Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Pilot shortage: AA cancelled 100's of flights >

Pilot shortage: AA cancelled 100's of flights

Search

Notices

Pilot shortage: AA cancelled 100's of flights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2021 | 03:41 AM
  #121  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 592
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
N4TL? What’s that for those of us not proficient in DECS?
N4TL is an option when you select HISEQ to see what trips TTOT will let you trade your current trips with...Trade-able Legal...the other option is N4T which will show you all the trips you could trade your current trip with but does not filter for legality
Reply
Old 06-25-2021 | 03:46 AM
  #122  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 592
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
I have five green trips…but they are all one day trips…crappy one day trips but they pay 6:30 or better. First green trips I’ve seen in a long time. First time flying 1 days too. YMMV
That's not uncommon at all...Almost every month in most categories 1day trips will turn Green at some point...The problem the last few months is all the open time out there is designated as Red while most peoples current trips are Redder, thus not allowing any trades with open time...and we are not talking trading a 5day to a 2day straight up here either, it won't even let you trade a 3day for another 3day on a different set of days...its pretty bad...I have had some success, thanks LS, but other than that crickets.
Reply
Old 06-25-2021 | 05:51 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Kebert Xela
I didn’t nor do I claim to have any info or insight then or now. However, did United with the largest exposure to international and wide body fleet furlough? Delta with their JV’s going bankrupt and losing big on them furlough?

Did they threaten furloughs, absolutely. Did they have management saying that furloughs was the absolute wrong decision and they wouldn’t do it so they could take market share and be prepared for a recovery? Not to my knowledge. If they did, well they didn’t furlough and get caught with their pants down much like AA.

If AA sends a message they better live by it. Right now WE’RE dying by it and expected to do more because of their ineptness. Asking work groups to volunteer to work for free because they screwed up, give me a break. They don’t care about us and have proven they can’t handle running a company. We made less money than competitors during the good times! It’s just embarrassing now.
Vasu is a revenue guy, it stands to reason more pilots and planes always generate more revenue than fewer pilot and planes.

Vasu’s department isn’t obligated to concern themselves with overhead.

Interchanging “the company” with revenue mgmt department oversimplifies the difference between revenue and profit.

Saying they shouldn’t have furloughed is either just a desire, Monday morning quarter back, or saying they should have known exactly when this thing would be over.

Right now its good info, they have booked more work than what the pilot group can handle, maybe even with the furloughs back.
Reply
Old 06-25-2021 | 06:11 AM
  #124  
brockenspectre's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: 25A
Default

Originally Posted by flyinawa
Oooooh, the old “if you don’t know, I’m not gonna explain it to you” reply. Well played, sir. WELL played.

It was an honest question. You wanna shoot arrows? At least provide some explanation.
I did provide an explanation, down to the most simple form. My comment obviously rubbed you the wrong way, so you are obviously cognizant that what I said holds water.
Reply
Old 06-25-2021 | 06:13 AM
  #125  
sanicom3205's Avatar
Eating A Gruben
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Happyflyer
Vasu is a revenue guy, it stands to reason more pilots and planes always generate more revenue than fewer pilot and planes.

Vasu’s department isn’t obligated to concern themselves with overhead.

Interchanging “the company” with revenue mgmt department oversimplifies the difference between revenue and profit.

Saying they shouldn’t have furloughed is either just a desire, Monday morning quarter back, or saying they should have known exactly when this thing would be over.

Right now its good info, they have booked more work than what the pilot group can handle, maybe even with the furloughs back.
Even if you give the company a pass just because his title is chief revenue officer, why did we generate less revenue despite flying more than DAL and UAL prior to the pandemic? I bet the same is true for after the pandemic. What’s the excuse there?

Do you think that Vasu and his team operate in a vacuum? More pilots and more planes means more revenue, so you think they will always argue to grow the company even when it doesn’t make sense to do so? Extremely myopic viewpoints are acceptable just because of what someone’s job title is?

Why did DAL and UAL not furlough, while we did? Almost seems like they were smart enough to see the potential in a recovery to me. You can defend it all until the cows come home, doesn’t change the fact that we took a different course than everyone else and are paying the price for it. Enraging passengers is not good for business, and neither is making the news for cancelling flights due to staffing after begging for government assistance to keep staff on property. How is that something anyone can argue about?

Last edited by sanicom3205; 06-25-2021 at 06:29 AM.
Reply
Old 06-25-2021 | 06:36 AM
  #126  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: HUD cripple.
Default

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
N4TL blank. As it was for every trip in June as well. Place is a joke.
Thats pretty much every month in my bid status. Anyone want some sweet all night turns to Latin America? I can hook you up.
Reply
Old 06-25-2021 | 07:45 AM
  #127  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 20
Default

Originally Posted by sanicom3205
Even if you give the company a pass just because his title is chief revenue officer, why did we generate less revenue despite flying more than DAL and UAL prior to the pandemic? I bet the same is true for after the pandemic. What’s the excuse there?

Do you think that Vasu and his team operate in a vacuum? More pilots and more planes means more revenue, so you think they will always argue to grow the company even when it doesn’t make sense to do so? Extremely myopic viewpoints are acceptable just because of what someone’s job title is?

Why did DAL and UAL not furlough, while we did? Almost seems like they were smart enough to see the potential in a recovery to me. You can defend it all until the cows come home, doesn’t change the fact that we took a different course than everyone else and are paying the price for it. Enraging passengers is not good for business, and neither is making the news for cancelling flights due to staffing after begging for government assistance to keep staff on property. How is that something anyone can argue about?
Along those lines, after my flight late last night (about 10:30 PM), I was walking through the terminal at LAX and saw a massive line of passengers waiting at the service center for two agents to rebook them. Probably 150 people in that line. The people near the back of that line were going to be there for probably well over an hour.
Reply
Old 06-26-2021 | 03:49 PM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sanicom3205
Even if you give the company a pass just because his title is chief revenue officer, why did we generate less revenue despite flying more than DAL and UAL prior to the pandemic? I bet the same is true for after the pandemic. What’s the excuse there?

Do you think that Vasu and his team operate in a vacuum? More pilots and more planes means more revenue, so you think they will always argue to grow the company even when it doesn’t make sense to do so? Extremely myopic viewpoints are acceptable just because of what someone’s job title is?

Why did DAL and UAL not furlough, while we did? Almost seems like they were smart enough to see the potential in a recovery to me. You can defend it all until the cows come home, doesn’t change the fact that we took a different course than everyone else and are paying the price for it. Enraging passengers is not good for business, and neither is making the news for cancelling flights due to staffing after begging for government assistance to keep staff on property. How is that something anyone can argue about?
2019 revenue
Delta was 47B
AA was 45B
United was 43B

My take was the Max was down, the mechanics were doing their work slow down, and they were retiring the MD-80s, and Delta has JV revenue that is larger than AA’s.

Delta did furlough, I believe over 1,000 received no award on a displacement notice; their union negotiated 35 hours at 717 FO pay. The cares act bumped them up to full time pay. They were not qualified on any Delta equipment.

Vasu doesn’t operate in a vacuum, CASM includes the relevant cost for him to use. His department doesn’t produce a ROI for furloughs for the various labor groups. If anything the APA is responsible for ensuring that furloughs are costly tilting any ROI spreadsheet in their favor.

IF United didn’t furlough its because their contract, ratio of domestic/international titled the ROI of a furlough in the pilots favor. Has little bearing on Kirby's foresight vs Parker on when this would end.

AA parked 4 fleet types, and claims they knocked 1B in overhead off of 2019 volume.

I don’t have any numbers yet but I believe the June cancels are due to AA scheduling more block hours than Delta or United.

I highly doubt Delta or United could park 4 fleets and only suffer 3% capacity for 30-60 days.

I think both company’s are internally upset they didn’t schedule more blocks hours for June, and have already started “missing out”.

Last edited by Happyflyer; 06-26-2021 at 04:03 PM.
Reply
Old 06-26-2021 | 03:58 PM
  #129  
sanicom3205's Avatar
Eating A Gruben
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Happyflyer
2019 revenue
Delta was 47B
AA was 45B
United was 43B

My take was the Max was down, the mechanics were doing their work slow down, and they were retiring the MD-80s, and Delta has JV revenue that is larger than AA’s.

Delta did furlough, I believe over 1,000 received no award on a displacement notice; their union negotiated 35 hours at 717 FO pay. The cares act bumped them up to full time pay. They were not qualified on any Delta equipment.

Vasu doesn’t operate in a vacuum, CASM includes the relevant cost for him to use. His department doesn’t produce a ROI for furloughs for the various labor groups. If anything the APA is responsible for ensuring that furloughs are costly tilting any ROI spreadsheet in their favor.

IF United didn’t furlough its because their contract, ratio of domestic/international titled the ROI of a furlough in the pilots favor. Has little bearing on Kirby's foresight vs Parker on when this would end.

AA parked 4 fleet types, and claims they knocked 1B in overhead off of 2019 volume.

I don’t have any numbers yet but I believe the June cancels are due to AA scheduling more block hours than Delta or United.

I highly doubt Delta or United could park 4 fleets and only suffer 3% capacity for 30-60 days.
Its clear that the path this company is on is satisfactory for you, and that’s okay. We’ll leave it as a simple disagreement on that.

But delta did not furlough. 35 hours of pay while not working is most certainly not a furlough.
Reply
Old 06-26-2021 | 04:26 PM
  #130  
flyinawa's Avatar
Weekend workaholic
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by brockenspectre
I did provide an explanation, down to the most simple form. My comment obviously rubbed you the wrong way, so you are obviously cognizant that what I said holds water.
Go back and sit at the kid’s table.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldmako
United
103
10-25-2019 12:02 PM
Fly Navy
Career Questions
63
02-06-2014 08:39 AM
Ottopilot
Hangar Talk
26
01-01-2011 06:20 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
07-12-2005 11:15 AM
Freighter Captain
Major
2
06-10-2005 11:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices