USAPA Board Approves MOU
#241
I suspect that this NDA might be "open ended" meaning the involved parties did not stipulate a mutual expiration period. This reeks of ToHo legally "GAGGING" DP in order to complete AA restructuring unimpeded...
Why has the UCC allowed this to occur?? If in fact, the AA/US merger brings better returns when compared to AA stand alone, why haven't they pulled the trigger already??
I think DP, like a mischievous little dog, has been collared, leashed, and muzzled..
AMR is a master of deception..When all eyes are on center stage, the real show is taking place on the side ring...
Why has the UCC allowed this to occur?? If in fact, the AA/US merger brings better returns when compared to AA stand alone, why haven't they pulled the trigger already??
I think DP, like a mischievous little dog, has been collared, leashed, and muzzled..
AMR is a master of deception..When all eyes are on center stage, the real show is taking place on the side ring...
#242
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
I suspect that this NDA might be "open ended" meaning the involved parties did not stipulate a mutual expiration period. This reeks of ToHo legally "GAGGING" DP in order to complete AA restructuring unimpeded...
Why has the UCC allowed this to occur?? If in fact, the AA/US merger brings better returns when compared to AA stand alone, why haven't they pulled the trigger already??
I think DP, like a mischievous little dog, has been collared, leashed, and muzzled..
AMR is a master of deception..When all eyes are on center stage, the real show is taking place on the side ring...
Why has the UCC allowed this to occur?? If in fact, the AA/US merger brings better returns when compared to AA stand alone, why haven't they pulled the trigger already??
I think DP, like a mischievous little dog, has been collared, leashed, and muzzled..
AMR is a master of deception..When all eyes are on center stage, the real show is taking place on the side ring...
Last edited by justjack; 01-12-2013 at 09:31 AM.
#243
The west's final offer going into arbitration was to staple over 900 active, working US pilots. Read the Nicolau award and opinion, it's in there.
According to the law and recent court rulings the union has the rights you question, subject to DFR. Like it or not, USAPA was legally elected. When USAPA was formed most west pilots refused to join. It wasn't until after Susie's day in court when they found out they would have to pay that most decided to join.
You guys(no one that I know of) have always refused to participate in any C&Rs. Recently USAPA sent out a message saying that times have changed and C&R need to be looked at and changed and that they welcomed input. Our attorney's have reached out to AOL and it's attorney's for input and have been told Nic unaltered or we continue the fight. Have you offered any other solutions than that? If not, that's fine, but why complain about it?
According to the law and recent court rulings the union has the rights you question, subject to DFR. Like it or not, USAPA was legally elected. When USAPA was formed most west pilots refused to join. It wasn't until after Susie's day in court when they found out they would have to pay that most decided to join.
You guys(no one that I know of) have always refused to participate in any C&Rs. Recently USAPA sent out a message saying that times have changed and C&R need to be looked at and changed and that they welcomed input. Our attorney's have reached out to AOL and it's attorney's for input and have been told Nic unaltered or we continue the fight. Have you offered any other solutions than that? If not, that's fine, but why complain about it?
#244
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
They were told from the start, actually before the start that the west wouldn't have anything to do with them and would do everything possible to destroy them. So with that background, no.
#245
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: B777/CA retired
Posts: 1,483
USAPA has done nothing in the last 6 years to change the opinion of anyone from the west. USAPA is a shining example of self interest and cronyism run amuck. Just look at the little theatrics emanating from CLT reps right now.
#246
Flies With The Hat On
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
Yes, because the west knew from the start that adult supervision was needed to handle the dispute between groups.
USAPA has done nothing in the last 6 years to change the opinion of anyone from the west. USAPA is a shining example of self interest and cronyism run amuck. Just look at the little theatrics emanating from CLT reps right now.
USAPA has done nothing in the last 6 years to change the opinion of anyone from the west. USAPA is a shining example of self interest and cronyism run amuck. Just look at the little theatrics emanating from CLT reps right now.
It mast have been painful for West pilots to learn of the unanimous MOU vote.
And what is wrong with with self interest? Ayn Rand called it a virtue when she wrote Atlas Shrugged.
Last edited by flybywire44; 01-12-2013 at 05:32 PM.
#247
According to the law and recent court rulings the union has the rights you question, subject to DFR. Like it or not, USAPA was legally elected. When USAPA was formed most west pilots refused to join. It wasn't until after Susie's day in court when they found out they would have to pay that most decided to join.
You guys(no one that I know of) have always refused to participate in any C&Rs. Recently USAPA sent out a message saying that times have changed and C&R need to be looked at and changed and that they welcomed input. Our attorney's have reached out to AOL and it's attorney's for input and have been told Nic unaltered or we continue the fight. Have you offered any other solutions than that? If not, that's fine, but why complain about it?
Why would your attorneys reach out to AOL? I don't pay AOL dues money. USAPA has to do the right thing if they want exclusive right to represent the US pilots. Problem is, the same goobers that screwed you up when you were ALPA are the same ones screwing things up for you now. And they have absolutely no experience in doing the right thing.
Are you starting to see a pattern here? I can assure you APA has and there will be few if any positions within APA filled by the amateurs from USAPA.
I have offered many solutions, but all of them start with replacing USAPA. Why? Because you can't fix stupid.
#248
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
You got that right and we can use you as exhibit A.
I said: "The west's final offer going into arbitration was to staple over 900 active, working US pilots. Read the Nicolau award and opinion, it's in there."
You said "Nope-wrong again."
From the Nicolau Opinion and Award, available to you on cactuspilot.com. You should read it some time. You guys have paid enough for the website.
"The America West Proposal
America West's initial proposal differed dramatically from that of
US Airways. As previously indicated, its position, when first presented
in detail, was a series of ratios accompanied with a two year condition
and restriction reserving to US Airways pilots all Captain positions on
the 9 A330 aircraft flying international routes as of May 19, 2005. The
first proposed ratio was not Captain to Captain. Instead, America West
added to its 855 Captains an additional 114 First Officers, who,
America West claimed, expected captaincies based on the 19 A320s on
firm order as of May 2005. That combined figure (969) was to be
integrated on a straight ratio basis with 1121 US Airways Captains, a
number derived from staffing assumptions based on what 'were 221 US
Airways aircraft as of February 2006. This ratio would be followed by an
integration of the remaining America West First Officers (925) with
1051 US Airways First Officers, also on a straight ratio basis. After the
reinsertion of those on extended medical leaves and those in nonflying
positions, this would put 2431 US Airways pilots on the bottom of
the list, 959 of whom were active pilots as of May 19, 2005 with the
remaining 1472 furloughees.
Like that of US Airways, America West's position was not
substantially modified during the proceedings. "
Those are your beloved George Nicolau's words, not mine. Back to your Navajo, or cubicle.
I said: "The west's final offer going into arbitration was to staple over 900 active, working US pilots. Read the Nicolau award and opinion, it's in there."
You said "Nope-wrong again."
From the Nicolau Opinion and Award, available to you on cactuspilot.com. You should read it some time. You guys have paid enough for the website.
"The America West Proposal
America West's initial proposal differed dramatically from that of
US Airways. As previously indicated, its position, when first presented
in detail, was a series of ratios accompanied with a two year condition
and restriction reserving to US Airways pilots all Captain positions on
the 9 A330 aircraft flying international routes as of May 19, 2005. The
first proposed ratio was not Captain to Captain. Instead, America West
added to its 855 Captains an additional 114 First Officers, who,
America West claimed, expected captaincies based on the 19 A320s on
firm order as of May 2005. That combined figure (969) was to be
integrated on a straight ratio basis with 1121 US Airways Captains, a
number derived from staffing assumptions based on what 'were 221 US
Airways aircraft as of February 2006. This ratio would be followed by an
integration of the remaining America West First Officers (925) with
1051 US Airways First Officers, also on a straight ratio basis. After the
reinsertion of those on extended medical leaves and those in nonflying
positions, this would put 2431 US Airways pilots on the bottom of
the list, 959 of whom were active pilots as of May 19, 2005 with the
remaining 1472 furloughees.
Like that of US Airways, America West's position was not
substantially modified during the proceedings. "
Those are your beloved George Nicolau's words, not mine. Back to your Navajo, or cubicle.
#249
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Yes, because the west knew from the start that adult supervision was needed to handle the dispute between groups.
USAPA has done nothing in the last 6 years to change the opinion of anyone from the west. USAPA is a shining example of self interest and cronyism run amuck. Just look at the little theatrics emanating from CLT reps right now.
USAPA has done nothing in the last 6 years to change the opinion of anyone from the west. USAPA is a shining example of self interest and cronyism run amuck. Just look at the little theatrics emanating from CLT reps right now.
I have to say that the west's words and actions have hardened my opinions towards them too.
#250
I give you just a tad bit more than the average east pilot because you did in fact donate. The problem with you is did not do enough and yes you are your brothers keeper. It matters not what you wanted after the fact as that ship sailed. The last 5 plus years have been nothing but east stalling which has been a dagger plunged into the hearts of the west. We played your game and we played to the end and then you refused to pay. You will have to forgive us for feeling that you all low lifes.
The east with their move has been the worst that this industry has ever seen. Thru the east's actions they have allowed a management team to keep and hold down an entire pilot group making LCC the worst paid pilots in the country for class and craft. Now there is something that you all can be very proud of as it will go down in history that way.
WD at AWA
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post