Search
Notices

Allegiant Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2020, 09:51 AM
  #6281  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 242
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011 View Post
On what authority do you do a national mask mandate? Martial Law?
Nothing so drastic. It would be done much the way that the states and local governments do it now, put the mandate in place and police have the authority to issue civil infractions if necessary. The mask mandate isn’t about forcing people to wear masks, it’s more about giving support to businesses, schools or any area where people congregate if those places want to require masks. There will still be many people who don’t wear the masks because they think it’s all fake, or they think they’re bulletproof, or they think it is a violation of their civil liberties, and that’s fine, but when businesses and schools are able to bar them from entry with the backing of an executive order, then it will hopefully keep more people safe.
trvsmrtn is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 11:32 AM
  #6282  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,942
Default

Originally Posted by trvsmrtn View Post
Nothing so drastic. It would be done much the way that the states and local governments do it now, put the mandate in place and police have the authority to issue civil infractions if necessary. The mask mandate isn’t about forcing people to wear masks, it’s more about giving support to businesses, schools or any area where people congregate if those places want to require masks. There will still be many people who don’t wear the masks because they think it’s all fake, or they think they’re bulletproof, or they think it is a violation of their civil liberties, and that’s fine, but when businesses and schools are able to bar them from entry with the backing of an executive order, then it will hopefully keep more people safe.
So Congress would pass a bill that the President signs? Or Executive Orders? Or a violation of a federal regulation (like FARs)? Serious question, just trying to figure out how it works. How do you appeal?
tom11011 is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 11:47 AM
  #6283  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

New research shows a 2% difference in communities using masks vs those that don’t.
labbats is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 12:00 PM
  #6284  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 242
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011 View Post
So Congress would pass a bill that the President signs? Or Executive Orders? Or a violation of a federal regulation (like FARs)? Serious question, just trying to figure out how it works. How do you appeal?
This is all just my opinion, but I think it would be done through an executive order, but it would be more symbolic and advisory because you would still be facing the issue of states rights.

Or, they (either Congress or POTUS) could also use something like federal highway money to basically extort states into compliance, similar to how the feds have used it to force states to make 21 the legal drinking age.

As far as how you appeal, I would guess it depends on how it’s done. To be honest, if a business like Walmart wants to bar you from entry for not wearing a mask, that’s their right, and they shouldn’t need the backing of an executive order to do it.
trvsmrtn is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 12:04 PM
  #6285  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 242
Default

Originally Posted by labbats View Post
New research shows a 2% difference in communities using masks vs those that don’t.
Do you have a link to this research?
trvsmrtn is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 12:11 PM
  #6286  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

Was in Wall St Journal last week. I’ll dig around.
labbats is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 12:12 PM
  #6287  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GoFaster's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 161
Default

Originally Posted by trvsmrtn View Post
Do you have a link to this research?

https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10...aff.2020.00818

Saw the 2% quoted in an article somewhere but I think this is the study they’re referencing.

Businesses are already able to restrict access to anyone they deem fit (ie airlines). No federal mask mandate necessary for that.
GoFaster is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 12:22 PM
  #6288  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 242
Default

Originally Posted by GoFaster View Post
https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10...aff.2020.00818

Saw the 2% quoted in an article somewhere but I think this is the study they’re referencing.

Businesses are already able to restrict access to anyone they deem fit (ie airlines). No federal mask mandate necessary for that.
Like I said, it could be more of a symbolic, advisory gesture to further encourage the use of masks in all public places, or they could try to force states to require masks in all public places. This is all just speculation on my part. My point in all of it is that I think a mask mandate would be the most extreme measure you would see regarding stopping the spread from Biden.

My comment regarding businesses was about to segue to something else, but I decided to just leave it.
trvsmrtn is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 12:23 PM
  #6289  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,942
Default

Originally Posted by trvsmrtn View Post
Like I said, it could be more of a symbolic, advisory gesture to further encourage the use of masks in all public places, or they could try to force states to require masks in all public places. This is all just speculation on my part. My point in all of it is that I think a mask mandate would be the most extreme measure you would see regarding stopping the spread from Biden.

My comment regarding businesses was about to segue to something else, but I decided to just leave it.
Aren't states doing all that now?
tom11011 is offline  
Old 11-02-2020, 12:24 PM
  #6290  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 9
Default

Originally Posted by GoFaster View Post
https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10...aff.2020.00818

Saw the 2% quoted in an article somewhere but I think this is the study they’re referencing.

Businesses are already able to restrict access to anyone they deem fit (ie airlines). No federal mask mandate necessary for that.

The main model estimates suggested that because of these mandates, 230,000–450,000 cases may have been averted by May 22.”

Did you read the article or just look at the pictures? If that many cases were averted by May 22, imagine what the number is by now.
farts is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyWilliams
Foreign
116
07-30-2018 07:55 AM
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
pipercub
Allegiant
32
11-18-2015 09:12 PM
Flameout
Military
32
03-05-2010 12:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices