Search

Notices

AA procedures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2013 | 08:23 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default AA procedures

So on another board some guys are discussing some procedures that AA uses that seem odd to me and I was wondering if it was just some web board BS.

Fo's can't start engines?

Fo's can't make pa's?

Fo's can't fly imc approaches?

Can this be correct?
Reply
Old 02-17-2013 | 08:29 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 9
Default

True to a certain extent. AA is still stuck in the 1950s.

All engine starts are CAs (referring to start switches.) FO puts up the fuel levers.

PAs- AA is VERY old school. Only PA the FO makes is the gate arrival PA (totally worthless.) even "FAs Prepare for Takeoff" is made by the CA -WHILE TAXIING!

Approaches: CA must land the aircraft if visibility is less than 1/4sm or 4000RVR.

Please USAir help make some changes!
Reply
Old 02-17-2013 | 08:46 AM
  #3  
RI830's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 0
From: Left seat on a kite
Default

Old School!

Cockpit Resource Management - YouTube
Reply
Old 02-17-2013 | 08:48 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by aa73
True to a certain extent. AA is still stuck in the 1950s.

All engine starts are CAs (referring to start switches.) FO puts up the fuel levers.

PAs- AA is VERY old school. Only PA the FO makes is the gate arrival PA (totally worthless.) even "FAs Prepare for Takeoff" is made by the CA -WHILE TAXIING!

Approaches: CA must land the aircraft if visibility is less than 1/4sm or 4000RVR.

Please USAir help make some changes!
All true, but its 3/4 or 4000RVR. Assume that's just an accidental misstatement.
Reply
Old 02-17-2013 | 08:55 AM
  #5  
lionflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RI830
Dang!! That was Rex Cramer that got billyslapped!
CRM: Captain's Right MF!!!
Reply
Old 02-17-2013 | 08:57 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Wow that makes no sense, let's hope that get's changed asap.
Reply
Old 02-17-2013 | 09:03 AM
  #7  
EV120's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Watching, always watching...
Default

XJET is the same. Less than 3/4 or 4000 rvr is considered Low Vis, and a Monitered App must be conducted, resulting the the CA landing.
Reply
Old 02-17-2013 | 09:14 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

I guess a lot of that will be driven by who ends up running flight ops.

Parker did say that we would mostly use AA systems and procedures because they learned it was easier to have the small group change than the big one.
Reply
Old 02-17-2013 | 09:17 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Reverse Cowgirl
Default

Fine with me. I'd rather not do the PA anyway. Looking forward to being FO again..lol
Reply
Old 02-17-2013 | 09:29 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
All true, but its 3/4 or 4000RVR. Assume that's just an accidental misstatement.
I don't see why thats a big deal. I mean how many times is the RVR exactly 4000 and the FO can't land?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gajre539
The Boneyard
0
07-19-2010 01:45 PM
EmbraerFlyer
Major
27
02-02-2009 03:43 PM
CAL EWR
Major
146
10-13-2008 09:15 PM
TOGA
Money Talk
1
09-16-2007 09:16 PM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
5
11-28-2006 10:03 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices