Search

Notices

Allegiant Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2015 | 12:38 PM
  #641  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: A320/321 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Jetpipe30
I was at RAH for almost 7 years. I have been at Allegiant for more than a year now, and if you think that even with the new contract RAH is better than coming here you're full of it. I am home waaaayyyyy more here than I was commuting at RAH. But like it has been preached before YOU HAVE TO LIVE IN BASE. This place is a lot better than doing 4 to 5 legs per day being away from home 4-5 days per week. Your buddy can have that $hit He won't make anywhere near a second year FO here at Allegiant, even with the new contract. I never got anywhere near an average of 90-95 hours average credit, and if he was picking up open time to do that he was going directly against the union's instructions in doing so. (That would be like us if we picked up mission modes.) You're buddy was getting 15-16 days off a month when they are short some 500 pilots because nobody wanted to go there because of negotiations? Ya no I don't think so... maybe in September. Last time I checked everybody was working their asses off.

Furthurmore the deadhead pay still sucks compared to the rest of the industry. I've read their contract you only get 150% if you go over something like 85 hours per month FLIGHT TIME not credit (which you rarely get). Let's skip to the chase your buddy just wanted the bonus check and that's about it.

Stop talking for the entire pilot group, it's getting old and your bull**** only goes so far. Your opinion is your opinion, just because nobody else is getting on here and going all keyboard commando like you does not give you the right to scare people away because you think you're right.

Been here over a year. Would love a contract, but if you think your buddy made a good choice by staying at RAH and he had the chance to live in base at G4 you're smoking some good stuff.
You make comparisons from RAH to a 757, A320, MD80 operator based on your commutabilty and schedule? Sounds like you just like it more because you are home more.

Allegiant is making a ton of money and is not paying you what you deserve. In fact, it is sh!t and embarrassing. You made a parallel move in my opinion which resulted in keeping the bar low at Allegiant. At least the guy who remained at RAH has some dignity.

I hope all you guys get what you deserve. I really do. Your management is screwing big time.
Reply
Old 11-13-2015 | 01:22 PM
  #642  
grnclvrs's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FirstClass
Looks like the wheels are starting to fall off at g4.

Stock's down over $50 from its high in August.
Reply
Old 11-13-2015 | 02:04 PM
  #643  
ysslah's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: 88 Gunner
Default

Originally Posted by akemps
Because it still hands down beats most regionals, from the FO perspective. Most of the hiring I've seen for the last few months has been dominated by regional FO's and people with worse jobs than Allegiant. Unfortunately, there's always someone/thing better, and always someone/thing worse.

And to think, we could end all the labor troubles overnight if we could just find a way to herd the 18,000 or so regional pilots/cats into simply not showing up for work the next day. Doubt they'd try to prosecute them (would be a decades long process).

In short, a large sampling of humans/animals will ALWAYS act in what they perceive to be their best interest, with just a few outliers willing to do what they perceive to be best for the group.

We can at least be happy that Allegiant has a group of pilots that have concluded that what's best for themselves AND the group, coincide.

Can't fight Darwin guys.
I'm talking about passengers
Reply
Old 11-13-2015 | 04:32 PM
  #644  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by ysslah
I'm talking about passengers
yes I see that now, my fault.
Reply
Old 11-13-2015 | 05:07 PM
  #645  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: 80 to 320
Default

FYI. Everyday that I asked for off I did not get. I bid senior too. SMH
Reply
Old 11-13-2015 | 07:47 PM
  #646  
freightdog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: 'Bus Driver Right Seat
Default

I'm bidding top third FOs in IWA on the 'Bus and got 98 hrs and Christmas Day off and home by 1300 on Christmas Eve. I didn't bid for any days off in particular just bid high time pure flying.
Reply
Old 11-13-2015 | 08:22 PM
  #647  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by cactusmike
I certainly hope you guys get your issues settled with management. It's sad to see the abuse by incompetent managers go unchecked in this business. Too many lives are at stake for screw ups to be running an airline. It's a testament to your professionalism that no tragedies have occurred.
.
Why do you assume Mgmt is incompetent? From my view they know exactly what they are trying to do. Run an airline on a shoestring budget with little actual concern for safety.
They do this by keeping employees under the gun. If the pilots want a union then take hostages and make things so bad that a lacking mediocre contract seems good. Oh and the crappier it is causes more attrition so that longevity is kept low.
In the end Mgmt will cash out and the suckers(employees) will be left in the lurch.
Reply
Old 11-13-2015 | 09:23 PM
  #648  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Why do you assume Mgmt is incompetent? From my view they know exactly what they are trying to do. Run an airline on a shoestring budget with little actual concern for safety.
They do this by keeping employees under the gun. If the pilots want a union then take hostages and make things so bad that a lacking mediocre contract seems good. Oh and the crappier it is causes more attrition so that longevity is kept low.
In the end Mgmt will cash out and the suckers(employees) will be left in the lurch.
Agreed. Including the Greezeball Chief Pilot.
Reply
Old 11-13-2015 | 09:48 PM
  #649  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 26
From: B777/CA retired
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Why do you assume Mgmt is incompetent? From my view they know exactly what they are trying to do. Run an airline on a shoestring budget with little actual concern for safety.
They do this by keeping employees under the gun. If the pilots want a union then take hostages and make things so bad that a lacking mediocre contract seems good. Oh and the crappier it is causes more attrition so that longevity is kept low.
In the end Mgmt will cash out and the suckers(employees) will be left in the lurch.
You are right, in management school that would be considered success. I'm thinking in terms of real world, let's move people safely and reliably as benchmarks of success. And take care of employees. But I know that's fantasy.
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 01:55 AM
  #650  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: Off to the left!
Default

All they care about is making a buck, and keeping all the costs as low as possible. Maintenance, staffing, and scheduling software are important as long as it costs next to nothing.

I mean, even MG has said he's all for safety, but he's not going crazy with it. After all, he doesn't want it to be just another f'n airline....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyWilliams
Foreign
116
07-30-2018 07:55 AM
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
pipercub
Allegiant
32
11-18-2015 09:12 PM
Flameout
Military
32
03-05-2010 12:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices