Search

Notices

777 & 787

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2023 | 01:29 PM
  #81  
Arado 234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
American Airlines used to do wide body international, and they were damn good at it. Most of us who have been in this industry a while remember AA DC-10, A300, and 767 Luxury Liners flying all over the world.

But then they were taken over by US Air. US Air was a hodgepodge domestic/regional airline conglomeration that was scared of wide body international and never more than dipped their toes in it. And that brought us the "American" of today, which is AA in name only, like a little boy wearing his dad's old shoes.
I keep forgetting it was USAir that ordered all them Fokkers and Maddogs for AA. They might have been bigger but nothing more than a "Meh" product. Always been that wAAy.
Remember when those Maddog engines kept blowing up, due to really crAApy maintenance? Blame USAir for that, too?
At old superior AA, employees even had to pay to non-rev on their own metal. Ah, the good ol' days...
What did the USair/AWA get out the superior LAA thinking? Weight restrictions for the Jumpseat. 'Cause it's always been that wAAy, and quite frankly, you should be livin' in base, son!

Last edited by Arado 234; 01-04-2023 at 01:42 PM.
Reply
Old 01-04-2023 | 01:31 PM
  #82  
Arado 234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
The USAir 330s were pretty nice too, the 5 or so places they flew them.
Surprisingly, those were much more reliable than the superior 76s. Remember famous flight 50/50* out of ORD?

*nicknamed 5050, because it was a 50/50 chance it would cancel.
Reply
Old 01-04-2023 | 02:27 PM
  #83  
thrust's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 76
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234
Have you taken a European or Asian carrier? We cannot even compare. It's embarrassing.
I’ve flown biz on British Airways and Lufthansa. BA’s biz class was 2-4-2 seating- in every seat you’re staring at your neighbor, sometimes three. It was awkward and claustrophobic. On Lufthansa, it was 2-2-2 I think- forced to step over someone if you had a window. Even United had a garbage 2-4-2 business class product until relatively recently, while AA and DAL had long gone to 1-2-1.

I flew China Eastern in biz- nice 1-2-1 seating, but the entire biz cabin smelled like cigarette smoke. You could literally see smoke coming out of the cockpit as the pilots took down carton after carton over 12+ hours.
Reply
Old 01-04-2023 | 06:35 PM
  #84  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 346
Likes: 10
From: NYC Based 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234
Have you taken a European or Asian carrier? We cannot even compare. It's embarrassing.
Agreed. Those carriers are embarrassing. Would rather be on a US carrier than on LH, BA, AF, LO, JL…etc etc.
Reply
Old 01-05-2023 | 04:45 AM
  #85  
Arado 234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Default

Sure thing Holmes. Lol.

I even non-rev on other carriers if I have the choice, e.g. AA or B6. The only "premium" product we offer is the 321T. Other than that ... 🤢
Reply
Old 01-06-2023 | 08:04 AM
  #86  
Cosgr's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 134
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234
Sure thing Holmes. Lol.

I even non-rev on other carriers if I have the choice, e.g. AA or B6. The only "premium" product we offer is the 321T. Other than that ... 🤢
It does not sound like you non-rev on us at all if you think the 321T is the only premium product we have.
Reply
Old 01-06-2023 | 12:00 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,235
Likes: 81
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234
Surprisingly, those were much more reliable than the superior 76s. Remember famous flight 50/50* out of ORD?

*nicknamed 5050, because it was a 50/50 chance it would cancel.
Sounds like poor maintenance or parts.....I fly the 767 and can only recall twice in 6 yrs where our flight didn't go because of plane mx.
Reply
Old 01-10-2023 | 03:28 PM
  #88  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 632
Likes: 20
Default

It looks like AA took/is taking 12 787 deliveries from 2022/23. Are there any rumors about more vacancies for these planes, where they'll be based at? I'd imagine a fair number of 787 pilots will be retiring in the next 5 years as well.
Reply
Old 01-10-2023 | 04:36 PM
  #89  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 585
Likes: 48
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by 9easy
It looks like AA took/is taking 12 787 deliveries from 2022/23. Are there any rumors about more vacancies for these planes, where they'll be based at? I'd imagine a fair number of 787 pilots will be retiring in the next 5 years as well.
They just ran a vacancy bid for next June and the 787 awards were minimal. Quite a few 777 spots though. I’m not sure what’s going on with 787 staffing. People have been saying we were “fat” on pilots for a couple years now but we’ve had a steady stream of retirements without any corresponding big vacancy awards. It’s pretty stagnant. Maybe the increased 787 domestic flying is reducing the required number of pilots on the fleet. Less augmented trips. Or the training department is still FUBAR’d. Who knows…
Reply
Old 01-10-2023 | 04:50 PM
  #90  
New Hire
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

What is DOH for
ORD 787 most Junior FO
ORD 787 Line holder FO ?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shiznit
Safety
24
01-23-2013 06:43 PM
HankHill
Cargo
58
04-24-2010 08:13 AM
vagabond
Foreign
1
04-12-2009 05:29 PM
Ottopilot
Major
9
03-05-2009 11:50 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-04-2005 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices