Crewbus Rumors
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
#112
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, if it's ok the the 757 Flexs to stay in the seat. Why can't the ANC FOs be allowed to stay in ANC at SO pay if they so choose? Also, are there any 727 FO's senior to these folks who would like to go and Flex on the 75, but aren't allowed to because they can't bid to be a 75 flex while on the 727. This is stupid, you either hold the airplane or you don't. If you can't hold the airplane, then you go to the seat you can hold. Just my opinion, and I could be wrong....which according to my wife, is a frequent occurrence.
![Big Grin](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
The company created this mess (excess) and now we giving up our contractual rights to fix it... Nuts!
I keep hearing that the union agreed to this and that and am wondering if anyone actually has the letters or message traffic that allows all of this to happen? Someone mentioned to me that they are using the FDA LOA that allowed for possibly training out of seniority to agree to this in the excess bid; IMO the FDA LOA has no bearing on this matter at all. I feel like the upper echelon on our seniority list is apathetic to the lowest 300-500 guys and since it doesn't affect the senior guys it must be OK. Of course if this was happening to the top 500 guys there would be chaos right now.
Last edited by Flaps50; 02-05-2010 at 02:04 PM.
#113
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No you're right!![Big Grin](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
The company created this mess (excess) and now we giving up our contractual rights to fix it... Nuts!
I keep hearing that the union agreed to this and that and am wondering if anyone actually has the letters or message traffic that allows all of this to happen? Someone mentioned to me that they are using the FDA LOA that allowed for possibly training out of seniority to agree to this in the excess bid; IMO the FDA LOA has no bearing on this matter at all. I feel like the upper echelon on our seniority list is apathetic to the lowest 300-500 guys and since it doesn't affect the senior guys it must be OK. Of course if this was happening to the top 500 guys there would be chaos right now.
![Big Grin](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
The company created this mess (excess) and now we giving up our contractual rights to fix it... Nuts!
I keep hearing that the union agreed to this and that and am wondering if anyone actually has the letters or message traffic that allows all of this to happen? Someone mentioned to me that they are using the FDA LOA that allowed for possibly training out of seniority to agree to this in the excess bid; IMO the FDA LOA has no bearing on this matter at all. I feel like the upper echelon on our seniority list is apathetic to the lowest 300-500 guys and since it doesn't affect the senior guys it must be OK. Of course if this was happening to the top 500 guys there would be chaos right now.
Seems like every time I call Contract Enforcement I learn of a new (to me) settlement agreement/arbitration ruling/back-alley-deal that has been struck - but isn't published anywhere.
Me: "Hey, DT.....the company just did XYZ to me, and I can't find that written anywhere in the contract.....can they DO that to me?"
DT: "oh....yeah....back in the FPA days....we had a guy grieve that and we settled with the company on how to handle it in the future"
Me: "interesting....where is that written down so I can peruse the information?"
DT: "unfortunately, it's not written anywhere......any more questions I can help you with?"
example - did you know that airport stby's are not assigned to Reserve pilots who request First Fly? unless they would have been tagged with it in leveling order (First Fly or not)? So.....First Fly only means FIRST for trips - not stby duty.
written anywhere? in the CBA that way? no. just have to call either CRS or ALPA to find out that little tidbit.
I'm sure there's plenty more examples - that's just one I found out about recently.
But, whaddaya want? REAL accountability or transparency from the organization that represents "our collective best interests"?
#114
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No you're right!![Big Grin](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
The company created this mess (excess) and now we giving up our contractual rights to fix it... Nuts!
I keep hearing that the union agreed to this and that and am wondering if anyone actually has the letters or message traffic that allows all of this to happen? Someone mentioned to me that they are using the FDA LOA that allowed for possibly training out of seniority to agree to this in the excess bid; IMO the FDA LOA has no bearing on this matter at all. I feel like the upper echelon on our seniority list is apathetic to the lowest 300-500 guys and since it doesn't affect the senior guys it must be OK. Of course if this was happening to the top 500 guys there would be chaos right now.
![Big Grin](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
The company created this mess (excess) and now we giving up our contractual rights to fix it... Nuts!
I keep hearing that the union agreed to this and that and am wondering if anyone actually has the letters or message traffic that allows all of this to happen? Someone mentioned to me that they are using the FDA LOA that allowed for possibly training out of seniority to agree to this in the excess bid; IMO the FDA LOA has no bearing on this matter at all. I feel like the upper echelon on our seniority list is apathetic to the lowest 300-500 guys and since it doesn't affect the senior guys it must be OK. Of course if this was happening to the top 500 guys there would be chaos right now.
![Wink](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#115
![Lightbulb](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon3.gif)
That sentence in the contract is so plainly clear how would we allow it to be convoluted to mean something else than what is so plainly written. We let the company add about a million things to the 4a2b language, but now this too.
![Mad](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/mad.gif)
#116
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree that the company knew HKG would be filled with everyone heading backwards, but that was not the root cause of the excess IMO just a nice benefit for the company. The current economic disaster and the uncertain future economy was the main reason for the excess bid and now they are realizing that it was to much and want their cake and want to eat it too (gorge on it with 4a2b). Show me where it is written that the union has a agreed to allow out of seniority training as it refers to the excess bid. The FDA LOA has nothing contractually to do with the excess bid and if it is being portrayed that way by the union then the union leadership is overstepping its authority. The contract that I have says excessed Pilots will be trained in reverse seniority order period; not according to what plane they are going to, not according to what seat, not according to what backdoor deal someone has made with someone else...
That sentence in the contract is so plainly clear how would we allow it to be convoluted to mean something else than what is so plainly written. We let the company add about a million things to the 4a2b language, but now this too.![Mad](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/mad.gif)
That sentence in the contract is so plainly clear how would we allow it to be convoluted to mean something else than what is so plainly written. We let the company add about a million things to the 4a2b language, but now this too.
![Mad](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/mad.gif)
It has nothing to do with the FDA LOA. I believe it was grievance settlement 09-08. Call or email the Grievance Committee chairman or talk to the lawyers at the union for specifics.
#117
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, if it's ok the the 757 Flexs to stay in the seat. Why can't the ANC FOs be allowed to stay in ANC at SO pay if they so choose? Also, are there any 727 FO's senior to these folks who would like to go and Flex on the 75, but aren't allowed to because they can't bid to be a 75 flex while on the 727. This is stupid, you either hold the airplane or you don't. If you can't hold the airplane, then you go to the seat you can hold. Just my opinion, and I could be wrong....which according to my wife, is a frequent occurrence.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#118
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree that the company knew HKG would be filled with everyone heading backwards, but that was not the root cause of the excess IMO just a nice benefit for the company. The current economic disaster and the uncertain future economy was the main reason for the excess bid and now they are realizing that it was to much and want their cake and want to eat it too (gorge on it with 4a2b). Show me where it is written that the union has a agreed to allow out of seniority training as it refers to the excess bid. The FDA LOA has nothing contractually to do with the excess bid and if it is being portrayed that way by the union then the union leadership is overstepping its authority. The contract that I have says excessed Pilots will be trained in reverse seniority order period; not according to what plane they are going to, not according to what seat, not according to what backdoor deal someone has made with someone else...
That sentence in the contract is so plainly clear how would we allow it to be convoluted to mean something else than what is so plainly written. We let the company add about a million things to the 4a2b language, but now this too.![Mad](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/mad.gif)
That sentence in the contract is so plainly clear how would we allow it to be convoluted to mean something else than what is so plainly written. We let the company add about a million things to the 4a2b language, but now this too.
![Mad](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/mad.gif)
![Wink](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#119
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
PS-It was tongue in cheek sarcasm.
#120
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post