Search
Notices

Nic ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2014, 09:09 AM
  #391  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 2,180
Default

Originally Posted by Frisco727 View Post
I understand what happened two weeks ago yet I'm concerned it exposes the APA to possible liability and I fight I am not interested in seeing.
The APA has an agreement in writing with USAPA and the Company.

It seems Vice President Roghair's concerns were worked out.

So other than stirring the pot, what was the point of that post?
EMBFlyer is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 09:16 AM
  #392  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frisco727's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by EMBFlyer View Post
The APA has an agreement in writing with USAPA and the Company.

It seems Vice President Roghair's concerns were worked out.

So other than stirring the pot, what was the point of that post?
Stirring the pot? I certainly have the right to my opinion that USAPA is an entity which refuses to abide by binding arbitration, agreements, wants to continue as a pseudo union after decertification.

If that's stirring the pot, I'll get a shovel and do more than simply stir the pot.
Frisco727 is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 09:58 AM
  #393  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: Done with that
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
USAPAs DOH proposal for east/west is already dead, the west won that. But some west will never be happy absent the Nic.
So how did I do on my predictions? I believe I said APA would become the BA. Correct there no vote. I said the DC lawsuit was a legal strategy (fancy term for bargaining chip or leverage). I heard they dropped it. Correct there. I said APA would not let USAPA on property. Wrong, but they are severely limited to MC work ONLY, so partial credit there. Lastly, I said APA would allow the West a seat. They did in a round about way. What APA really managed was to shift liability off of themselves from both East or West. Who are you going to sue if either side does not like the results? Not APA, they did not make the decision. I would not have thought USAPA would agree to that. I am sure it was under threat of APA giving the West a seat in MB after they became BA. APA has managed to keep the East/West fight off the property, as I noted they wanted (per several friends with direct knowledge). Right again. Not bad for someone who does not know anything about the law.
My predictions for what is coming up next. I don't think the West will get NIC. This is not for "punishing" the East. What the East did was legal. As was the West keeping the East on regional wages for years. I suspect the West will get a seat, especially in light of the recent DJ that the East filed IN STATE COURT. That is a flag this is to delay the West from getting that money to use for MB. It will get kicked for jurisdiction to Federal Court causing more delay. I suspect the West to file in Federal Court to block or freeze to keep the East from using that money. In my opinion, USAPA made a big mistake. As a part of the MOU, they should have insisted the only monies to be used for MB is the money provided by the company. APA is much bigger and RICHER. They can outspend USAPA or the West three to one. Money wins. Finally, MB outcome. Key is to study the RECENT work of the arbitrators. It will come down much like UAL/CAL. Call it 2/3s of APA will be happy. 1/4 of USAPA will be happy. The rest not so happy. Fences for APAs WB aircraft. I do NOT think the arbitrators will fence the West from USAir WBs. That will be the "little jab" to USAPA. I also think the company might make the APA happy by moving native AA metal onto your routes, and retiring/ selling off the small number of WBs you currently have. Course, I might be all wrong. Just have to wait and see.
SewerPipeDvr is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 10:33 AM
  #394  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilot X's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: On all fours
Posts: 508
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
You are very welcome. I don't sleep at night now (nothing but island red eyes for cactiboss), so nothing will change. I believe that if the west gets a seat the airways pilots will be in Nic. order or very close. With that said, I fully expect every airways pilot east and west to get their behinds handed to them by the arbitrators, the american pilots will do very well.
I noticed phl 757 in the end of November flies to HNL.....do the west guys start flying Europe trips?
Pilot X is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 11:43 AM
  #395  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot X View Post
I noticed phl 757 in the end of November flies to HNL.....do the west guys start flying Europe trips?
The east is allowed to fly 2 Hawaii round trios per day and the west is allowed to fly 2 europe round trips per day. The west has never flown a single one.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 11:47 AM
  #396  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by SewerPipeDvr View Post
. I don't think the West will get NIC. This is not for "punishing" the East. What the East did was legal. As was the West keeping the East on regional wages for years.
So they will "punish" the west then. Why? Withou Nic they punish west, without accountng for 2005 positions they punish west. Why are they going to punish the west for what the east pilots did?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 11:56 AM
  #397  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilot X's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: On all fours
Posts: 508
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
The east is allowed to fly 2 Hawaii round trios per day and the west is allowed to fly 2 europe round trips per day. The west has never flown a single one.
I've never seen a Hawaii layover on the east before, I can't check west pairings so I was just asking so someone could look.

One east pairing starts on nov 28th and the other starts on nov 29th. Maybe it will be something new for December.
Pilot X is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 12:22 PM
  #398  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot X View Post
I've never seen a Hawaii layover on the east before, I can't check west pairings so I was just asking so someone could look.

One east pairing starts on nov 28th and the other starts on nov 29th. Maybe it will be something new for December.
They did a couple of years ago, usually it has to do with west birds being down for heavy check. We are metal neutral now so i assume its for lack of crews west.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 12:25 PM
  #399  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: A330
Posts: 1,043
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
The east is allowed to fly 2 Hawaii round trios per day and the west is allowed to fly 2 europe round trips per day. The west has never flown a single one.
Probably because you would end up in Greenland :-)
DCA A321 FO is offline  
Old 09-18-2014, 12:26 PM
  #400  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
They did a couple of years ago, usually it has to do with west birds being down for heavy check.
But that flight was from CLT. I don't believe that counted. I think the language allowed 2 trips a day from PHX. I do believe we have done some flying from PHX, but it wasn't very much and as you suggested, it was probably due to West planes down for MX...
algflyr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TWA4ME
American
44
07-22-2014 06:37 PM
algflyr
American
108
06-25-2014 11:03 AM
Errbus
American
233
01-30-2014 10:44 AM
R57 relay
American
222
01-17-2014 02:17 PM
cactiboss
Major
447
01-09-2012 07:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices