Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
Official ATP rule - rumors? >

Official ATP rule - rumors?

Search
Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

Official ATP rule - rumors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2012, 08:13 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 381
Default

Some type of pilot shortage will emerge from this law. I have heard some new student pilots complaining about the law as they expected to be a jet FO with 350 tt. 1,500 hours is a logbook entry to far and they don't want to demean themsleves by becoming a CFI. It's the instant gratification crowd complaining.
BizPilot is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 07:19 AM
  #42  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 97
Default

They are going to finalize the rule this coming Spring (it was supposed to be done August 1st). We will see what effect the comments and suggestions will have on the final rule. With some regionals already paying a signing bonus to get bodies in the door, I would imagine that airline lobbyists are working hard to soften the qualifications to get an ATP.
Counselor is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 03:26 PM
  #43  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Originally Posted by Counselor View Post
They are going to finalize the rule this coming Spring (it was supposed to be done August 1st). We will see what effect the comments and suggestions will have on the final rule. With some regionals already paying a signing bonus to get bodies in the door, I would imagine that airline lobbyists are working hard to soften the qualifications to get an ATP.




Because asking for pilots engaged in ATP operations to have ATP levels of experience is like asking them to make "lunar landings."
block30 is offline  
Old 09-19-2012, 05:08 PM
  #44  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by block30 View Post



Because asking for pilots engaged in ATP operations to have ATP levels of experience is like asking them to make "lunar landings."
Not sure what the point is here. My point is that the 1500 hour requirement has already been watered down in the proposed reduction for the military (750 hours), and Riddle-type schools (1000 hours). I would imagine that airline lobbyists are seeking further relief to fill regional FO classes.
Counselor is offline  
Old 09-20-2012, 12:46 AM
  #45  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Originally Posted by Counselor View Post
Not sure what the point is here. My point is that the 1500 hour requirement has already been watered down in the proposed reduction for the military (750 hours), and Riddle-type schools (1000 hours). I would imagine that airline lobbyists are seeking further relief to fill regional FO classes.
My point is I agree with you. I agree that lobbying is going on to water down the bill.

My personal take is that flight experience matters, it takes time to develop one's self, just like any other profession. Certain institutions are looking to keep pilots replaceable---read that also as "use and abuseable."

I say no more. Time for management to step up and negotiate with us, instead of hacking down entire pilot groups at the knees. Time for the aviation consumer to pay the little extra that will make companies eek out a small profit, too.
block30 is offline  
Old 09-20-2012, 05:54 PM
  #46  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 10
Default

Really wish they would just make a final ruling on the restricted ATP. I am sure regionals would hire military and av. college pilots who have less than 1,500 tt if they knew that the NPRM was going to go into effect. That's a few spots on a seniority list.
HighFlyer22 is offline  
Old 09-24-2012, 12:14 AM
  #47  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 2
Default

I'm certain there is lobbying going on behind the scenes, but I also think just general politics are playing a factor. With an upcoming presidential and congressional election, I would bet the FAA is doing the old 'wait and see'.

That being said, I have heard that at least Piedmont is still hiring UND grads and the like with hours that should only make 1000 by next August.
Potato Heat On is offline  
Old 09-28-2012, 12:35 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: DiverDriver
Posts: 303
Default

The complaints are not only from the student pilots.... I am a pilot and complaining (680 ish total time, 60 ish multi, high performance-complex, tailwheel, instrument rated. I have been pursuing this dream to fly for a living for the past 6 years and between a combat deployment and life ( getting married, going to school... Graduating from school .... Go ASU! ) have tried to fly when not working. However it takes time to get there , and I understand that... But many pilots are supporting this rule and themselves were hired in the regional boom of 05-07 with 300 on up total time. For the old salty pilots on here who say " when I had xxx hours and low time wet commerical I did xxx" yet as time has passed those flying jobs are harder to smaller in numbers to find. Even building 1000 instructing is a huge feat and my hats off to all instructors who have passed that milestone, but again outside of pilot mills ( for foreign and domestic) and some universities, flying that many hours will take years....

It just sucks that this is blood legislation in response to a crash whose pilots would have passed these minimums ( minus the ATP) and for those like myself who started charging down this road years ago and now sit with experience and several hundred hours under my belt needing to gain almost all I have worked for to date.
93Sierra is offline  
Old 09-28-2012, 03:05 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by 93Sierra View Post
The complaints are not only from the student pilots.... I am a pilot and complaining (680 ish total time, 60 ish multi, high performance-complex, tailwheel, instrument rated. I have been pursuing this dream to fly for a living for the past 6 years and between a combat deployment and life ( getting married, going to school... Graduating from school .... Go ASU! ) have tried to fly when not working. However it takes time to get there , and I understand that... But many pilots are supporting this rule and themselves were hired in the regional boom of 05-07 with 300 on up total time. For the old salty pilots on here who say " when I had xxx hours and low time wet commerical I did xxx" yet as time has passed those flying jobs are harder to smaller in numbers to find. Even building 1000 instructing is a huge feat and my hats off to all instructors who have passed that milestone, but again outside of pilot mills ( for foreign and domestic) and some universities, flying that many hours will take years....

It just sucks that this is blood legislation in response to a crash whose pilots would have passed these minimums ( minus the ATP) and for those like myself who started charging down this road years ago and now sit with experience and several hundred hours under my belt needing to gain almost all I have worked for to date.
And some would say that it is too bad that it took "blood legislation" to get the ATP rule passed.
For full disclosure - I'm not sure which category you would put me in (especially since I'm not an airline pilot), but I fully support this rule and don't support any watering down of it for university/large school/0-Hero programs or the military.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 09-29-2012, 08:57 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,219
Default

Originally Posted by 93Sierra View Post
The complaints are not only from the student pilots.... I am a pilot and complaining (680 ish total time, 60 ish multi, high performance-complex, tailwheel, instrument rated. I have been pursuing this dream to fly for a living for the past 6 years and between a combat deployment and life ( getting married, going to school... Graduating from school .... Go ASU! ) have tried to fly when not working. However it takes time to get there , and I understand that... But many pilots are supporting this rule and themselves were hired in the regional boom of 05-07 with 300 on up total time. For the old salty pilots on here who say " when I had xxx hours and low time wet commerical I did xxx" yet as time has passed those flying jobs are harder to smaller in numbers to find. Even building 1000 instructing is a huge feat and my hats off to all instructors who have passed that milestone, but again outside of pilot mills ( for foreign and domestic) and some universities, flying that many hours will take years....

It just sucks that this is blood legislation in response to a crash whose pilots would have passed these minimums ( minus the ATP) and for those like myself who started charging down this road years ago and now sit with experience and several hundred hours under my belt needing to gain almost all I have worked for to date.
Yea, this! Filler.
coryk is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duksrule
Career Questions
21
06-22-2012 05:32 PM
backflip
Flight Schools and Training
3
11-18-2010 12:13 PM
Atrain77
Flight Schools and Training
10
02-09-2006 02:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices