Excess Bid?
#31
But OK, as long as you are once again willing to make significant change to system form and/or buy alot more DH tickets.
Any expense in all that?
How do those expenses compare to buying up lines or cost of furlough?
I don't think any of us have access to that type of data.
#32
Some SO's are going to training soon to 757 and 727 FO.
In ignoring my darkest outcome, -300, there would still be room for a smaller furlough without much change to the 727 flying schedule. The biggest problem is it would result in too many 727 CAs.
So the "smaller" option of an excess, as I see it -
20-40 ANC FOs
20-40 727 CAs
20-40 Airbus FOs
-1 757 FO
-1 up to 40 727 FOs (I think the SO POP issue is tertiary)
Result - About 50-100 more 727 SOs
In ignoring my darkest outcome, -300, there would still be room for a smaller furlough without much change to the 727 flying schedule. The biggest problem is it would result in too many 727 CAs.
So the "smaller" option of an excess, as I see it -
20-40 ANC FOs
20-40 727 CAs
20-40 Airbus FOs
-1 757 FO
-1 up to 40 727 FOs (I think the SO POP issue is tertiary)
Result - About 50-100 more 727 SOs
Last edited by Gunter; 01-24-2009 at 01:14 PM.
#33
757 is a "growth" airplane and the training letter expires this fall (...plus alot of NDs bid it last year and will leave the jet in 2-4 yrs)
It's OK to get fat in the 757, especially with previous WB guys. It accomplishes the company goal of carrying any excess in NB seats rather than WB seats. They need not force them to 727 seat to accomplish that goal.
727 is on a slow glidepath to retirement in 2015 and is currently evenly manned across crew positions.
Putting "some extra" in the back eliminates some POP and does put them in a position for a small furlough.
...and of course that's all they really need to justify the reduced BLGs for a long, long time.
#34
DH tickets will be accepted for a time until things settle down
#35
BTW, thanks for doing the number crunching. I don't get into the details like that. Just working with round figures.
The company has a habit of making a move and accepting short term costs so that the longer term looks the way they want it. That explains a lot. There is a lot of inefficiency because it is difficult to predict the future and airplanes/crews need to be ready when needed. Long lead times are often required. But some costs are borne due to simple error. Kinda hard to tell the difference sometimes.
The company has a habit of making a move and accepting short term costs so that the longer term looks the way they want it. That explains a lot. There is a lot of inefficiency because it is difficult to predict the future and airplanes/crews need to be ready when needed. Long lead times are often required. But some costs are borne due to simple error. Kinda hard to tell the difference sometimes.
#36
Some SO's are going to training soon to 757 and 727 FO.
In ignoring my darkest outcome, -300, there would still be room for a smaller furlough without much change to the 727 flying schedule. The biggest problem is it would result in too many 727 CAs.
So the "smaller" option of an excess, as I see it -
20-40 ANC FOs
20-40 727 CAs
20-40 Airbus FOs
-1 757 FO
-1 up to 40 727 FOs (I think the SO POP issue is tertiary)
Result - About 60-100 more 727 SOs
In ignoring my darkest outcome, -300, there would still be room for a smaller furlough without much change to the 727 flying schedule. The biggest problem is it would result in too many 727 CAs.
So the "smaller" option of an excess, as I see it -
20-40 ANC FOs
20-40 727 CAs
20-40 Airbus FOs
-1 757 FO
-1 up to 40 727 FOs (I think the SO POP issue is tertiary)
Result - About 60-100 more 727 SOs
- 20-40 Airbus Capts and FOs (I really haven't studied this part at all)
-1 777 Capt and FO (..though only the FO portion will be effective)
-1 727 FO
-1 727 SO (not really sure this is needed for my logic)
Zero ANC
Zero 757
-+20 A300 HKG FO Vacancy
Net effects:
- 40 swap seats in 727 FO and SO
- some bump and flush in 777
- some increase in ANC (but not much as guys take 777 or 757 in Mem over moving/commuting to ANC)
-increase in 757 Capt and FO
-...and a few more folks bid HKG FO
Then run the #s on training costs, move packages, etc.
If they don't like the #s, cancel the whole bid (except the HKG vacancies of course) and start all over again.
I don't think they are in panic mode ---- they are going to forge ahead deliberately and incrementally.
Last edited by DLax85; 01-24-2009 at 01:19 PM. Reason: clarity
#37
#38
....or they fill the 757 with excessed WB Capts and FOs looking to stay in MEM.
#39
- 20-40 Airbus Capts and FOs (I really haven't studied this part at all)
-1 777 Capt and FO (..though only the FO portion will be effective)
-1 727 FO
-1 727 SO (not really sure this is needed for my logic)
Zero ANC
Zero 757
-+20 A300 HKG FO Vacancy
Net effects:
- 40 swap seats in 727 FO and SO
- some bump and flush in 777
- some increase in ANC (but not much as guys take 777 or 757 in Mem over moving/commuting to ANC)
-increase in 757 Capt and FO
-...and a few more folks bid HKG FO
.
You are giving some of those that missed out on the MD11 bandwagon a chance to go....without much flush downward.
Very incremental. Radical even. You see no furlough then
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



