Search

Notices

777 & 787

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2023 | 05:00 PM
  #91  
New Hire
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

What is DOH
ORD 787 most Junior FO
ORD 787 Line holder FO
Reply
Old 01-10-2023 | 11:15 PM
  #92  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 585
Likes: 48
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by livingAAdream
What is DOH
ORD 787 most Junior FO
ORD 787 Line holder FO
ORD 787 junior FO line holder - 21 years
Most senior 787 ORD FO - 36 years.
ORD 787 most junior FO - 7 years.
It looks like almost all ORD 787 flying goes through MIA or PHX.
Reply
Old 01-11-2023 | 09:12 AM
  #93  
Al Czervik's Avatar
You scratched my anchor
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by AAL24
ORD 787 junior FO line holder - 21 years
Most senior 787 ORD FO - 36 years.
ORD 787 most junior FO - 7 years.
It looks like almost all ORD 787 flying goes through MIA or PHX.
most junior line holder is 9 years
Reply
Old 01-11-2023 | 09:52 AM
  #94  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 585
Likes: 48
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
most junior line holder is 9 years

The most junior line holder with trips on their schedule for the month of January is seniority #8269 with a hire date of 2001.

Last edited by AAL24; 01-11-2023 at 10:24 AM.
Reply
Old 01-11-2023 | 10:16 AM
  #95  
Al Czervik's Avatar
You scratched my anchor
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by AAL24
That's misleading info. The most junior line holder with trips on their schedule for the month of January is seniority #8269 with a hire date of 2001. The pilots you are referencing are coded as "line holders" but their months are entirely blocked out for training or some type of leave. The most junior pilot at the company, with a retirement date of 2062, would be a Line Holder according to your logic. 3XP codes him as a "LH" even though he is on leave for the entire month.
TWA guy. There are 9 year dudes senior to that guy.
Reply
Old 01-11-2023 | 10:40 AM
  #96  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 585
Likes: 48
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
TWA guy. There are 9 year dudes senior to that guy.
SLI stuff. I'm not sure what's a better metric. For a significant portion of the seniority list (and the pilot in question) it's 20+ years to hold a WB line. For the third listers it was much faster. When someone asks how long to hold WB CA do we reference the AWA guys who had a much quicker path to WB CA or the LAA pilots who are years behind? It's hard to get a good reference with a seniority list that's a product of multiple mergers. More importantly today's numbers will be meaningless for new hires. The landscape will be much different in 10 years.

An interesting data point for potential new hires interested in ORD widebody flying is that it looks like we are down to one international destination out of Chicago (LHR). Every other trip flies through another base (PHX, MIA). It looks like AA has almost entirely ceded ORD International to UAL.
Reply
Old 01-11-2023 | 10:43 AM
  #97  
Al Czervik's Avatar
You scratched my anchor
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by AAL24
SLI stuff. I'm not sure what's a better metric. For a significant portion of the seniority list (and the pilot in question) it's 20+ years to hold a WB line. For the third listers it was much faster. When someone asks how long to hold WB CA do we reference the AWA guys who had a much quicker path to WB CA or the LAA pilots who are years behind? It's hard to get a good reference with a seniority list that's a product of multiple mergers. More importantly today's numbers will be meaningless for new hires. The landscape will be much different in 10 years.
That’s why I referenced it. It’s much more realistic for the future pilots. “New hires” directly follow 3rd listers.
Reply
Old 01-11-2023 | 10:49 AM
  #98  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 585
Likes: 48
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
That’s why I referenced it. It’s much more realistic for the future pilots. “New hires” directly follow 3rd listers.
I think the big question is whether or not we will still have a ORD 787 base in 9 years? Have they announced any new routes for the summer or fall? It looks like they are down to just one destination (LHR).
Reply
Old 01-11-2023 | 10:53 AM
  #99  
Al Czervik's Avatar
You scratched my anchor
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by AAL24
I think the big question is whether or not we will still have a ORD 787 base in 9 years? Have they announced any new routes for the summer or fall? It looks like they are down to just one destination (LHR).
ORD drops to just LHR in the winter. CDG is Year round except the second half of Jan and feb. Summer flying comes back in March/April. DUB, LHR(4to5 Daily), CDG, BCN, FCO, ATH. Rumor is KRK this summer as well.
Reply
Old 01-11-2023 | 12:25 PM
  #100  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 585
Likes: 48
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
ORD drops to just LHR in the winter. CDG is Year round except the second half of Jan and feb. Summer flying comes back in March/April. DUB, LHR(4to5 Daily), CDG, BCN, FCO, ATH. Rumor is KRK this summer as well.
I wonder if that’s a viable long term business plan? Does UAL drop to one destination during Jan and Feb? Do they have just 6 destinations during peak season? How do we attract big corporate accounts when we disappear during shoulder and low seasons and just cherry pick traffic during peak? I’m sure Znotins has it under control but we sure seem to be tracking a different course than DAL and UAL.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shiznit
Safety
24
01-23-2013 06:43 PM
HankHill
Cargo
58
04-24-2010 08:13 AM
vagabond
Foreign
1
04-12-2009 05:29 PM
Ottopilot
Major
9
03-05-2009 11:50 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-04-2005 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices