Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
Official ATP rule - rumors? >

Official ATP rule - rumors?

Search
Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

Official ATP rule - rumors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2012, 08:43 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 145
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
That seems very odd. Does the school that wants to be able to fly without the ELT operational (see 91.207)?

Does it really say this in your TCO?

The possible issue with XCs is that this very easily gets out of control with instructors that are in it for themselves and not really giving value to the student. Combining stuff and making it an XC is fine, but as an example, if you really stink at a maneuver and have to learn it, it's better to talk about it on the ground and then try another day, rather than think that later on it might be better. On the other hand, with two students, it might be a great way to get some XC time and be just as efficient in terms of maneuvers and such. With some instructors, this is not the case and I've seen students getting the short end of the stick. They didn't know any better at the time unfortunately. Maybe this is another reason why they "don't want to go there", but again, it just seems very odd.

There wasn't a CFI recently "racking up XC" time on every flight was there?

If this is truly from the FAA, why not call up the POI and ask for some clarification?

Going to different airports semi-frequently is one of the best things you can do for experience (of a student).
Yep. All of the lessons in the TCO are labeled as 'local' or 'cross country'. The POI said anything that is 50nm or more and logged in the XC column of the logbook cannot be a 'local' flight at the same time. Don't get me started on how the regs say point to point is cross country, and somehow it is ok to go to an airport 49nm away, but if it is 50nm then suddenly it is a different category of flight and cannot count towards a 'local' lesson.

And, the problem may have stemmed from a couple instructors who were managing to log quite a few flights as XC. I can only imagine the POI pulled up the record of what of these students and was trying to figure out what was going on, and then made his ridiculous assessment. The chief pilot already had a meeting with us about the fact that he was seeing a number of students (who all belonged to the same few instructors) going way over on time and that had unusual percentages of XC flights, and basically told us we were only allowed to extend local flights into XCs if it was reasonable. But since a majority of what we fly are slow 2-seat aircraft, it is difficult to find an argument for dragging a student out from the airport on a flight where they are supposed to accomplish a bunch of maneuvers and some pattern work in 1-1.5 hours.
Celeste is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 03:25 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: DiverDriver
Posts: 303
Default

Have there been any changes proposed by the Regionals to the rule that are current?

The wave begins as far as retirement goes in December and training departments are ramping up. With many getting ready to jump
Ship from the regional to major level, they are sweating bullets. Anybody wanna fly in az hit me up.
93Sierra is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 05:58 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by 93Sierra View Post
Have there been any changes proposed by the Regionals to the rule that are current?

The wave begins as far as retirement goes in December and training departments are ramping up. With many getting ready to jump
Ship from the regional to major level, they are sweating bullets. Anybody wanna fly in az hit me up.
What are they hiring? Furloughed american, pinnacle, comair and others, or when congress wises up and cuts out the large amount of EAS pork? As some companies give up because they can't hack it anymore, some have openings due to attrition, but does that actually mean anything to new commercial/CFI pilots? Airlines condense down routes, get more efficient, try to get their load factors up, carry more people on one plane, etc, this as the pay and compensation slides lower and lower. Shortage? Sure...but not what most people not experienced with the industry think...
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 10-11-2012, 01:45 PM
  #64  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Originally Posted by 93Sierra View Post
Have there been any changes proposed by the Regionals to the rule that are current?

The wave begins as far as retirement goes in December and training departments are ramping up. With many getting ready to jump
Ship from the regional to major level, they are sweating bullets. Anybody wanna fly in az hit me up.

Who is "they" and why are they "sweating bullets?"
block30 is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 09:31 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mobius27's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 104
Default

Just thought I would share the info I just got. I emailed the FAA Investigator and got back a pretty informative response. They have it scheduled for publication in May of 2013. The status can be checked in the monthly report on this website: Report on DOT Significant Rulemakings | Department of Transportation
She said they received almost 600 comments, which I think is a little less then the first NPRM that came out. No word as to what the language of the rule currently states though.
mobius27 is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 09:53 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
Don't get me started on how the regs say point to point is cross country, and somehow it is ok to go to an airport 49nm away, but if it is 50nm then suddenly it is a different category of flight and cannot count towards a 'local' lesson.
If you were making the rules, what distance would you chose and how would you defend it when someone complained about why they can go xx miles and it is local, but xx miles is x/c?

And, the problem may have stemmed from a couple instructors who were managing to log quite a few flights as XC. I can only imagine the POI pulled up the record of what of these students and was trying to figure out what was going on, and then made his ridiculous assessment. The chief pilot already had a meeting with us about the fact that he was seeing a number of students (who all belonged to the same few instructors) going way over on time and that had unusual percentages of XC flights, and basically told us we were only allowed to extend local flights into XCs if it was reasonable. But since a majority of what we fly are slow 2-seat aircraft, it is difficult to find an argument for dragging a student out from the airport on a flight where they are supposed to accomplish a bunch of maneuvers and some pattern work in 1-1.5 hours.
So your fellow instructor pilots were fudging the rules and extending training flights and you want to point the finger elsewhere?
Hmmmmm.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 02:54 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: PNF
Posts: 622
Default

Originally Posted by mobius27 View Post
Just thought I would share the info I just got. I emailed the FAA Investigator and got back a pretty informative response. They have it scheduled for publication in May of 2013. The status can be checked in the monthly report on this website: Report on DOT Significant Rulemakings | Department of Transportation
She said they received almost 600 comments, which I think is a little less then the first NPRM that came out. No word as to what the language of the rule currently states though.
Saved everyone trouble of looking it up on here. Just to give everyone the schedule and expected dates to check back. Here it is.

To OST 12/31/2012
To OMB 01/31/2013
OMB Clearance 05/02/2013
Publication Date 05/17/2013
yimke is offline  
Old 11-10-2012, 08:57 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,219
Default

Originally Posted by yimke View Post
Saved everyone trouble of looking it up on here. Just to give everyone the schedule and expected dates to check back. Here it is.

To OST 12/31/2012
To OMB 01/31/2013
OMB Clearance 05/02/2013
Publication Date 05/17/2013
OST and OMB?
coryk is offline  
Old 11-10-2012, 11:13 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mobius27's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by coryk View Post
OST and OMB?
Office of Secretary of Transportation and Office of Management and Budget (White House).
mobius27 is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 04:35 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 145
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
If you were making the rules, what distance would you chose and how would you defend it when someone complained about why they can go xx miles and it is local, but xx miles is x/c?


So your fellow instructor pilots were fudging the rules and extending training flights and you want to point the finger elsewhere?
Hmmmmm.

USMCFLYR

When you look at the regs for ratings, it only specifies a minimum amount of cross country, not a minimum amount of local, nor maximum amount of cross country allowed. Technically one could do a whole rating of flights that were all 50nm cross country.

Another issue we've had with our POI, is that lessons are all labeled as day and night, and he has said we cannot do any part of a 'day' lesson at night. That has become a huge problem with students that have a 3 to 5 PM flight slot, because in December and January, half of their flight slot is 'night' and we can't complete a 'day' lesson. Absolute ridiculousness. Again, according to the regs, the FAA doesn't care if a student completes their entire rating at night, there is no maximum allowable night flight time, or minimum day requirements.

We are trying to get our TCO's changed, mainly because of the day/night issue, removing the word 'day' from all of those lessons, so if a flight runs late and part of it is completed... gasp!... after dark, the whole lesson may be completed. We are also removing 'local' from the local lessons, so that we won't be in violation of some arbitrary rule if we go one nm too far from our home airport. However, these process of changing the courses has been going on for a couple months now because of our friendly POI.

As for people extending flights, what should matter is how the student benefits from the flight. Obviously, if instructors are dragging students 50nm away just to log it as xc that isn't fair to the student. But there is no reason why on some 'local' flights that it would not be okay to take a student to another airport that happens to be 50nm+ to give them the experience of something new if you can still complete the required maneuvers, landings, etc, that is required in the lesson. I guess I fail to see how it is 'fudging the rules' to go 50 miles away from the home base, when the regs do not require flights that are less than 50nm in distance.
Celeste is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duksrule
Career Questions
21
06-22-2012 05:32 PM
backflip
Flight Schools and Training
3
11-18-2010 12:13 PM
Atrain77
Flight Schools and Training
10
02-09-2006 02:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices