the merger! We will all sacrifice something and have all paid our dues!

I see this as a win-win for all pilots! We are a stronger airline with an exciting future. We MUST stay unified and show management we are not going to take anything less than our peers at United, SW, Delta and American! Not one penny less! The VX pilots are unified and will stand with AS pilots and get what we ALL deserve!
Sorry. If this were a "Win/Win" Alaska Pilots would be happy about this merger. There isn't a single guy I've talked to that wants a thing to do with a VX merger over here.
EskimoJoe is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 11:30 AM
  #116  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by EskimoJoe View Post
Sorry. If this were a "Win/Win" Alaska Pilots would be happy about this merger. There isn't a single guy I've talked to that wants a thing to do with a VX merger over here.


Then "those" pilots are short sighted and not looking at the long term potential. Either way we can all embrace the merger or end up bitter legacy pilots.
PokerPilot007 is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 11:32 AM
  #117  
Line Holder
 
GangtaMoose's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 70
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
This is exactly why you slot the 9 year VX Captains with the 9 year AS Captains and ratio the list down from there. But I'm pretty sure you're gonna have VX guys make the argument, "My career expectation was to be the #1 Captain on my SLI, so I should go to the top of the AS list."

Sorry, but that's not even close to what ALPA defines as "career expectations." Career expectations means the expectation of holding a wide body position PERIOD. Since neither of these two airlines have wide bodies, the whole career expectations argument is a moot point. You cannot extrapolate the term to mean something YOU think it is....retirement position, seniority number, non-rev status, etc. It means one thing and one thing only: When you got hired did your airline have wide bodies on the property?
two different things here packrat. your slotting of 2007 doh guys does not meet the third tenet of ALPA merger policy which is a fair and equitable result. you are correct career expectation only means narrowbody versus wide body and that is the same for both pilot groups. this tenet of the ALPA merger policy for us is negligible because its the same narrowbody. the second tenet is longevity and as i said before the alaska group has more longevity so in the SLI process they will get more of an advantage for it. the fair and equitable tenet will prevent what you want which is slotting the most senior virgin guy with the most junior anchorage captain hired 2007. that is not a fair nor an equitable result for a capt in the top 10% to be leveled at an alaska captain at the very bottom of the list. the other important point is no one at virgin demanded anything. i know little about the virgin #1 guy but hes a humble individual and in no way making demands or saying anything. no one is spewing that virgin guys from 2007 want to be next to Alaska guys from 1980. virgin is pretty quiet here. let the process play itself out. both committees will represent their pilots. the only childish and immature posts are from your side with the likes of eskimojoe saying dont even vote on a jcba so he can force our lists to be separate. what an absolute assinine and ignorant statement to make. the last thing we need is giving management the ability to whipsaw this new airline as two separate groups. we need a unified single voice. now let's first get a kick ass jcba before we bring the pitchforks for seniority discussions. the ball is in the pilot court with oil prices low and profits very high.
GangtaMoose is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 11:35 AM
  #118  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by PokerPilot007 View Post
Then "those" pilots are short sighted and not looking at the long term potential. Either way we can all embrace the merger or end up bitter legacy pilots.
You can look at long term potential because its more than likely you're a fairly young guy salivating at the idea of jumping over the seniority of guys who have 20 years on you.

How do you think they'll feel about bidding behind someone who got such a huge seniority windfall?

Remember this: The 1st tenet of ALPA Merger/Frag policy is NO WINDFALL GAINS in seniority. Relative seniority in this merger would be an ENORMOUS windfall for VX pilots.
Packrat is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 11:52 AM
  #119  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
You can look at long term potential because its more than likely you're a fairly young guy salivating at the idea of jumping over the seniority of guys who have 20 years on you.

How do you think they'll feel about bidding behind someone who got such a huge seniority windfall?

Remember this: The 1st tenet of ALPA Merger/Frag policy is NO WINDFALL GAINS in seniority. Relative seniority in this merger would be an ENORMOUS windfall for VX pilots.
First off I'm not a young guy salivating over anything. I probably have more experience than 80% of AS pilots. I have my 20 yr ALPA pin brother. I just chose to look at the possibilities of two great airlines merging to make a better future for all of us. As far as windfall, you seem to not understand the meaning of windfall. NO AS pilot or VX pilot will lose anything with relative seniority! The vast majority of VX pilots resigned their seniority at legacy carriers to stay at VX! I'm sorry you and your buddies chose to look at your DOH and believe it makes you more valuable than a VX pilot who worked just as hard and sacrificed just as much to make this a better place for all of us. We will be one list and people will be upset with the outcome. Those are the facts! You can either welcome your fellow brothers & sister with open arms or sulk in your seat and cry that you got screwed. There isn't a single VX pilot that won't be harmed by this merger, but 90%+ of us chose to see a better future for all of us. Looking forward to sharing a beer and the cockpit with you soon.
PokerPilot007 is offline  
Old 05-14-2016, 12:07 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 384
Default

I think the point you are missing is every VX pilot would be very happy with relative seniority ( that's not hammered) and every AS pilot would be ready to burn this place to the ground. We didn't pay 2 million for that... We could have just got that without an attorney. When this is all said and done I am pretty sure we will all feel like we gave up a lot and well that will probably mean it was fair.
Mea25000 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyguppy
United
227
10-26-2012 03:23 PM
FlyJSH
Regional
666
05-22-2011 05:43 PM
ERJ Driver
Regional
10
01-19-2008 01:17 PM
Tech Maven
Money Talk
10
08-04-2007 08:01 PM
Gordon C
Major
7
06-05-2006 09:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices