Search

Notices

Nic ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2014 | 03:02 PM
  #361  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by crzipilot
It was ran as one entity with separate seniority lists, separate fleets, contracts, separate flight attendants. Maybe a few other things....
I'm still confused when I get in a west plane! I have 3 different payroll, gadget, whatever numbers!

Funny, west pilots always seemed to be pleased that we were different until the MOU.
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 03:16 PM
  #362  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by crzipilot
It was ran as one entity
You can stop right there, one entity one management. That is the date arbitrators recognized on the UAL/CAL seniority award, EVERYTHING after (united furloughed while continental hired) was not accepted by the arbitrators.
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 03:18 PM
  #363  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
You can stop right there, one entity one management. That is the date arbitrators recognized on the UAL/CAL seniority award.
So you are going with a UA/CO style SLI? Have you talked to cactus one?
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 03:23 PM
  #364  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
So you are going with a UA/CO style SLI? Have you talked to cactus one?
Yeah, I think the arbitrators will recognize 2005 positions for usairways pilots and then plug us in to American using the cal/ual model. Whats cactus one saying?
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 03:48 PM
  #365  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

BTW cal/ual were done using ALPA merger policies, ours is going to be a free for all and the arbitrators will have a wide range of authority. I would guess relative position with fences on 330,350/777,787 for a period of 5 years
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 03:51 PM
  #366  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
and the arbitrators will have a wide range of authority.
Really? Not too sure about that...
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 04:02 PM
  #367  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by algflyr
Really? Not too sure about that...
Ours is being conducted under Allegheny-Mohawk LPP, only restrictions are in the MOU, no bump no flush etc.
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 04:09 PM
  #368  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Ours is being conducted under Allegheny-Mohawk LPP, only restrictions are in the MOU, no bump no flush etc.
And of course the restrictions in the PA...
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 04:17 PM
  #369  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by algflyr
And of course the restrictions in the PA...
which allow the parties to argue whatever they want and don't hinder the arbitrators like the Alpa rules do. The arbitrators in our case can consider whatever they please.
Reply
Old 09-15-2014 | 04:31 PM
  #370  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Default

Did that UAL/CAL SLI give some consideration to LOS to furloughed guys? think I remember hearing something about that.

How is that in any form the same ideals as the NIC?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TWA4ME
American
44
07-22-2014 06:37 PM
algflyr
American
108
06-25-2014 11:03 AM
Errbus
American
233
01-30-2014 10:44 AM
R57 relay
American
222
01-17-2014 02:17 PM
cactiboss
Major
447
01-09-2012 07:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices