![]() |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3171136)
You know perfectly well it wasn't just the wrong heading that got them fired. The CA got his job back very soon after.
And by shortly after you mean more or less than a year? And what about the FO. It’s Envoy. Once again, thread drift, back on track. |
Don’t keep us in suspense! What happened in ORD? Never heard about it on AvHerald or anywhere else.
If anything else it could be a good learning experience for all of us. |
Sounds like there's some weird quirk on that plane about shutting down #2 before the apu is fully started.... can knock out nw steering and braking.
But anyway, talk about that in the envoy thread. I'm sorry I brought the H-youth into this, just wanted an easy clap back at coochie |
.......
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3170875)
Why would anything happen to the pilots?
They fired some CA. off of the ATR for trying to repair an overhead bin, on his next turn into the hub. I think it wouldn't stay shut or some dam thing and he wound up breaking it trying to fix it. I guess we had faster cockroaches back there then. |
Originally Posted by Boxhound
(Post 3171280)
Because I worked at that sh!thole of a place for many years back in the bad old days.
|
Did you guys see the JetBlue AIP?
APA out here providing expense free 0 line reserves for the company while they're negotiating 2% raises and no furloughs till May 2022 https://static1.squarespace.com/stat.../?format=1500w |
Originally Posted by sanicom3205
(Post 3171842)
Did you guys see the JetBlue AIP?
APA out here providing expense free 0 line reserves for the company while they're negotiating 2% raises and no furloughs till May 2022 https://static1.squarespace.com/stat.../?format=1500w |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3171884)
I spoke with a JB dude. His take was it helps them out in the short term but it hands the keys to all the WB flying to AA permanently.
|
Originally Posted by Ted Striker
(Post 3171889)
What did this guy say? Honest question. Since, full language hasnt been negotiated yet or any details released. Curious what his take was.
From what I understand, the scope was (permanently) loosened/changed in the current codeshare they accepted to mitigate furloughs until May. He assumed the changes in the new AIP would be similar. |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3171905)
From what I understand, the scope was (permanently) loosened/changed in the current codeshare they accepted to mitigate furloughs until May. He assumed the changes in the new AIP would be similar.
|
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3171884)
I spoke with a JB dude. His take was it helps them out in the short term but it hands the keys to all the WB flying to AA permanently.
My point is that other shops are getting work done and our union is not |
Originally Posted by sanicom3205
(Post 3171925)
Which is a win for the pilots if you believe they never had plans for heavy flying anyway.
My point is that other shops are getting work done and our union is not |
Originally Posted by FlyyGuyy
(Post 3171938)
It's inverted and pulling for the dirt
filler |
Originally Posted by sanicom3205
(Post 3171939)
Elaborate
filler |
Originally Posted by sanicom3205
(Post 3171939)
Elaborate
filler |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3171954)
I believe he’s talking about APA.
|
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3171905)
From what I understand, the scope was (permanently) loosened/changed in the current codeshare they accepted to mitigate furloughs until May. He assumed the changes in the new AIP would be similar.
|
Originally Posted by rvr1800
(Post 3172051)
Nothing was permanent. It was only approved until May 1 in the current LOA.
The code share with AA expired in May? |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3172054)
The code share with AA expired in May?
|
Originally Posted by Steelers
(Post 3172061)
LOA 12 which prevented furlough through May granted B6 a one time scope relief so they sign the AA codeshare. Jetblue's cba had a stipulation where Jetblue couldn't add or renew codeshares if block hours are less then x amount.
So permanent assuming you don’t drop block. |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3172063)
So permanent assuming you don’t drop block.
|
Originally Posted by Steelers
(Post 3172067)
No permanent changes to cba. Jetblue can't freely codeshare now.
The codeshare with AA continues past May 1 if your block hours don’t drop. Right? |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3172069)
The codeshare with AA continues past May 1 if your block hours don’t drop. Right?
|
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3172069)
The codeshare with AA continues past May 1 if your block hours don’t drop. Right?
|
Originally Posted by Steelers
(Post 3172076)
correct It will continue regardless of block hours since relief was given.
Thanks Filler |
When will we start winning? How many decades has it been? Serious question.
How many chances do we plan on giving? Every day lost is costing us all. Or is our mindset to only keep signing industry trailing long and short term agreements? |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3172069)
The codeshare with AA continues past May 1 if your block hours don’t drop. Right?
|
Originally Posted by SaintNick
(Post 3172094)
the butthurt is still strong in this one...
|
APA has three months now to save pilot jobs.
No furloughs |
Originally Posted by Gooselives
(Post 3173161)
APA has three months now to save pilot jobs.
No furloughs |
Originally Posted by EagleVol
(Post 3173182)
I think APA has made it pretty clear, they don’t really have any interest in mitigating furloughs.
|
Originally Posted by ERAUAV8TR
(Post 3173184)
thats sick
|
Originally Posted by EagleVol
(Post 3173182)
I think APA has made it pretty clear, they don’t really have any interest in mitigating furloughs.
It's an absolute disgrace that a guy can do 10-11 years at AAG/Envoy, transfer to AAG/AA and then find himself furloughed APA needs to think longer term. This will happen again someday. Fix it now. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3175334)
Prior to the SLI they had been working on a one list plan. If that had been completed back in 2013, nobody currently at AA would have been furloughed. Now, it would take fences and be more complicated, but with the fence set to vanish once the last new hire after DOS moves up from RJ's the fences would go away and you'd have one list, and never face furlough after having 5-10 years already working for AAG.
It's an absolute disgrace that a guy can do 10-11 years at AAG/Envoy, transfer to AAG/AA and then find himself furloughed APA needs to think longer term. This will happen again someday. Fix it now. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3175334)
Prior to the SLI they had been working on a one list plan. If that had been completed back in 2013, nobody currently at AA would have been furloughed. Now, it would take fences and be more complicated, but with the fence set to vanish once the last new hire after DOS moves up from RJ's the fences would go away and you'd have one list, and never face furlough after having 5-10 years already working for AAG.
It's an absolute disgrace that a guy can do 10-11 years at AAG/Envoy, transfer to AAG/AA and then find himself furloughed APA needs to think longer term. This will happen again someday. Fix it now. |
Originally Posted by watch
(Post 3177004)
how would this work with someone who was hired off the street at AA this year? Would a Jan 2020 hired off the street be furloughed, but the 10 year Envoy flow in that same class would flow back?
|
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3175334)
Prior to the SLI they had been working on a one list plan. If that had been completed back in 2013, nobody currently at AA would have been furloughed. Now, it would take fences and be more complicated, but with the fence set to vanish once the last new hire after DOS moves up from RJ's the fences would go away and you'd have one list, and never face furlough after having 5-10 years already working for AAG.
It's an absolute disgrace that a guy can do 10-11 years at AAG/Envoy, transfer to AAG/AA and then find himself furloughed APA needs to think longer term. This will happen again someday. Fix it now. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3175334)
Prior to the SLI they had been working on a one list plan. If that had been completed back in 2013, nobody currently at AA would have been furloughed. Now, it would take fences and be more complicated, but with the fence set to vanish once the last new hire after DOS moves up from RJ's the fences would go away and you'd have one list, and never face furlough after having 5-10 years already working for AAG.
It's an absolute disgrace that a guy can do 10-11 years at AAG/Envoy, transfer to AAG/AA and then find himself furloughed APA needs to think longer term. This will happen again someday. Fix it now. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 3175334)
...you'd have one list...
It's an absolute disgrace that a guy can do 10-11 years at AAG/Envoy, transfer to AAG/AA and then find himself furloughed And how would this one list work? As an example, could the 20 year Envoy/AE pilot suddenly decide to become a 787 captain at American and outbid everyone with their seniority on that one list? Should that 10-11 year Envoy pilot start at AA at 10-11 year pay? Or would it only apply to furloughs when the one year mainline AA pilot gets furloughed before the brand new, new hire? This is one of the issues with flows and parent companies, this sense of entitlement that an Envoy pilot should have special privileges over others because they flew for a regional before moving up to mainline. Seems to be a lot of entitlement attitude from the Envoy group (not all of them). Furloughs are a reality with airlines, I'm furloughed right now. Seems you want to take all the reward of moving up to mainline without taking any of the risk. Can't have it both ways. |
Originally Posted by sanicom3205
(Post 3177113)
Why is it than envoy pilots are American pilots but not the other two WO? More strenuous hiring standards I suppose?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:17 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands