Search

Notices

Negotiation Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2022 | 08:49 PM
  #91  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
I could have flowed. I chose not to. I’m not angry. Just flabbergasted by your pilot group and your union. Can you articulate for me and anyone else following along why absorbing the regional flying and pilots into mainline is not a good idea?
I'm not sure what the benefit of absorbing the three WO is. I can see the benefit of merging the 3 WO.
Reply
Old 09-16-2022 | 09:45 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Snake1234
And there it is, the “your mom response”. Excellent. Bravo.

Excargo dog? That’s you isn’t it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 09-16-2022 | 09:57 PM
  #93  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 289
Likes: 51
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
Pilot expectations won’t align with what management can justify to their Boards, especially with the uncertainties of a recession looming. So we’ll all likely deal with making the same or less than regional pilots until we either agree to less than we deserve or don’t agree and keep negotiating until we hit more favorable conditions.

It's worse than that. Rough breakdown of hourly wages per available seats (50 seater vs narrow body, APC numbers).

AA FO
Year 1: $0.45 / seat
Year 2: $0.69 / seat
Year 3: $0.82 / seat

WO FO
Year 1: $1.8 / seat
Year 2: $1.94 / seat
Year 3: $2.1 / seat

That's our worth. Over two to three times less than a 1500h CFI (no offense to them).

It goes downhill from there, looking at captains and/or wide-bodies. To that, add the incomprehensible delayed yearly raise, and no 401k for the poor bastards who actually interviewed for the job.

Insulting, and embarrassing.

I fully anticipate working under another subpar industry trailing turd. Too many folks at this airline are willing to sandbag everyone for a quick check on their way out.
Reply
Old 09-17-2022 | 05:09 AM
  #94  
Swakid8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by Snake1234
You are correct on schedule flexibility. Who gives a **** about first year pilots, I’m serious. Lastly, what is not disappointing for a pay raise? Define it. 18% is not bad. After 2 years, a NB CA would nearly make what our WB CA make today at the 12 year pay mark.
‘Username checks out……
Reply
Old 09-17-2022 | 05:13 AM
  #95  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Montcalm
It's worse than that. Rough breakdown of hourly wages per available seats (50 seater vs narrow body, APC numbers).

AA FO
Year 1: $0.45 / seat
Year 2: $0.69 / seat
Year 3: $0.82 / seat

WO FO
Year 1: $1.8 / seat
Year 2: $1.94 / seat
Year 3: $2.1 / seat

That's our worth. Over two to three times less than a 1500h CFI (no offense to them).

It goes downhill from there, looking at captains and/or wide-bodies. To that, add the incomprehensible delayed yearly raise, and no 401k for the poor bastards who actually interviewed for the job.

Insulting, and embarrassing.

I fully anticipate working under another subpar industry trailing turd. Too many folks at this airline are willing to sandbag everyone for a quick check on their way out.
I doubt a TA with so many shortfalls will be send out for a vote. Let's just hope the economy doesn't tank in the meantime.

There should be ZERO pay difference between WO flow and an OTS new hire.

Last edited by NotPhlying; 09-17-2022 at 05:28 AM.
Reply
Old 09-17-2022 | 06:17 AM
  #96  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 444
Likes: 99
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
I could have flowed. I chose not to. I’m not angry. Just flabbergasted by your pilot group and your union. Can you articulate for me and anyone else following along why absorbing the regional flying and pilots into mainline is not a good idea?
Probably because someone a lot smarter than you crunched the numbers and realized they would make more money (i.e. the stock price would stay higher) that way.
Reply
Old 09-17-2022 | 06:31 AM
  #97  
PRS Guitars's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,329
Likes: 4
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
I could have flowed. I chose not to. I’m not angry. Just flabbergasted by your pilot group and your union. Can you articulate for me and anyone else following along why absorbing the regional flying and pilots into mainline is not a good idea?
Im pretty sure it’s AA that is against this. Once they do that they will have to do the same for WO gate agents, rampers, FA’s etc, and the costs go up. I would be for this personally, I think it’s more options for our pilots. We’d have to get the group 1 pay rates sorted and it would affect OTS hiring of military for a few years but that would sort out eventually too and we’d be like SWA with no feed and no problem hiring.
Reply
Old 09-17-2022 | 07:02 AM
  #98  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
Im pretty sure it’s AA that is against this. Once they do that they will have to do the same for WO gate agents, rampers, FA’s etc, and the costs go up. I would be for this personally, I think it’s more options for our pilots. We’d have to get the group 1 pay rates sorted and it would affect OTS hiring of military for a few years but that would sort out eventually too and we’d be like SWA with no feed and no problem hiring.
Nah. They’d hire all the ground types under Piedmont like they do now. There’d be no change there. It might even allow them to drop quite a bit of middle management.

The FAs maybe would have to be brought aboard.

Someone else before you mentioned how it would affect OTS/MIL hires. It would but: I worked in the training dept at a WO. I can 1 million % assure you that AA management could not care one bit less about quality of pilots. If they meet the minimum(pass training) they are a qualified line pilot. That’s all AA cares about, bodies. Where those bodies come from no one cares.
Reply
Old 09-17-2022 | 07:12 AM
  #99  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 369
Likes: 62
Default

Legacy AA guy here. Please stop whining.

Whose group is signing up to be Check Pilots? Hint not legacy pilots, they are quitting in droves.

Snake1234 is dividing our pilots. Don’t pay attention to him.

Some people on this thread really come across as whiny. Relax. We all want a contract. Personally I could care less about the pay rates. I want quality of life.

I recently flew with a pilot that boasted of crediting 180 hrs. and 200 hrs. over the last two months and was up to 120 so far that month. He was *****ing about the contract. To each his own but he is not helping our cause. Stop whining about us old guys and consult your greedy peers. Thanks.

I have NEVER done overtime and don’t plan on it either.
Reply
Old 09-17-2022 | 08:09 AM
  #100  
Sike's Avatar
Atmospheric Penetrator
20 Years
30 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 248
Likes: 1
Default

This guy gets it ^^^^

Twenty five years ago, pilots flew 70-75hrs per month, made more money (relatively), then went home to their families with their brains intact. I'd take better rigs over better premium pay all day. It's time to put an end to the wh*ring era.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boeing Aviator
=> United Contract 2022
5
07-22-2022 11:19 PM
Paid2flyfast
Career Questions
0
02-13-2022 07:33 PM
Scoop
Delta
17
01-31-2020 07:21 AM
chrtrplt
Cargo
16
09-24-2006 12:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices