Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
APA officially in negotiations with ALPA >

APA officially in negotiations with ALPA

Search

Notices

APA officially in negotiations with ALPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2025 | 05:03 PM
  #241  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,114
Likes: 291
Default

I've wondered if instead of buying off $500k pilots, we could employ $500k lawyers to represent us.

I'd think $500k buys a lot more lawyer than pilot.

Committees are mostly volunteer so not much change there.
Reply
Old 10-14-2025 | 05:48 PM
  #242  
JulesWinfield's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,823
Likes: 224
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
I've wondered if instead of buying off $500k pilots, we could employ $500k lawyers to represent us.

I'd think $500k buys a lot more lawyer than pilot.

Committees are mostly volunteer so not much change there.
ALPA pilots negotiate contracts, as well.
Reply
Old 10-14-2025 | 07:22 PM
  #243  
Not a fed just going home
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 115
Likes: 54
Default

Just a question why is the Gustin amendment bad? Considering a non vote as a "No" makes sense.

That is the way how it works when trying to certify a new union. That's how it is with decertifying unions, and even card drives.

If things aren't even bad enough to get regular folks to tune in and vote then why make a change? A small vocal minority gets to force the broader group to change when they are at least marginally satisfied? Doesn't make sense to me but happy to hear counter arguments.
Reply
Old 10-14-2025 | 07:29 PM
  #244  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 960
Likes: 255
Default

Originally Posted by Point85ToTheFix
Just a question why is the Gustin amendment bad? Considering a non vote as a "No" makes sense.

That is the way how it works when trying to certify a new union. That's how it is with decertifying unions, and even card drives.

If things aren't even bad enough to get regular folks to tune in and vote then why make a change? A small vocal minority gets to force the broader group to change when they are at least marginally satisfied? Doesn't make sense to me but happy to hear counter arguments.
You can’t be serious.
Reply
Old 10-14-2025 | 09:09 PM
  #245  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 443
Likes: 142
Default

Originally Posted by Point85ToTheFix
Just a question why is the Gustin amendment bad? Considering a non vote as a "No" makes sense.

That is the way how it works when trying to certify a new union. That's how it is with decertifying unions, and even card drives.

If things aren't even bad enough to get regular folks to tune in and vote then why make a change? A small vocal minority gets to force the broader group to change when they are at least marginally satisfied? Doesn't make sense to me but happy to hear counter arguments.
This is not about certifying / decertifying any union. This is about a NEGOTIATED merger. If regular APA voting procedures counted all non-voters as being in favor of the incumbent, there would never be any turnover.

The Gustin amendment is complete unethical, it takes advantage of the unengaged membership. It's undemocratic to take away a pilot's ability to abstain.
Reply
Old 10-14-2025 | 10:19 PM
  #246  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 579
Likes: 152
Default

Originally Posted by Point85ToTheFix
Just a question why is the Gustin amendment bad? Considering a non vote as a "No" makes sense.

That is the way how it works when trying to certify a new union. That's how it is with decertifying unions, and even card drives.

If things aren't even bad enough to get regular folks to tune in and vote then why make a change? A small vocal minority gets to force the broader group to change when they are at least marginally satisfied? Doesn't make sense to me but happy to hear counter arguments.
I say make contract votes and BOD elections the same way.

Contract votes are the only thing that will have a chance to meet the threshold. No one will get elected and no member vote referendums will ever progress under such rules.
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 05:04 AM
  #247  
Line Holder
Community Favorite
Loved
5 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 310
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by DogPit
You can’t be serious.
I hope they aren’t serious either.
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 06:10 AM
  #248  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 323
Likes: 210
Default

Can the Gustin amendment be repealed? Is that what is happening?
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 07:07 AM
  #249  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 136
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Point85ToTheFix
Just a question why is the Gustin amendment bad? Considering a non vote as a "No" makes sense.

That is the way how it works when trying to certify a new union. That's how it is with decertifying unions, and even card drives.

If things aren't even bad enough to get regular folks to tune in and vote then why make a change? A small vocal minority gets to force the broader group to change when they are at least marginally satisfied? Doesn't make sense to me but happy to hear counter arguments.
If you don’t care enough to actually vote then it probably doesn’t matter to you either way, in that case it’s the ones who care enough to vote yes or no who should have the say.
Reply
Old 10-15-2025 | 06:14 PM
  #250  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,206
Likes: 1,155
Default

Originally Posted by As786
And you believe “professional negotiators” and resources negotiated those ual and dal contracts. Hey, the tooth fairy isn’t real either?

Hate to break it to ya, change of unions ain’t gonna do 💩, when it’s your fellow co-workers who do the negotiations, company don’t give a rats *** whose sitting across the table from them. It’s either gonna get done or not.
ALPA has full time contract-law attorney's on staff who help directly in contract negotiations. When folks complain about hiring "professional negotiators", they don't actually realize that ALPA has them on staff full time. And, they are way more specialized/up to speed on the intricacies of aviation contracts than any 'consultant' law firm can ever be. Just saying...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jerryleber
=> United Contract 2022
61
09-02-2022 11:51 AM
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
heykerrdog
Union Talk
16
10-27-2014 05:58 PM
superduck
Union Talk
420
06-20-2011 10:00 PM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices