Search

Notices

Allegiant Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2015 | 10:09 PM
  #2231  
New Hire
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

I voted to strike BTW but the union was saying SEND THE MESSAGE THAT WE WILL STRIKE that is the best way to avoid a strike.
Old 03-24-2015 | 10:24 PM
  #2232  
pipercub's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 42
From: MD80 CA
Default

Originally Posted by C 172
I voted to strike BTW but the union was saying SEND THE MESSAGE THAT WE WILL STRIKE that is the best way to avoid a strike.
You can send the message but they have to receive it. Clearly they have not. The possibility of us going on strike has been talked about at length for two weeks upper management is well aware of it by now. If they want to they can act and resolve this prior to a strike being called. If we do go on strike its because management failed to act.
Old 03-24-2015 | 10:48 PM
  #2233  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by C 172
Maybe it would be best to let the 9th district rule before striking. If the judge orders us back to work right away we would look like fools. We should not make decisions based on emotions. If the 9th district upholds it.... Absolutely. I'm just seeing a lot of gray. IMO
The judge has already giveth and he can taketh how ever he wants. Isn’t America beautiful. Court time in this case is our friend for once. You seem worried? Did you already bring up your concerns in the question and answer sessions? Have you called the people that matter, that make those decisions? I am not one of them. I am not not a teamster’s spokesperson or union leader, nor I’m I a union attorney. I’m just a freethinking, freedom loving, red-blooded American.

Those people probably wouldn’t comment on a public forum. But, I think you already know that. May I ask, long time lurker first time poster sir?

Originally Posted by C 172
I voted to strike BTW but the union was saying SEND THE MESSAGE THAT WE WILL STRIKE that is the best way to avoid a strike.
Old 03-25-2015 | 05:08 AM
  #2234  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by C 172
Maybe it would be best to let the 9th district rule before striking. If the judge orders us back to work right away we would look like fools. We should not make decisions based on emotions. If the 9th district upholds it.... Absolutely. I'm just seeing a lot of gray. IMO
I disagree. Until the 9th District rules, the LAS judge's ruling is the law. If you're convicted of murder but then you appeal, your butt is still in prison while the appeal is being heard. You are still a convicted murderer until the conviction is overturned. We can't sit idlely by while these "pilot profession murderers" run free to kill again.
Old 03-25-2015 | 06:12 AM
  #2235  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by C 172
I voted to strike BTW but the union was saying SEND THE MESSAGE THAT WE WILL STRIKE that is the best way to avoid a strike.
You claim to have voted to authorize a strike? Didn’t you read the fine print? Worrying about what our lawfully elected union leaders will do next; is like a nervous pax getting on an airplane, then waiting till we’re in cruise and screaming bloody murder. We’re done with that; you may as well sit back relax and enjoy the ride..
Old 03-25-2015 | 06:14 AM
  #2236  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 17
From: CA
Default

To be fair, neither was the proffer accepted - yet. Why make the parties wait a month during which no negotiations are scheduled to then call a face-to-face? It would be an interesting study to find out what the NMB historically does when granting a proffer - is this typical or do they simply come out and announce their decision?
Old 03-25-2015 | 06:22 AM
  #2237  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Default

The nmb are political bureaucrats. They are taking the path of least resistance. Historically that’s their natural tendency. What we have before us now is real and available.

Originally Posted by tailendcharlie
To be fair, neither was the proffer accepted - yet. Why make the parties wait a month during which no negotiations are scheduled to then call a face-to-face? It would be an interesting study to find out what the NMB historically does when granting a proffer - is this typical or do they simply come out and announce their decision?
Old 03-25-2015 | 06:30 AM
  #2238  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tailendcharlie
To be fair, neither was the proffer accepted - yet. Why make the parties wait a month during which no negotiations are scheduled to then call a face-to-face? It would be an interesting study to find out what the NMB historically does when granting a proffer - is this typical or do they simply come out and announce their decision?
Read through Spirit's strike thread. They had a big wait too and were called in for a meeting, with another additional wait afterwards before they were finally released. The only real difference is that they were required to keep negotiating during the period before their joint meeting with the NMB, but the NMB just cancelled all future negotiations for G4 after the proffer request was filed.

As someone already said, unity is our major strength right now. If you want to poke holes in the G4 pilot group's strategy, maybe first consider asking management how we got to this point, because they are the ones who drove us here. The pilot group cannot be expected to just stand by and let management break every rule and law with no consequences.
Old 03-25-2015 | 06:50 AM
  #2239  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Default

What did I expect? Lets see, getting my moneys worth? Are we paying dues? Someone to advocate for us, that’s what I expect.


Originally Posted by tailendcharlie
of course would you expect otherwise?
Old 03-25-2015 | 06:53 AM
  #2240  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by C 172
Maybe it would be best to let the 9th district rule before striking. If the judge orders us back to work right away we would look like fools. We should not make decisions based on emotions. If the 9th district upholds it.... Absolutely. I'm just seeing a lot of gray. IMO
And if the 9th circuit rules in our favor, should we then wait for the results of the next appeal? Supreme Court? The company has already failed twice to overturn this. They will continue to do everything possible, spending millions, to muddy the water and avoid following their own work rules. They will take every opportunity to stall and obstruct us in an effort to wear us down. We shouldn't be helping them by being overly cautious. This might be our only chance to bloody their nose and expose them for their dishonest and illegal practices and treatment of their workers. We have enough headwinds to contend with between the timid and slow government and management. I'd stick with the union's decision, they're the only ones that have our interests in mind and don't put the shareholders first.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
pipercub
Allegiant
32
11-18-2015 09:12 PM
Flameout
Military
32
03-05-2010 12:21 PM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 06:29 PM
AirWillie
Hiring News
4
11-16-2005 03:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices