Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
APA Fails to Raise the Bar >

APA Fails to Raise the Bar


Notices

APA Fails to Raise the Bar

Old 08-01-2023 | 09:48 AM
  #111  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 86
Default

Originally Posted by TankerDriver
Ooooooooh.... this definitely changes things. I was a no vote regardless. I've paid $1,800 in union dues already this year to APA for something ALPA gave us. I'm a little ticked and so should everyone else be. We'd still be at 6 or 12% pay raises right now with a bunch of people ready to hit the "yes" button.
There are some things that are easy to cut and paste, but the details are really, really important. For instance, "hey, let's have a self-directed MBCBP!", but MBCB plans cannot be self-directed. That's the whole point, is that it is a defined benefit plan, which gives you access to a different set of limits than DC plans. But DB plans cannot be directed by the recipient, they must be professionally managed. It took DALPA almost 3 years of work with professional finance houses to put together theirs. It's not something you pull off the shelf.

The 10 hour duty pay is not a rig. It pays no matter what, and is not offset by anything. For reserves, it's above guarantee.
Reply
Old 08-01-2023 | 09:55 AM
  #112  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by pilot28042
Are we lacking reassignment time provisions?

Right now it’s 0159 or 4 hours after sequence whatever is later
what is it in 2.0?
Thats for RO. The new RO is 4 hours and the 0159 is gone.

The TA reassignment limitation is “no more than one calendar day.”
Reply
Old 08-01-2023 | 10:00 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
There are some things that are easy to cut and paste, but the details are really, really important. For instance, "hey, let's have a self-directed MBCBP!", but MBCB plans cannot be self-directed. That's the whole point, is that it is a defined benefit plan, which gives you access to a different set of limits than DC plans. But DB plans cannot be directed by the recipient, they must be professionally managed. It took DALPA almost 3 years of work with professional finance houses to put together theirs. It's not something you pull off the shelf.

The 10 hour duty pay is not a rig. It pays no matter what, and is not offset by anything. For reserves, it's above guarantee.
Yep and the management fees are going to be a bit higher than what you'd see with ETF's or Mutual/Index funds that are usually in the .015-.1% range.
Reply
Old 08-01-2023 | 10:00 AM
  #114  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Easyflier301
Ok so the point remains the same…would you advocate to forgo the existing TA proposed pairing limitations in exchange for 10 hour FDP, and then theoretically go to DAL trip construction limits (minimal and yet TBD on how they will change even further with 10 hour FDP)?

All I’m saying, is APA negotiators considered that and decided no to that question for the good of AA pilots. I’m not defending them or advocating either way. But generally speaking, I think I would be in favor of contractual trip construction limits instead of the 10 hour FDP. Enough of my trips just don’t go over that and it’s just not enough of a pain point for me to say, “yeah, give me that limitation with the possibility of a lot more longer trips.”
No. That point does not remain the same. APA needs to negotiate wins not a cost/manning neutral solution for the company’s problems that then get labeled as a win for us.

UAL has sequence limits and the 10 hour duty.
Reply
Old 08-01-2023 | 10:18 AM
  #115  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
Thats for RO. The new RO is 4 hours and the 0159 is gone.

The TA reassignment limitation is “no more than one calendar day.”
so similar to the others.
I hope they release a contract comparison
Reply
Old 08-01-2023 | 11:34 AM
  #116  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 1,161
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
This isn't exactly accurate. It is true that reserves are able to go to the ALV+15, but only if they grab you while you're below the reserve guarantee. The reserve guarantee is the ALV minus 2. Once you reach your reserve guarantee, you are "Full" have have no further obligation to the company. For example, if you have 65 hours for the month, and the reserve guarantee is 74 (76 ALV minus 2). You fly a 2 day trip worth 10:30, and that brings you to 75:30 for the month. You are now over your guarantee, so you are done for the month. OTOH, if you flew a one day trip for 5:15, you'd now be 70:15, you could still be assigned a trip all the way up to the ALV+15 depending on the days of availability you have left.

Many pilots attempt to fill up at the beginning of the month so they fill up before they run out of days of availability. This is something reserves can preference for trip coverage.
To add to this, at DL going anywhere near ALV+15 is very rare. Getting more than a couple hours over a reserve guarantee not even remotely common. There are lots of ways to manage around that.

Also, DL cannot give you any trip which exceeds your remaining days on call - so in the above example, just because you are 3:45 short of being “Full”, doesn’t mean you can fly another 20ish hours if you don’t have 4 consecutive days of reserve remaining. If you only have 1 day remaining, you still can only fly that one day for a couple hours “over”. Since the maximum Reserve Guarantee is 80 hours, it’s actually really hard to exceed 85 via trip assignments, even if you want to.

Originally Posted by AXNKAA
Good info, thank you! So basically it’s reserves can fly 87-99 hours. So yes AA’s hard 85 is better than that. I do believe some of this is being lost in the uproar over TA 2.0.
See above, very, very few DL pilots are ever getting trips totaling over 85 hours. It’s possible, yes, but any comparison to a “hard limit” of 85 cannot assume the upper end of the limit, or that it happens much at all.

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
I could MAYBE stretch my brain a little and say we matched DAL. Not sure I could get there but it isn't unreasonable. To say we matched UAL is simply not true. Period. APA's email after UAL's AIP had 23 bullet points that they considered industry standard. We achieved 4 of them from our most recent talks. These are not industry leading items they are industry standard. We can't even get to industry standard other than pay rates or other pay related items.

The townhall last night was embarrassing. APA is a peewee town league team playing against the KC Chiefs at the negotiating table. Run over and trampled on.

Edit: There a multiple unchanged items from UAL, DAL, AA that AA will remain industry trailing. Things that UAL and DAL already had but didn't improved in their most recent bargaining. Hotels, etc.
Are you serious, it’s a stretch to think AA matched DL, then UA? Really? We would easily come up with more than 23 bullet list items which matched. On balance, everyone knows APA came in very low on pay rates, and then matched DL’s AIP to the penny. Plus lots of other matched items like retro of 4/4/14, and other work rules as well. UA then matched DL and added 2% to the pay rates after our snap-up clause. AA then “matched” that…. Again. I don’t know why what’s so hard to “stretch” your brain around. Without DL and UA, AA’s contract would be billions lower.

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
Thats for RO. The new RO is 4 hours and the 0159 is gone.

The TA reassignment limitation is “no more than one calendar day.”
FYI, DL is the same. No more than one calendar day past original footprint
Reply
Old 08-01-2023 | 01:11 PM
  #117  
NuGuy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 86
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
FYI, DL is the same. No more than one calendar day past original footprint
Reroute off of your original rotation and reroute outside your trip window are two different things now as well. The pay treatment now stacks with each other.

Let's say you get rerouted on just your last day (with all the restrictions that go with that), you're making 150%. If they also take you outside your original release by 4 hours or more (non-ocean crossing), you're going to get an extra 100% for the entire last duty period. If they take you into the next day, that's two duty periods with 100% premium. So, essentially 100% for what you do, 50% for the non-original legs, and an extra 100% for the last duty period(s).

250% pay on the days you get in late and fly an extra day. Release after midnight for bonus points. If you happen to be on a green slip....well, you get the idea.
Reply
Old 08-01-2023 | 01:28 PM
  #118  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Are you serious, it’s a stretch to think AA matched DL, then UA? Really? We would easily come up with more than 23 bullet list items which matched. On balance, everyone knows APA came in very low on pay rates, and then matched DL’s AIP to the penny. Plus lots of other matched items like retro of 4/4/14, and other work rules as well. UA then matched DL and added 2% to the pay rates after our snap-up clause. AA then “matched” that…. Again. I don’t know why what’s so hard to “stretch” your brain around. Without DL and UA, AA’s contract would be billions lower.
I think maybe you need to relax a little and read what I said again.

I’ll help: I said it would be a stretch to say that AA matched DAL and that we definitely did not match UAL.
Reply
Old 08-01-2023 | 01:52 PM
  #119  
StoneQOLdCrazy's Avatar
Bent over by buybacks
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 541
Default

Originally Posted by TankerDriver
Yep and the management fees are going to be a bit higher than what you'd see with ETF's or Mutual/Index funds that are usually in the .015-.1% range.
DL's MBCBP management fees, through a CIT, are going to be about .03 - .04

man is there a lot of contortionism trying to cherry pick at the margins where APA possibly on DALPA an UAL. But it won't change the fact that APA didn't raise the bar, period.
Reply
Old 08-01-2023 | 02:04 PM
  #120  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 1,161
Default

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
I think maybe you need to relax a little and read what I said again.

I’ll help: I said it would be a stretch to say that AA matched DAL and that we definitely did not match UAL.
That's what I read the first time. Are you trying to say that AA tried to match, but fell short? Are we talking past one another? Genuine question.

Because when you look at the APA website at https://negotiations.alliedpilots.org/Contract2023 > TA Summary. Here are just a few things that match DL, with help from UA (who matched DL and added 2%):
- Pay tables, to the penny
- 4/4/14 Retro
- 17% DC in 2024 and 18% in 2026,
- Profit Sharing formula
- Vacation paying 4:35
- Training pay of 3:05/day
- Training withdrawal option
- Reassignment pay at 150% day 1, 200% day 2
- 2:00 pay for release between 0000-0159
- sit pay exceeding 2:30 (DL actually 3 going to 2 on 1/1/24)
- LTD 50% of Final earnings (APA exceeded DL with "no offsets")
- MBCBP
- And more
Attached Images
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Splanky
Regional
8
08-22-2008 05:09 AM
AAflyer
Major
42
05-13-2007 05:48 PM
Freight Dog
Cargo
40
09-18-2006 08:13 AM
Diesel 10
Cargo
9
11-16-2005 07:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices