Search

Notices

777 & 787

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2022 | 03:35 PM
  #71  
Swakid8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
I think UA is a house of cards. Kirby is obsessed with sticking it to his rivals and former bosses at AA and he's in a race with them to outcompete on the "bigger is better" scale. Their overhead is already massive and I don't think they have the premium revenue to support it in the long run. Nevertheless they're over leveraging badly in this expansion and UAL has a long history of spending like drunken sailors until the day the music stops. The next time that place collapses it's gonna be ugly. I wouldn't want to be in the bottom 50% over there.
I wouldn’t be quick to say that. Yes SK has a Vendetta against AA and DL. However, United is behind both AA and DL domestically when it comes to mainline capacity and have some some hubs that are under developed. There’s definitely room for for growth. While we have a ton of airplanes on order, we also have a ton of airplanes that are getting up in age in the mainline fleet. I think United will see some small growth domestically as RJs are phased out and hubs like DEN, IAH, IAD are developed to their true potential.

When it comes to international, United has some great hubs that captures international premium demand. ORD, EWR, IAH all solid hubs for international premium demand. SFO and LAX is down due to Asian demand being down. Our WB order is targeted as a 756 and 777 PW replacement, so only growth of gauge for the time being.
Reply
Old 12-22-2022 | 04:08 PM
  #72  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
From: Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
I’m not doom and gloom for AA. Anything that negatively impacts AA will likely impact the rest of the industry too. And I think your airline is going to transform itself more than others in the coming years due to your management and due to poor representation from APA.
Wow, didn’t realized I worked there.
Reply
Old 12-22-2022 | 06:07 PM
  #73  
Arado 234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
American Airlines used to do wide body international, and they were damn good at it. Most of us who have been in this industry a while remember AA DC-10, A300, and 767 Luxury Liners flying all over the world.

But then they were taken over by US Air. US Air was a hodgepodge domestic/regional airline conglomeration that was scared of wide body international and never more than dipped their toes in it. And that brought us the "American" of today, which is AA in name only, like a little boy wearing his dad's old shoes.
And yet the LAA pilots gave Doug a standing ovation when he addressed them about the merger. Life must have been AAwesome over there. The land of milk & honey. Superior. Please repeat it 47 times.
Reply
Old 12-23-2022 | 01:27 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 66
From: MD-11 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234
And yet the LAA pilots gave Doug a standing ovation when he addressed them about the merger. Life must have been AAwesome over there. The land of milk & honey. Superior. Please repeat it 47 times.
Please get it right.

They were called to and stood at attention and saluted.
Reply
Old 01-01-2023 | 09:49 PM
  #75  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
American Airlines used to do wide body international, and they were damn good at it. Most of us who have been in this industry a while remember AA DC-10, A300, and 767 Luxury Liners flying all over the world.
I just rode American internationally in a 787, and they seemed pretty good at it.

Nice business class, too.
Reply
Old 01-03-2023 | 06:46 AM
  #76  
Margaritaville's Avatar
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke
I just rode American internationally in a 787, and they seemed pretty good at it.

Nice business class, too.
The USAir 330s were pretty nice too, the 5 or so places they flew them.
Reply
Old 01-03-2023 | 02:48 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 102
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
The USAir 330s were pretty nice too, the 5 or so places they flew them.
wow… 5 destinations for 22 planes?! Whodathunkit….?!?!
Reply
Old 01-04-2023 | 06:10 AM
  #78  
Margaritaville's Avatar
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
wow… 5 destinations for 22 planes?! Whodathunkit….?!?!
Look up hyperbole and stop taking chat boards seriously. Lol.
Reply
Old 01-04-2023 | 12:13 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 102
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Look up hyperbole and stop taking chat boards seriously. Lol.
that was beyond hyperbole…
Reply
Old 01-04-2023 | 01:24 PM
  #80  
Arado 234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke
I just rode American internationally in a 787, and they seemed pretty good at it.

Nice business class, too.
Have you taken a European or Asian carrier? We cannot even compare. It's embarrassing.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shiznit
Safety
24
01-23-2013 06:43 PM
HankHill
Cargo
58
04-24-2010 08:13 AM
vagabond
Foreign
1
04-12-2009 05:29 PM
Ottopilot
Major
9
03-05-2009 11:50 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-04-2005 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices