Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Crewbus Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2010, 01:43 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flying Boxes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 566
Default Seniority rights?!

Wasn't this the mantra few years ago?

It gives the impression only senior pilots have "senority rights".
Flying Boxes is online now  
Old 02-05-2010, 01:51 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 538
Default

Originally Posted by FlyByNite
Well, if it's ok the the 757 Flexs to stay in the seat. Why can't the ANC FOs be allowed to stay in ANC at SO pay if they so choose? Also, are there any 727 FO's senior to these folks who would like to go and Flex on the 75, but aren't allowed to because they can't bid to be a 75 flex while on the 727. This is stupid, you either hold the airplane or you don't. If you can't hold the airplane, then you go to the seat you can hold. Just my opinion, and I could be wrong....which according to my wife, is a frequent occurrence.
No you're right!

The company created this mess (excess) and now we giving up our contractual rights to fix it... Nuts!

I keep hearing that the union agreed to this and that and am wondering if anyone actually has the letters or message traffic that allows all of this to happen? Someone mentioned to me that they are using the FDA LOA that allowed for possibly training out of seniority to agree to this in the excess bid; IMO the FDA LOA has no bearing on this matter at all. I feel like the upper echelon on our seniority list is apathetic to the lowest 300-500 guys and since it doesn't affect the senior guys it must be OK. Of course if this was happening to the top 500 guys there would be chaos right now.

Last edited by Flaps50; 02-05-2010 at 02:04 PM.
Flaps50 is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 02:42 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AFW_MD11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD11 FO, ANC
Posts: 1,098
Default

Originally Posted by Flaps50
No you're right!

The company created this mess (excess) and now we giving up our contractual rights to fix it... Nuts!

I keep hearing that the union agreed to this and that and am wondering if anyone actually has the letters or message traffic that allows all of this to happen? Someone mentioned to me that they are using the FDA LOA that allowed for possibly training out of seniority to agree to this in the excess bid; IMO the FDA LOA has no bearing on this matter at all. I feel like the upper echelon on our seniority list is apathetic to the lowest 300-500 guys and since it doesn't affect the senior guys it must be OK. Of course if this was happening to the top 500 guys there would be chaos right now.
You'd be amazed at how many things our union has agreed to/negotiated with the company - the results of which are not published anywhere for the pilot group to read.

Seems like every time I call Contract Enforcement I learn of a new (to me) settlement agreement/arbitration ruling/back-alley-deal that has been struck - but isn't published anywhere.

Me: "Hey, DT.....the company just did XYZ to me, and I can't find that written anywhere in the contract.....can they DO that to me?"

DT: "oh....yeah....back in the FPA days....we had a guy grieve that and we settled with the company on how to handle it in the future"

Me: "interesting....where is that written down so I can peruse the information?"

DT: "unfortunately, it's not written anywhere......any more questions I can help you with?"

example - did you know that airport stby's are not assigned to Reserve pilots who request First Fly? unless they would have been tagged with it in leveling order (First Fly or not)? So.....First Fly only means FIRST for trips - not stby duty.

written anywhere? in the CBA that way? no. just have to call either CRS or ALPA to find out that little tidbit.

I'm sure there's plenty more examples - that's just one I found out about recently.

But, whaddaya want? REAL accountability or transparency from the organization that represents "our collective best interests"?
AFW_MD11 is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 03:11 PM
  #114  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by Flaps50
No you're right!

The company created this mess (excess) and now we giving up our contractual rights to fix it... Nuts!

I keep hearing that the union agreed to this and that and am wondering if anyone actually has the letters or message traffic that allows all of this to happen? Someone mentioned to me that they are using the FDA LOA that allowed for possibly training out of seniority to agree to this in the excess bid; IMO the FDA LOA has no bearing on this matter at all. I feel like the upper echelon on our seniority list is apathetic to the lowest 300-500 guys and since it doesn't affect the senior guys it must be OK. Of course if this was happening to the top 500 guys there would be chaos right now.
Actually, it does. The FDA LOA is what started all of this realignment bidding in the first place! With such a good deal for us pilots, they couldnt get the R seat filled in HKG. Hence the smoke and mirrors with the start of the excess bids.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 03:29 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 538
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by iarapilot
Actually, it does. The FDA LOA is what started all of this realignment bidding in the first place! With such a good deal for us pilots, they couldnt get the R seat filled in HKG. Hence the smoke and mirrors with the start of the excess bids.
I agree that the company knew HKG would be filled with everyone heading backwards, but that was not the root cause of the excess IMO just a nice benefit for the company. The current economic disaster and the uncertain future economy was the main reason for the excess bid and now they are realizing that it was to much and want their cake and want to eat it too (gorge on it with 4a2b). Show me where it is written that the union has a agreed to allow out of seniority training as it refers to the excess bid. The FDA LOA has nothing contractually to do with the excess bid and if it is being portrayed that way by the union then the union leadership is overstepping its authority. The contract that I have says excessed Pilots will be trained in reverse seniority order period; not according to what plane they are going to, not according to what seat, not according to what backdoor deal someone has made with someone else...

That sentence in the contract is so plainly clear how would we allow it to be convoluted to mean something else than what is so plainly written. We let the company add about a million things to the 4a2b language, but now this too.
Flaps50 is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 03:47 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Unknown Rider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Bent Over
Posts: 531
Default

Originally Posted by Flaps50
I agree that the company knew HKG would be filled with everyone heading backwards, but that was not the root cause of the excess IMO just a nice benefit for the company. The current economic disaster and the uncertain future economy was the main reason for the excess bid and now they are realizing that it was to much and want their cake and want to eat it too (gorge on it with 4a2b). Show me where it is written that the union has a agreed to allow out of seniority training as it refers to the excess bid. The FDA LOA has nothing contractually to do with the excess bid and if it is being portrayed that way by the union then the union leadership is overstepping its authority. The contract that I have says excessed Pilots will be trained in reverse seniority order period; not according to what plane they are going to, not according to what seat, not according to what backdoor deal someone has made with someone else...

That sentence in the contract is so plainly clear how would we allow it to be convoluted to mean something else than what is so plainly written. We let the company add about a million things to the 4a2b language, but now this too.


It has nothing to do with the FDA LOA. I believe it was grievance settlement 09-08. Call or email the Grievance Committee chairman or talk to the lawyers at the union for specifics.
Unknown Rider is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 03:51 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DaRaiders's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: On the corner, covered in Stickum
Posts: 375
Default

Originally Posted by FlyByNite
Well, if it's ok the the 757 Flexs to stay in the seat. Why can't the ANC FOs be allowed to stay in ANC at SO pay if they so choose? Also, are there any 727 FO's senior to these folks who would like to go and Flex on the 75, but aren't allowed to because they can't bid to be a 75 flex while on the 727. This is stupid, you either hold the airplane or you don't. If you can't hold the airplane, then you go to the seat you can hold. Just my opinion, and I could be wrong....which according to my wife, is a frequent occurrence.
You're being WAY too logical, dude!
DaRaiders is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 03:59 PM
  #118  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by Flaps50
I agree that the company knew HKG would be filled with everyone heading backwards, but that was not the root cause of the excess IMO just a nice benefit for the company. The current economic disaster and the uncertain future economy was the main reason for the excess bid and now they are realizing that it was to much and want their cake and want to eat it too (gorge on it with 4a2b). Show me where it is written that the union has a agreed to allow out of seniority training as it refers to the excess bid. The FDA LOA has nothing contractually to do with the excess bid and if it is being portrayed that way by the union then the union leadership is overstepping its authority. The contract that I have says excessed Pilots will be trained in reverse seniority order period; not according to what plane they are going to, not according to what seat, not according to what backdoor deal someone has made with someone else...

That sentence in the contract is so plainly clear how would we allow it to be convoluted to mean something else than what is so plainly written. We let the company add about a million things to the 4a2b language, but now this too.
I agree. And they are gorging on the cake. We can only hope for a heart attack!
iarapilot is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 04:00 PM
  #119  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by iarapilot
Actually, it does. The FDA LOA is what started all of this realignment bidding in the first place! With such a good deal for us pilots, they couldnt get the R seat filled in HKG. Hence the smoke and mirrors with the start of the excess bids.

PS-It was tongue in cheek sarcasm.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 02-05-2010, 04:01 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 538
Default

Originally Posted by Unknown Rider
It has nothing to do with the FDA LOA. I believe it was grievance settlement 09-08. Call or email the Grievance Committee chairman or talk to the lawyers at the union for specifics.
I'll have to look at that grievance. So basically the company does something wrong to create a grievance from us, then we give in and give them something in return for screwing us in the first place. Great system.
Flaps50 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PurpleCRJ
Mesa Airlines
64
09-03-2009 09:28 AM
captain152
Regional
74
06-15-2009 08:46 PM
Excel
Major
48
02-03-2009 06:12 AM
bgmann
Regional
16
01-12-2009 07:05 PM
PDTPHXBase2009
Regional
24
10-16-2008 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices